Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
Whenever something is borderline, default to considering it sufficient
I don't agree but, both because the average human being is of a bad debating-capacity and of IQ that I consider below properly functional and because many users here are here to let off steam and not to think hard, I accept that the majority will benefit from this and will say I agree to 'not want' this but accept its existence as being an anti-me pro-populace policy.
Whenever you remove a vote, explain, very briefly, how the voter could improve
Agree. I also support an interactive manual and game-like quiz to gain voting rights.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Bsh1 should be demoted to normal mod under someone like Virtuoso he shouldn't be 'overthrown' in the sense people here are trying to make happen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SAYING ABOUT ME? REALLY? I AM NOT SAYING THAT.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bsh1
I support 0 anonymity and support 'report spam' to be a violation in itself that only mods can report to the head mod and which only the head mod can justify and deal with in itself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
To @ two people at once put a comma between the names. Maximum 5 per post.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
That's actually a good attack on bsh1 that is genuinely a new flaw in his moderation not brought up before and something I would agree is bad moderating lacking communication to the punished.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@1harderthanyouthink
Why not vote 'disagree' then? You support the status quo, yes?
Created:
Posted in:
Belly dance name... I'm not confused or really laughing at having a stage name for that business, I'm confused why it's your real first name.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
drafterman, in the OP here, admitted my theory was true. It was him who was spamming those.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
@Vaarka
@Vader
@disgusted
@Alec
Please vote.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
@David
@Imabench
@1harderthanyouthink
@Tejretics
Please vote.
Created:
Posted in:
And I am not contradicting my 'don't say sorry to the peasants' post. Castin is no peasant. ;)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
Then I'm sorry and surprised and based on previous behavior I'll genuinely gamble that I was wrong in your intent here.
Created:
Posted in:
Thanks all for proving me right about the silent supporters that the dissenters are ignoring the population-size of when saying everyone hates bsh1.
Created:
Posted in:
Uh oh. I didn't say I'd do anything, I said if he genuinely is feeling bad out of guilt, he'll feel worse the more he taunts and insults me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Do not worry, you will be feeling worse the more often you call me such things in the end.
Created:
Posted in:
I am confused why you feel that I need to justify a block to you or anyone and why you feel you know the full extent of my motive in absence of me doing so but mind-read all you please. If I am a coward, I am a coward. Then what?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Initiating in reaction to a block explains how it's both.
Created:
@Wylted
I can explain this even though I am genuinely autistic in a high-functioning manner and completely enjoyed the compliment you made to us at the end of your first paragraph.
The idea behind it is that they are helping humanity and the world as a whole by the hurting, they are operating with a system less self-oriented than yours or mine and in fact even autistic people would decide to do it if they felt morally obligated enough to do so, I would know.
Created:
Posted in:
You can try to justify it all you want, but there is only one sensible reason to block somebody and that is because you fear what they will say to you. If there was an alternative reason it would have already been mentioned. You can try making up an alternate explanation now though.
I blocked you because I'm not going to give you the power to ping me if I can't do the same to you. This is like when you were a child, and you had that thing happen to you, you was too afraid to talk about.
Created:
Posted in:
Yes, terrified.
Do remind me when you'll unblock me, good sir.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Since I posted it here, those who would initially have voted 'neither' hopefully will catch on and instead of my problem it shall become yours.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
While the latter is more passionate, I do not see an actual difference other than an excuse to separate two approaches to disagreeing for the sake of 'agree' appearing as a bigger slice of the pie.
Created:
Posted in:
@Wylted
If I were a coward I wouldn't be engaging you or drafterman here. I'd be sitting in a corner sucking my thumb whispering 'if only I didn't have the stigma attached to my name' 'if only I could post without Tyrone calling me insane, wylted saying i'm this or that and other joining in and laughing as goldtop kicks me in the emotional ribs' but instead I say 'no, RM, you're done being a pussy, get out there and speak your fucking mind or get banned trying.'
You just blocked me, am I gonna call you a coward? No, you're entitled to fear me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
Or what? From what I see godltop is entirely entiteld to harass me for 100 posts straight where I beg him to stop.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Anyone who votes neither is just a soft-disagree-user and you are trying to split the population to make agree seem more of a majority or less of a minority than it is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
No idea what you mean? You need to block me to stop me being able to do that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
That's fine. Enjoy the solitude.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
Okay I've had about enough of you. Acting like my buddy one minute and a taunter the next. Enjoy the block experience.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@EtrnlVw
The conscious experience can never be explained or communicated. It can have the result of it (the shown personality) transposed onto an artificial intelligence replica of a person (more feasible means of 'immortality' without having the problem of overpopulation or people fighting over who gets to live or not) but there is no way to genuinely show others you actually have an experienced personhood looking out from the inside of your eyes no matter what words you use or actions you do.
Created:
Posted in:
Disagree actually would agree to the opposite type of replacement.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Goldtop
thanks for proving me spot on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Logical-Master
It can but Tyrone is yet to be banned.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
threatening with mod action? add that to the list.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tyrone
Am I? Interesting. I can't call people sociopaths but you can call me insane? Let's test that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Option 3 is the easiest to dispute unless you'd do it for all drunk drivers or rather for drivers drunk to a certain level of alcohol intensity irregardless of them killing.
Option 2 is interesting as there's so much grey area and 'ignorance defence' being impossible there means you'd be killing those who didn't have intent on top of the morality of saying we can determine who can and can't fuck based on what they have or don't have (why don't we ban people with Down's from reproducing and Autism too and a whole series of snowball effects of making such a law come to mind).
Aside from that, your first one must include attempted murder 100% and I never understood why rape and kidnapping cases are considered less severe than murder (they're worse in my eyes unless the murder was gory and/or slow.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
You are not, you're undermoderating.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Logical-Master
Then tell to me why they can and apparently 'should' allow goldtop and zeichen who are sole-bullies to run rampage but clamp down hard on other users?
Did you even see what Tyrone posted? The guy who agrees with you posted vile, racist vitriol yesterday intentionally trying to aggravate some users so his buddy Thett and a couple others could ROFL at their sake.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@1harderthanyouthink
Your opinion on bsh1 is?
Created: