Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
Not really. I am the single biggest non-mod influencer in his getting banned and he and I have mutual-block and we're both too stubborn to unblock the other.
I do not see that as the path to go down. I do see a lot more light in the path Drafterman has been taking and what he's been striving towards. While I regret how good and how passionate i was at stopping him, I am also somewhat regretful that I didn't sit back and question my ego first. Drafterman likes to berate the person he opposes, which includes me, in his quest to achieve what he sees as right. This led to me and him also mutually blocking one another and again the same issue occurs as neither him nor Wylted contact me outside of this site, although Wylted and I have been on Hangouts together at a rare occasion here and there.
I don't really think you know how I will achieve what I want and I think that's a good thing. In the end I will win because I will genuinely, undeniably, be as powerful in stopping bsh1 as I was at stopping Drafterman inciting rebellion against him. I am not really concerned with who I side with or against, I care only that I side with myself and with Justice.
This is what separates me from both Wylted, Drafterman AND Bsh1; I define myself by myself. I do not define myself or my actions by what they oppose(d) and how they broke their code to get there. I do admit, I have flexibility in morals because to me application of one's 'code' is everything that defines it in the end but I also don't admit that the core ideas are irrelevant. In practise, the closest thing to me in DDO and DA history is basically negligible. You haven't seen a leader like me yet, not even close to it. I'd say the most 'unlike me' would be Mikal as President or Bossy as leading the 'anti-all-president' campaign and whatever else was going on then. I am not here to cause chaos, I'm here to embrace it to achieve order later on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
I'm with Wylted on which of those 2 is the case. :)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
I am curious not about you or why you did it, you've never been a big enemy of mine from start of me infamy to now. You have always been among the least-vile of my enemies out of the enemy-group so I have very little beef with you. I was asking him if it would be okay if I did that with an off-site google doc and he insisted absolutely not. Then I asked why it's okay that you did it, he said "I'll look into it"... a week later... No response.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
Not offended, apparently pissing his pants terrified of me doxxing him and killing him IRL so much so that I had to be banned for the protection of those I had terrified with my threats. LOL
^^ I have never done this, nor did I say I would.
Created:
-->
@spacetime
Clearly it's completely fine to call me pathetic so let's keep up the insulting, eh? :) I will get banned if i tell you to stop because it's punishable so let's not punish each other, let's keep hurling abuse.
Created:
-->
@spacetime
I do have an idea how pathetic I sound to someone as faulty-brained as you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
Bsh1 also told me he'd come up with a single explanation of how posting the amount of humiliation and abuse that you did in that story is acceptable just because it's an off-site link that you linked to on-site and even tried to gain money for writing previously. It names and shames people who are both from DDO history and on DA presently and he insisted he'd look into it and explain to me why he's going to consider that okay even though he also admitted that if I posted abuse off-site and linked to it on-site that there'd definitely be punishments.
I'm still sitting and waiting for that explanation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
I was also banned for sticking up to said people on behalf of others, it wasn't just a me vs them thing. One of those users was Raltar hence his disgust at my banning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@thett3
I was banned for sticking up to your buddy REF. He called me a pathetic autistic waste of space and basically berated me in several different ways even post-ban and still isn't reprimanded for it whatsoever.
Spacetime joined in on a separate occasion and so did samstevens and drafterman in their own ways, the worst abuse coming to me via comments section of a deleted debate and also on comments of his own debate from Wylted. Wylted spread rumours that I'm some kind of serial doxxer among other horseshit accusations and somehow that's all fine and dandy to spread about me. I actually like being seen as a bigger threat than I am because it lets me rest for a few days, if not a couple weeks.
I don't care about the BS-standard that threatening people to stop abusing me or facing punishment is worse than snitching behind their backs and getting them punished more brutally but from now on I'll do a bit of... Well, both/neither. I will just click the red flag and not contact bsh1. I am done crying or whining. I will let some of their other victims or others who are disgusted by how they abuse me be the ones who fight for me, meanwhile I will work on other things like getting this corrupt hypocrite out of his seat of power.
Created:
-->
@disgusted
Created:
-->
@disgusted
I love that tune though. It's what Orochimaru's theme tune was based on and is so utterly pleasing to the ear drum.
Created:
-->
@disgusted
I'm more of a Kakuzu or an Itachi than an Orochimaru but there's for sure a lot of Orochimaru in me. I'd say I'm 80% like Orochimaru but I differ to him in how much I let ego cloud me and how little I care for those I step on. He is too egotistical and uncaring when compared to me.
If you made Itachi and Kakuzu into one character, that basically would be me. Careful, observant yet ruthless and terrifying in spite of it.
Created:
Buddhism is a religion that has, from day one of me discovering it, to this very date fascinated me despite my family having inherent dislike for the philosophy and being angry at me for defending Buddhist monks among other things. My family generally has the idea that Buddhism is a religion of laziness and corruption that only is able to last due to others doing the work for the Buddhist. I won't go into specifics about my dad beyond that but it's understandable why his side of the family think this about Buddhists.
As I grew I learned very much about the ideology and still today believe strongly in its methods and overall application but the core idea behind it is inverted. Buddhism aims to lead you to become nothing, to preserve things only so as to obstruct the rich and powerful and yet in practise Buddhism has always served the powerful by trying to be 'peaceful' and letting others hurt others around them remaining catatonic in the face of it.
Buddhism in many ways is what I call benevolent pyschopathy but the issue with this is that it ends up enabling the naturally gifted to brutally dominated the naturally cursed in an unfettered, Darwinistic manner. In being vegetarian and aiming to stop and hurt no one, you do end up somewhat helping the unfairly rich or unfairly powerful to continue on an upwards spiral of continual decimation of any who stand in their way. Buddhism is a good strategy to play it safe in life and end up happy at the sake of others but ultimately there's a core idea that I disagree with them on: not having ego and not being a hero.
You need to love yourself, you need to feel things... Deeply... Passionately. Otherwise why live at all? The Buddhist mentality would and has at times made me utterly suicidal. If you believe you're nothing, just a figment of reality happening by accident and aiming to just exist as is progressing towards nothing and being here for no purpose other than to eat, breathe and be a basic bitch then what the fuck are you alive for at all? Why not speed up the process and end it all? The enjoyment of life itself ends up contradicting the Buddhist ideology that says the reason you enjoy life is to aim to become nothing more than the moment here and now. If you're nothing more than the moment here and now, you can't then base everything on a greater philosophy that requires memory and strategy to maintain itself.
I believe strongly in ego and think we are taught to be humble because that benefits the powerful. If everyone is humble, aims to just live in their little corner assigned by the rich and ruthless, then no one changes anything and that lets them live in peace only so long as they ignore the agony and injustice at the hands of those around them. In the end, you can't be a proper Buddhist ever. If you sit by and do nothing, you're knowingly enabling the sadistic to be so, if you do act to stop them it requires ego, anger and passion which contradicts Buddhist philosophy at its core.
I understand why they choose to be cowards, it's a very calming way of life. I understand, really I do. That's why I aim to be only as calm as I need to be to fight another day. Stress has physical ailments as a result of it, you need to maintain a level of calm and zen and in that way I totally understand Buddhists and Taoists. Where I differ to the Buddhists is that the aim of this inner peace is to be the end in itself. Rather I believe it's the way to be smart and strong enough on the later times to fight smart and ruthlessly so as to stop a less smart but more unfair and ruthless group of leaders/tyrants.
That's my true belief.
Created:
-->
@disgusted
I am not God though, she is in full support of me on this regardless and enjoys hiding behind others at times so I'm willing to be the God to you people for now.
Created:
-->
@disgusted
Please do.
Edited: hahahahahaha
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
SS:
explain how, on a flat earth, the sun can cast shadows upwards onto clouds. I already did an experiment, referring to flat earth models for guidance on how the sun moves around, that demonstrates it is not possible for a mountain to cast a shadow, similar to the one I linked prior, onto a cloud. What it did show is that it is possible for that to happen on a spherical earth and not on a flat earth.
RM:
I think the single biggest thing to understand is that clouds are lower down that even the sky itself, this is true even in flat earth theory. Since you have understood what happens to perspective (even beyond eye-sight, due to genuine distortion based on distance and how we visually perceive reality even through a telescope) the 'up' and 'down' of the Sun is probably a total illusion just as much as it going form white to yellow to orange to red and vice versa depending how rainy the night was among other things. The way that the sun can case a shadow onto the clouds from a mountain and shine 'up onto clouds' is actually a more severely interesting thing for NASA to answer. If the sun is some massive ball of lava far, far away from us then why would the way it shines light be anything other than relatively vertical at all times? As we rotate around ourselves and then rotate around the sun, wouldn't there be a consistent angle of light? I don't mean that it wouldn't cast onto the clouds from the side or diagonally but I do mean that it should be doing it relatively identical to all the clouds at one time. Instead it appears this light-blaring disc is much closer to the sky and to us such that it shoots out at many different angles. This is supported even on the image you have. What happens with the sun shooting at an angle that results in it hitting a cloud from the side or slightly underneath is literally because the sun is actually moving. The sun is physically moving and when it's 'down' in our perspective it's not a total illusion in terms of relative to the rest of our perspective. It's genuinely moving and altering colour, this is a real linked-to-it-moving illusion that means that the very way it shines is not going to be up-down as it hits the lower side of our vision. It is identical in absurdity to why the sun turns orange and reddish. It's always really the same thing and same colour right? Why would such a powerful light alter its colour? It doesn't, even NASA supports this. Until a supernova the ends our solar system happens, the sun will remain a pretty identical colour perhaps gradually getting less white and more red as it dies out but ultimately remaining yellowish-white overall. Yet, we see it turn orange and red almost every sunset and fairly often enough at sunrise if the night wasn't rainy but the day is about to be. This is because atmosphere alters how the light appears to us. This includes the angle but usually the illusion of the sun's angle is much more consistent no matter the whether and much more dependent simply on where it is relative to our 'sky' at that moment. Our 'sky' is the 'sky' that you and I maximally see, not to the whole sky of the Earth at that moment.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
HiSSy Fit Stevens:
If you had a respect for evidence, you never would have linked them. However, it appears as though you too, like them, have no idea what an independent variable is... whether that's because you are ignorant, are a troll, or are deluded, who knows... all I know is that you did not establish any credibility of the flat earth belief.
RM: Blablabla? Is there anything there that's anything other than CoC violating insult and just blatant ad hominem-type attempts to defame me and discredit me based on my character? Nice try, Silly Stevens.
SS
provide a video that shows distance alone causing mirage-like effects, not a video recorded in the baking sun beating down on a tennis court.
RM:
It's only obvious when it's sunny. The effect that happens when it's less blaring sunlight is that the squashing occurs without the 'glimmering'. What also happens is that the further away the actual object is, the more brutally thin the 'squash' section is relative the rest of it. If it's a cold day, sun is being obscured by either clouds or 'white-sky', you will see the horizon appears much more like Round Earthers support. They will see the object go 'down' and 'down' and 'down' especially like a boat where the last thing to go 'down' is its sail. The squashing effect will be so minimally glimmering or visible (especially if filmed on water, which all boat-scenarios are), that the denial of there being a maximal range of vision that is there even if we had super-eyesight and telescopes, means that Round Earthers justify the 'down into the ground' effect as proof of the Earth being Round. What is even more consistent with Round Earth theory, and why it's able to mesh so well with the real, flat Earth, is that whether you go closer to the object or 'up' into the sky, you will be able to again see the object and you will 'see' it go bottom-up because you're gradually undoing the minimalistic mirage effect. The reason that it's only blatant on a sunny day is that over a much smaller distance you can already see it happening. This is also supported by the face that the 'horizon' in a desert will shimmer with much less way to tell just how 'far out' what you're seeing is unless you already knew the ratio of distance-to-mirage-size.
That is the only way to prove it in a blatant way. If it's less sun-intense environment, instead of the mirage being blatant, you will see the squashing without the 'watery' effect to make it clear how and why it's happening.
In short, such an experiment would likely only be able to squash the tiniest bit of that tiny object on the tennis court into the ground because you'd have to travel to the maximal range of human eyesight to make the squashing happen. It's only ever able to happen on the smaller scale, in a more blatant way, because of the sunlight helping speed up and maximise the effect. This is a cop-out but it's a cop-out based on there because the mirage effect on a cold/non-sunny day is literally the gradual 'moving down into the ground', that's literally the effect. There's no shimmering of any significant degree and even that tiny amount of shimmering (especially in the boat-on-water scenario) is attributed to the water or whatever else.
The point is that as soon as we realise the ships or whatever you film, going 'down' past the line of vision is not proof of Earth's curvature, we start to look elsewhere for proof and patterns. Unfortunately, most stop there and say 'well here's the proof so let's apply confirmation bias to everything else we find'. That's genuinely how and why the Round-Earth theory gained momentum with the increase of ship-movement and conquest from the colonial times through to America's origin. The natural way to have perceived reality of this world in a visual and spatial sense, would have been the flat-Earth model had we not believed we were 'seeing' things 'go over' the curvature. It is even more of an issue because the fish-eye-type lens of many oldschool pseudo-telescopes that pirate's used could even make curvature artificially appear on the horizontal way (the horizon being correctly assumed to be flat and sideways led to inspire the word 'horizontal' after all). Whether the pirates or monarch-serving sailors were using a lower tech telescope or fish-eye-type lens, it still was relatively blatant to all the the Earth wasn't quite curving left-to-right as they were still smart enough to factor in the distortion that comes with such a lens. You will point out that fish-eye lens was invented much more recently but based on how they curved glass they could make that effect happen long before.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
SadStevens:
and that no one should take you guys seriously because of that
HappySadman:
Sorry but what exactly is it that no one should take us seriously on? No one should take the theory that the Earth is flat because of flat earthers having come up with some ideas that have no link to flat-earth theory and have been proven wrong, such as Australia not existing? Fascinating logic there.
DamnGrievance:
and I just proved that no one should take you seriously.
RuthlessMonster:
How did you do that?
CoC-violating Badman:
Despite having the reputation of you talking out of your ass,
CoC-masterful Madman:
Shut the fuck up about reputation and stick to the topic at hand. Defaming your opponent is the tell-tale tactic of someone losing the debate.
SS:
I gave you the opportunity to defend your beliefs about the world and to give the flat earth belief some credibility.
RM:
Is this something you decided you gave me or something others concluded you gave me? All I see is continual shut-down, mockery and ignorance. In fact the one time you proved to have genuinely watched the video, you were stunned as to what to say back so you just contradicted your own proof for Round Earth by saying 'ignore the senses' as the only comeback to a thoroughly in-depth multi-angled argument for the Sun's rotating being illusory in its up-down swing and that there's an illusion due to how our eyes and reality around us forms visually at an angle.
Schutzstaffel:
You made some claims and some video referrals as evidence. I examined your claims and evidence and they're nothing but garbage.
RealMan:
You examined the tiniest part of a massively intense video where the person said that our senses contradict with Round Earth theory and said 'ha he relies on his senses' when he was actually explaining how the senses can make the illusory up-down rotating appear when it's really only 'around' the equator or near to it, depending on the season.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
ShamStevens:
I am saying that you guys have
PassionateMadman:
Ad Hominem (Guilt by Association)argumentum ad hominem(also known as: association fallacy, bad company fallacy, company that you keep fallacy, they’re not like us fallacy, transfer fallacy)Description: When the source is viewed negatively because of its association with another person or group who is already viewed negatively.Logical Form:Person 1 states that Y is true.Person 2 also states that Y is true, and person 2 is a moron.Therefore, person 1 must be a moron too.Example #1:Delores is a big supporter for equal pay for equal work. This is the same policy that all those extreme feminist groups support. Extremists like Delores should not be taken seriously -- at least politically.Explanation: Making the assumption that Delores is an extreme feminist simply because she supports a policy that virtually every man and woman also support, is fallacious.Example #2:Pol Pot, the Cambodian Maoist revolutionary, was against religion, and he was a very bad man. Frankie is against religion; therefore, Frankie also must be a very bad man.Explanation: The fact that Pol Pot and Frankie share one particular view does not mean they are identical in other ways unrelated, specifically, being a very bad man. Pol Pot was not a bad man because he was against religion, he was a bad man for his genocidal actions.Exception: If one can demonstrate that the connection between the two characteristics that were inherited by association is causally linked, or the probability of taking on a characteristic would be high, then it would be validPol Pot, the Cambodian Maoist revolutionary, was genocidal; therefore, he was a very bad man. Frankie is genocidal; therefore, Frankie must also be a very bad man.References:Walton, D. (1998). Ad hominem arguments. University of Alabama Press.
ScamStevens:
a horrible track record of providing extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims
RationalBatman:
Err, such as?
Australia not being real is one thing but is that it? Is the track record of the others part of my own? Shall we look at the history of what the Greeks, who invented Round-Earth theory, and the entire history of Round-Earth-supporting leaders since then have done? Shall we look at every person who believes the Earth is Round and has done horrific things? Almost all organised crime has been done by Round-Earthers in the past few centuries. Even the Muslims who ignore their Qur'an supporting flat-earth have been Round Earthers due to how science and the authorities controlling it evolved with time. Would you like me to prove that Round-Earthers are numerically responsible for worse atrocities based on unjustifiable motives and that they are not just worse people but less rational in why and how they go about doing said abuse? The Ancient Egyptians were extremely rational in how and why they proportionally punished the slaves relative to how obstructive the slave was to the regime and how they were much more lenient on slaves who worked harder and did well. This was the first recorded flat-earth-supporting regime, the slaves under them supported Judaism and that is also a flat-earth supporting religion if you read Old Testament and how it says the World was fixed in one place as God made it among other lines that severely outrules round-earth that rotates in the middle of space. So no matter who you side with, the original organised humans were flat-earthers but I wonder why the same regime that the illuminati-eye is based upon (Ancient Egyptians) ends up being the one responsible for the deception. Perhaps they realised something in the poles or some reason to keep us inside and designed in Earth-Model that severely would not make us ever want to venture far into it unless an officially licensed scientist on a very specific mission with strict rules of where and when to go somewhere in said pole (this is much truer for the 'south pole' than the north pole).
Created:
Bsh1 is a hypocritical 2-faced joke of a mod that I was wrong to have admired but that doesn't mean I need to run with my tail between my legs.
At first I was mistaken, I thought he was on a third side. That there were the real G's like me and Raltar and that there were 2 other sides, scum that bully and exist to drag the site down like REF, Wylted and Drafterman and then there was a third side, half-good deluded pacifists like Castin and bsh1.
No. There's only two sides. Much like when I realised that reality as we know is it a simulation based on binary coding, I realised I was wrong about so many things in the past 72 hours that I finally was ready to quit and feel ashamed, humiliated and let my jaded wounding let me stay down. Then I had some thoughts, watched some Netflix and other such things and realised the ultimate truth.
Some of you motherfuckers have forgotten who the hell RM was, some of you (including me) have forgotten what a tough-ass genius I am and all of us have forgotten my destiny; to rule you all as a ruthless but undeniably fair leader in the future. It is time that I pursue my destiny. It is time that I do not let the fact I was wrong be reason to not enjoy becoming right.
This time Bsh1, you can sit the fuck down and listen. This time, I will spit not at your opponents but in your face.
I am on the side of the rebellion. I am on the side of Wylted, Drafterman and all those scum because you, bsh1, are a 2-faced sack of something that CoC will be violated by if I say it. You are the hypocrite to shame all hypocrites. I tell you this now, bsh1, Airmax was a better mod than you and that's fucking disgusting to type for me.
Once you're done watching that video to remember just who the fuck I am, how about you listen to this beat and read my lyrics:
One too many pussies round here think I'm a threat,
So they criticize a homosexual mod 'till he feels he's in debt,
So he repays these cunt bullies so they praise him for tazing me but there's a vital thing you forget...
You speak of terror, of me doxxing, threat'nin',
But trust me when I say that you won't get any threats anymore, no oblique uses of a weapon,
I'm gonna remind who the fuck I am one step at a time until I'm head mod, and you're long gone, in fear or my real G Brethren,
Bsh1 Imma tell you straight I'm making moves, this day forth I'll play your game, you lose,
I didn't mean a fucking word of the praise I gave you the day I got banned I said it so you'd snooze,
So you'd stall the ban but my awesome plan is much deeper than just coming back and saying I'll beat you 'til your ego's scarred not just bruised,
This aint about a warning, this aint about a promise, this is about me reminding you just who the fuck made this site be what it is, to be honest,
You can spit shit about 'open moderation' but we both know that mouth, is made for making bullshit CoC, so much shit up in it; you suck mod and I don't mean down south,
You pretend to be a lover, a pacifist and progressive but you're just a tyrant in disguise and I'm not the type of evil genius you should have messed with,
From now on I'll undo what I did to befriend you, bringin' people to the site to join me and defend you,
I'll show you what happens when I support drafterman on a quest to ruin you like a trap for a rat with cheddar,
I can incite disharmony except I work a million times smarter than D-man and am infinitely better,
This was the last straw, I'm a camel, go do the math,
You're gonna wish to heavens high I stayed banned on DDO and never came back,
I'm gonna show you what happens when the threats stop and I do things for real, no take-backs,
I will school you and your hypocritical anti-analytical way of running the site and making rules, you're a joke to this bat,
So sit here adorning your fiat piety, you won't last long, I'm strong and mighty,
Come boy ban me, lie and fight me,
If I go down this time, I won't go quietly,
That's not a threat, not a promise just stating facts politely.
You're a hypocrite who doesn't give a shit about being true to a single moral, you're a cracked-up fallen angel, long-lost spirit,
You let people point and laugh, humiliate and degrade me,
And if I dare fight back they piss their fag pants and cry like a baby,
WAAA WAA BISHY HELP ME HE'S SCARY,
HE TOLD ME HE'S AN EVIL JUJU FAIRY,
Then you call me the snitch, yeah you call me the coward,
But all they do's run and bitch about how it's too easy for me to have them terrified 'n' overpowered,
This goes to all of 'em, they know who they are, don't make me name them,
Just know deep down I'm a Kingpin and each one'll become even more of a lame boo-hoo-addicted cuckold once I tame them,
This time no threats, no intimidation, I'll act behind the scenes, without explanation,
You're gonna pray that I'd warn, beg God for mercy but you should know that I'm a wild beast and the most ferocious among you well-tamed alsations,
So this is the new me, opaque can't see through me, no threats, live in real-ass terror asking Satan what will my next move be?
This is real-life, pussy, no hero-wins storyline protection like a movie, I'm gonna use the rules like tools, ya fools, and even outplay the mods if they abuse me.
Posting stories juiced with abuse in every single paragraph,
Oh that's okay, but if I did it, banned and you fake fucks would laugh,
You treat me like I'm a savage animal, insane, need a pill,
But you're all just cannibals, tearing at me, calling me autistic, mentally ill, prodding at me until I snap, giggling for a thrill,
This time I'll outsmart, outfight, out-write with a quill,
I'm here to stay or go down as the toughest motherfucker there ever was a way to kill; too skilled.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
I ask bsh1 please to have some mercy if possible here and ban me later into the agreed time-frame. I am genuinely rushing and putting full-effort into my Rounds. Real-life duties and sleep caught up to me. I am sorry. I will do my best to get them post by the 10pm EST mark if possible.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
You are strawmanning the current rules, making them for more OCD than they are.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
No, they are the opposite of an improvement. They are vaguer, enabling even less rational voters to justify BS votes. This is a step in the wrong direction.
BrutalTruth, who won the debate he is complaining about, as well as MagicAintReal who is in the exact same boat, both agree with me severely strong on this matter. Raltar agrees with me, albeit less strong.
Notice something about those agreeing with me preferring the harsher voting laws in place versus these ones moving in the wrong direction?... They all take debating seriously as proven by their previous debates and general behaviour on the site.
How about you? You are a casual debater whose only debate is a debate where your opponent decides what points you get and Judge Debates don't even count towards official rating. So, do kindly explain why you support the OP instead of just quoting it and saying a phrase like 'marked improvement' without explaining why it is.
Created:
Posted in:
Australia is in the true map of flat Earth* and I meant the third one as truth and not what not to fall for. I don't care about this nonsense trolling of Flat Earthers, I'm banned for 2 days soon, peace.
Created:
Posted in:
I hate Islam with a searing passion but I cannot justify this 'cure' because it would stunt the creativity and emotional aspects of the mind that are so important in making life worth living and looking past the obvious.
Created:
Not everyone seeks power quite the same way or with the same ferocity.
Raltar is absolutely entitled to speak his mind and be considered informed on this matter regardless of his ranking.
Created:
Posted in:
I approve of the latter 3, I don't approve of the first and want to know a lot more about who he is and what he's been doing for 3 years on DDO.
I can only change or influence the latter 3, I support myself absolutely unironically and not with an ounce of comedy or 'haha he's fucking insane he'll never get it' as replacing bsh1 in the place of head mod. I no longer support Virtuoso in such a coup or manoeuvre as I have learned Virtuoso wants and respects bsh1 as his superior despite me being morally closer to Virt than (me to) bsh1 on a baseline level.
Since I can't change the one that I don't approve of, I fully submit to it in order to work with and for this community. Something you people didn't see was me changing from my RM days to now, you saw glimpses through Airmax-tinted, B****(can't name for he/she is user on this site)-framed glasses but none of you knew just how brutally victimised I was and how disgustingly corrupt BOTH of them were in achieving the long-term vilification of me and assumption that 'RM had it coming' every time they barbarically abused me. Who the fuck do you think took it off-site and encouraged me to off myself? Do you think I started it? Don't fuck with me in that way and expect DDO-privacy rules to apply you dipshit. Of course I would expose such a person to his/her facebook friends. Fuck off telling me I was wrong to do so, he/she was hysterically laughing with pure unrelenting sadism at the fact they'd made their friend's list private and blocked me until they realised I had copied all the names and such to a separate page before warning him/her. You wish to speak about me in retrospect as a threat to DDO harmony and a lot of other things such as an asshole making abusive conspiracy theory videos about the DDO elite but you don't know the half of what was happening behind the scenes and how sly Airmax and YYW were to me, conning me into feeling cared for and kicking me off the site each and every time. Fuck both of them and fuck B**** too. Utter bottom of the barrel in the site and this is what you didn't get; I was toxic to them because they were toxic to DDO and poisoned it left, right and centre in so many ways as did other users. You don't even understand just how much of a psychopath Airmax was to users like me. He only gave you a second chance if you had enough popularity encouraging him to do so, I don't think he actually could think for himself the entire time he was a mod, no wonder that as he's grown as a person he's grown to hate his role/job on DDO and decided not to join us here unless I'm unaware.
Fuck that was good to get off my chest. What I will say is this; I have known abuse from mods and I don't just mean on DDO. Bsh1 is up there with the best of them, I respect the guy immensely for his integrity thus far. He and I are not quite the same in our thinking patterns but I believe that this is actually because he's more 'true to his word' whereas I am more 'true to my spirit' and this leads us to differ in how to interpret CoC and go about it despite really having quite similar ideals overall. It's so easy to hate on and spit at the mod in any given site, unless they're the tyrannical type. There's no point doing that if they've earned your genuine admiration and respect on a moral level. I respect bsh1, both in how he treated me when he believed me to be a toxic waste of space to DDO to now. He always treated me with a lot more respect and showed me a lot more admiration than he truly should have thought I deserved based on how he otherwise saw and interpreted me and whom I was to DDO's community. Bsh1 has always been in my top-3 members from the moment he set foot on the site of DDO (I predate him, contrary to popular belief) to this very day. He does what he sees as morally imperative at any given time.
Created:
-->
@Mharman
How was the rap in your opinion?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
The word 'flesh' is in the middle of the sentence.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
Only one single of those warnings was an actual thing I said being abusive and was in the Mafia game I referred to. The site was about to collapse, you don't even know how much you are indebted to me. I have brought more users here than all other users combined except for that schoolkid batch. Raltar, yeshuabought, Castin and many others I have consoled and helped through tough times here and castin has returned the favor. There are users who quit this, such as type1, because he was tired of how he kept getting told to not poke fun or abuse while others he saw could freely do so in the forums. You don't understand how much I have done out of sheer love for this community and debating. I want a legit debating shrine where we love one another and nurture each noob to become a stellar thinker, debater and member of society. I will die trying this even if I end up permabanned here. I will try my level best with debate island but, as Wylted threatened you in that comments section and I genuinely mean, I'll eventually have enough spare cash to properly run a site like this with genuine advertising and legal action against repeat internet trespassers to the site. I will do it eventually if this community and DI don't evolve into a proper debating community. I don't care what you threaten me with or think I am scared shit of losing. I am not a coward to you as people think but I admit when someone is trying their best. You are a far better human being and mod than Max ever was or will be. Stop modelling yourself against him as your benchmark. I say things, you argue, ten days later you end up banning the guy I argued to ban or severely realising I told what was to come accurately. You can keep thinking I am your enemy if you want. I am happy to become that if need be. I will compete with this site and outdo you when and if I have the money and if you treat me like a piece of dirt despite all my heartfelt effort and passion to make this as good as it can be.
I'll stop threatening users, I'll start snitching in silence. I understand now this is what you want but this time please actually do something. Cheers.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
Deep down I want you to make a list of absolutely everyone who has filed reports against me and soul-search in yourself if it's a coincidence that all of them are actively sadistic to me and others verbally at any given chance. One loves to post pop-corn gif's as people break out tearing at one another.
This kind of culture is something I am the only reason hasn't succeeded in plaguing the site, I got 0 shame for my reasonably rebellious means of handling such toxic members.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
Have you noticed how 100% of my enemies on the site are bullies who would prey on others if I didn't make myself the target? Do you even understand how sociopathic the entire site has been until your recent 'kicking in' of being a healthily harsh and active mod?
Created:
-->
@bsh1
It's actually quite disgusting what you're doing with the [redacted] case vs me. It's truly immoral that I'm the one being punished.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
You gave me a list of 12 things at once. I don't understand what you call gradual.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
In any country, threatening people with prosecution is actually seen as the kinder thing to do than to blindside-sue them.
This is simply about facts of morality and legality.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
Yes quote each and every time you cry about me letting people know the rules and punishments of the site.
You want to 'not be a weapon' as your justification. Then you are a heavier-hitting unforeseen weapon indeed if there's no warning. No idea what kind of system of justice this is.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
Reminding people of rules and telling them they will be punished is undeniably the right thing to do if they are breaking the rules, I cannot fathom why it's not.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
bsh1, this is a complete lie. You have only warned me one single time about one specific Mafia game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
You are basically saying that since a ridiculously huge proportion of rapists have believed the Earth was Round and believed they were entitled to rape that person at that time, that Round Earthers believe that rape is okay.
^^^^^ I KNOW THIS IS IDIOTIC, I AM HIGHLIGHTING TO THIS GUY HOW OUTRAGEOUS HIS ATTACKS TO ME ARE.
Australia is real under any proper Flat Earther's model, do not fall for the following tricks:
- Thinking the official Flat Earth Society is anything other than a sham intentionally meant to combine a tiny bit of legitimate flat earth theory and put in a ton of mumbo jumbo.
- Thinking all flat Earthers are so because it says it in the Bible or Qur'an.
- It's not important, at all, that you associate me with some maniacs who will go and 'prove' that Australia is not real. That is not the issue here. Australia is the true map of Earth.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Outplayz
No. The ones who do that appear popular but are statistically not the actual popular ones. Alpha-types are known for the popularity and their ability to bully well, this is totally irrelevant to their moral compass and how they use their capacity to dominate others in overt manners.
The most popular kids are the Deltas and Lambdas, always.
Created:
-->
@Raltar
Honestly I am happy with this ban in net-benefit to the site and many chain reaction things happening with mods harshening in a fair manner.
Created:
-->
@TheHammer
To be clear, no. I know he is.
Created:
Very well. You will be banned tomorrow, sometime between 9:00pm and 11:59pm, EST. Consider this your advanced notice, so no advanced notice will be forthcoming the day of the ban. The ban will last two days.
You want to say goodbye for a 2 day ban? I mean, sure, go ahead.
- Kaiser Bsh1.
How did I get that 24 hour delay? How am I not permabanned? Why am I showing off or happy if I'm banned. Reasons behind my methods will always remain idiotic and cryptic to most, if not all. I'm a madman who may as well be locked in an asylum as far as some of you are concerned.
I will spit the truth here and now, listen or not, your loss either way:
What you see before you, no doubt seems retarded,
As DDO was dying you thought RM had long-departed,
Some of you saw me here like 'wait a minute, you're an OG here? I thought that you just started.'
Even as I returned I learned that burns mar a rep permanent long after the scars hurt,
The thing is I could wing it as a safe-playing bitch,
Live every day like I'm already in a ditch,
Piss no-one off, act overly-reformed, fight no foe, neither rebel nor snitch,
But what the fuck do you all know about the younger me and the long-lost wish,
That some day this minnow would be preyin' on fish,
That I'd slay all the sharks, lead the dolphins on a mission, wasn't winning competitions it was bein' brilliant and resilient,
It was helping the whole police force more than they'd ask of a general civilian,
I've seen corruption on sites, Moderation teams you'd conclude were Sicilian,
I've seen lax mods, crack-snorting lapse-in-judgement scat mods,
I've seen users pledge allegiance, snitch on no one, threatened-with-bans-just-to-turn-'em-into-rat mods
I've seen white-knight polite, sycophant lost souls, weak-back mods,
Seen the envy in the dark-knight ban me just because I'm back mods,
Seen the tyrants blaring sirens just to make the people have their back mods,
I just said 'back mods' three times and it's still skilled as fuck; that rational-madman gambler faking fear, you go all-in up against my full-house; whack odds.
Honestly, I don't regret the shit I stirred on this site,
I'm a Sith in the night, in the day a Jedi Knight,
I harness the darkness, bring out the worst in the scum,
I'm the troll who out-trolled the anti-troll-troll of DDO, think of the levels that I'm on, bitch run,
You don't know 'bout the history, only know official stories,
I could sit here having not inspired many of the updates, the block button been a whore to the mods as those that abhor me love to call me,
Instead I am a rebel, a highly-disciplined devil, I'm not asking for glory, don't applaud me or award medals,
Just gimme #1 debater, as I invert a gangbang and fuck all of my haters,
I dirtied myself for the right amount and right reasons, so Vader,
Come again and choke-hold me, I'll eat you for dinner later,
Take that as kinky because threats are outlawed and what-not,
But understand the kingpin of exposing threats to the site by taking them on's coming in hot,
So if I end up eventually permabanned, I'll admit I suck and my rep should rot,
But if not I played it perfect, as risky as a justifiably rational-playstyle coulda got,
I will never be a simpleton and never be a bot,
I'm the one to bring the kneedpads out and BITE OFF A MOD's COCK,
So before you think you know my thinking, think you're a Pimp to this itty bitty thot,
You better put in the work, 'cause when it comes to endurance I'm the nitty gritty God.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
It does completely stop the ability to mention the other party actually.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I don't think you know how rap battles work but I accept the criticism and see that I'm seen that way through your eyes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I have a very particular taste in comedy. Justifying this by saying SNL does it isn't the way to go. I don't actually hate the story, you'd know if I hated it but I am fairly certain that only Castin genuinely enjoys it... Maybe Outplayz too s they got similar sense of humour.
I'm not saying N, it's not stupid, I'm saying I don't like it.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't like how you portrayed me in the story. I have extreme elegance and strategy to what I do. You made me seem like some knuckleheaded alpha male barbarian.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
Please permaban all bullies of you and I.
Created: