Total posts: 19,931
-->
@ILikePie5
LOL! No comeback available, so you say:
this is why you will never be president
Because I don't brown-nose the mods? Gladly happy not to be pres then, you moron look what you voted in.
Do not need your advice on presidency here or how to determine a fucking human user from a bot xD.
Anybody who votes for a president more so or less so based on finding humour in a shitshow by the mods has no clue what the President is; a counterbalance to the mods.
You are lashing out because you have no idea that Shila referred sarcastically to Ravenclaws being in the book. I cannot fathom the stupidity...
Created:
Posted in:
So far, I wasnt messed with in this thread other than some nonsense from badger.
Badger was messed with by coal and vice versa and Avery messed with all.
So, all I see is avery's theory is only self fulfilling because she decided that I am fun to mess with.
Thanks for the advice, life coach. I am pretty sure I am okay.
Created:
Shila literally trolled the mod team and half this website to think she is a bot LOL
I know she is doing this act on purpose
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
That is top tier trolling. If you do not catch her sarcasm and trolling, that is on you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I agree. If she can reform the toxicity, there is no issue
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Elliott
And what if your area does not have it and you are bursting?
Urinating outside cannot damage health unless ingested or if someone pisses on your cavities a lot. We are not discussing a golden showers or watersports kink.
Get realistic.
Created:
-->
@SirAnonymous
Do you support the censorship?
Created:
-->
@Vader
The time and schedule to which they post is always the same.
This is a sign it's a human who is a very Type-A personality, not that it's a bot which could post any time of the day overall, regardless of the regular or irregular spare time the runner had.
Created:
-->
@Athias
It's more like 'why the fuck is the president not here to do this instead of me' than a campaign.
Created:
-->
@Vader
Dude you are being stupid, not Novice and I. Shila literally read sources, viewed Youtube videos, used info on profiles and integrated them into insults and banter.
Created:
-->
@Mharman
I'm not getting into this too much today, but I'll post more tomorrow when I have more time. In short, I believe Shila to be a chatbot based on inhuman behavior, including:-An incredibly high posts per day average-A seemingly very specific posting schedule-A slew of posts and statements that are not related to the posts it responded to-An incapability to do anything on a webpage where there is no immediately accessible text box to write in-A seemingly nonexistent day off since account creation-A higher than normal focus on analyzing other users' profiles to make judgmentsThere a few smaller behaviors and other things that give me reason to believe it's a bot, which I'll talk about tomorrow. Real quick, to respond to your point about how it behaves to users that have blocked it. It is very possible for a chatbot to have programming that will simply go around a block, especially if it has been given the series of conversation steps and machine learning that even the most basic chatbots require. In fact, a less ethical programmer seeking to create a chatbot has every motivation to include such a feature. I would argue that any programmer that unleashes a forum chatbot on a site like this does not have any good intentions.
there is nothing you posted that is what a chatbot would do.
Shila literally interacted in ways only a human could unless we are saying an AI capable of comprehending banter, sarcasm, reading inside sources and mocking what's inside, snippeting to twist someone's meaning and consistently producing wordings that are unique (try to google most of what Shila writes, you can't find the way it's worded on other forums meaning she's actually more original than the average user, not less).
All you noticed is that the user has a lot of spare time.
Created:
Shila has made several insulting and aggravating posts to users, that it the trolling style of this user (who sometimes identifies as female but on profile has 'unknown' as gender).
The moderation team have assumed she/they is/are a bot based solely on a rumour. The user interacts in ways that imply 100% sentience and human capacity to interpret things. Shila has even referred to profile pics on profiles in a way that only an extremely advanced AI could infuse into the banter she/they is/are employing.
Shila is wrongly muted and if I were the site president right now, I would be opposing this ban (which may be coming) or mute (at present) as wrong reasoning.
The correct reason to handle Shila is that the user's posts are consistently designed to aggravate other users to severe levels whereby the only way out is to ignore the user.
To prove Shila is not a bot, another aspect to the trolling which is a problematic habit only a human could have is that even if you've blocked her, she/they will quote you and reply to you, proving that it's a human as a bot would be unable to post to the forums since blocking 'backfires' the send button if @ing the user.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
We cannot discuss that yet, it counts as campaigning.
This thread is actually a tease.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
I was suddenly logged out on my computer, does this mean that I got hacked? I ususally stay logged in.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
No. Narcissistic... Not a narcissist, only humans can be narcissists officially.
God of the Bible does not overestimate his infinite abilities and intellect, his narcissistic tendencies are in what he demands as what he sees as a ego-fuelling reward for said abilities.
So, I will lose if it officially that he is a classical narcissist.
Created:
Posted in:
Yes, there is nothing wrong with the human body at all, we are animals.
Even other animals do not overly associate being naked with being sexual.
However, I am not here to advocate nudity, I am aware that most get insecure about it and even I enjoy good fashion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Even you can need a piss really badly one day without cash on you. It can just happen to anyone.
Better hope you are sneaky enough to avoid the fine. If you can't afford the fine, you are considered to have criminal charges and even then they can push it to charges if they feel like it.
This is true for almost any country but some countries have more corruption amongst cops and go even meaner on the poor.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Shit objectively stinks worse than urine does and unlike urine this happens:
- Slight amount of shit is extremely stinky and nauseating, a medium to high amount of urine all one one area is where it starts to get smelly.
- The real problem with human faeces is they are actually toxic unless the person is on a very raw vegan diet and even then it depends on their intolerances. Humans are omnivores overall and are eating processed foods these days, that's actually why humans have some of the stinkiest shit. The reasons cows and horses have shit that smells worse is they ferment grass so it's like why beer stinks except it's also excrement on top. Human 'shit' will genuinely harm, mar etc most things whereas even very acidic human urine is only harmful to let's say a tree or bush if you really go at it again and again while dehyrated (several people to the same plant daily). In low quantity urine is actually healthy and good for plant growth it actually increases soil fertility for almost all plants because of nitrates within the urine (not to be confused with nitrites).
- The final issue is that stools/shits/faeces don't themselves erode/weather away nearly as well as urine does. Unlike herbivores, carnivores and omnivores have stools that have a very long-lasting nature to them. Even vegetarians if they eat processed food will have this partly too. It sticks, lasts long, the smell carries strong and far and is a major issue.
- Outside of diarrhea instances, we need to urinate far more often than shit (it's healthy to shit just once every 2-3 days but it's healthy to urinate four times a day minimum, needing less implies dehydration or kidney issues and more than 6 starts to signify other organ issues which can of course include kidney). This makes it far less inhumane to definitively demand someone find a private place to defecate as a regular demand, when compared with urinating, especially if they are homeless.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Let me tell you what I predict will be the argument:
Have you ever smelt an inner-city stench of piss in a tunnel or well-hidden alleyway?
My reply:
Why do you think they are all pissing in the tunnel? That's why it stinks so bad.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
It's scraping the barrel until you're out there needing it.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
I am extremely sure that the reason that abortion-having women in a pro-choice place like a Scandinavian nation would be more likely to die a year later is that most are poor.
Let me explain; in those nations it's public-funded to get an abortion so the poor can actually afford it and are the most likely to get it as they are the most likely to not have the sufficient lifestyle room or finances to raise a child.
Being poor doesn't kill oneself but the environment of poorer areas is such that the edge found is explainable by that.
Created:
Posted in:
I just find the whole idea inhumane, not only the homeless but especially so.
I am absolutely as a cop I'd feel sick inside to have to arrest a desperate person who pissed onto a bush or whatever.
I am not discussing exposing one's genitals in a very public manner, I am discussing specifically the crime of pissing in public, urination in and of itself.
Created:
Posted in:
You're going to keep getting trolled and harassed until you heed those basic life lessons.
That's alright, I prefer me than someone it can truly break. I know how to handle it and get the wrongdoers punished if it's needed. Sometimes, like when a certain someone harassed me on the PMs, blocking the idiot and letting them be is more worthwhile than driving the toxic mess to create a new account.
People assume I do it as a 'don't fuck with me' thing but it's also out of principle. Either everyone is equally allowed to harass everyone or nobody should be, it's pretty simple.
Created:
Posted in:
You really need to:(1) Learn to let things go(2) Not be so sensitiveYour entire existence on DDO and Dart has been riddled with doing the opposite of those two things. So many of your issues with imabench and the general DDO and Dart community wouldn't exist if you hardened up mentally. You're going to keep getting trolled and harassed until you heed those basic life lessons.
Number 1 is relevant, number 2 is questionable.
If I'm sensitive, I introspect and let go of the toxic emotions later but some anger is useful; the world will push you around like a ragdoll if you're only passive, especially as a man or boy.
If I'm failing to let something go it's often because i've resisted being sensitive and to solve it I need to decompress pent up rage into sadness, pain and even jealousy and come to terms with what I really feel to then deal with those emotions.
So, in other words the solution to letting go is to become sensitive first and the solution to reducing net sensitivity is to let things go.
I don't resent my sensitivity, it lets me feel alive. I do wonder sometimes what emotionless people even feel like on a daily basis, it must be hell to live through.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Make the debate and I will discuss definitions and such in the comments.
Created:
That would explain why he appointed himiphobic supreme court judges and why every single homophobe in America most likely voted Trump both elections (primaries included)
Created:
Posted in:
I mean, I don't really care what people here think of me irl. So, if you think I'm a loser irl, it literally is 0 fucks given by me.
This is a combination of you not mattering to my ego and also specifically me seeing what toxic and bitter people your crowd are from DDO days; ready to dig in and backstab each other whenever it suits your agendas.
Just look how Coal and Badger are at it but no doubt they'd act besties in the past or whatever. Even I participated in the fakeness of it all but I had to, I wanted to get unbanned and figured befriending the scumbags that got me banned was one way to do it, turned out it wasn't and they overall thought ill of me anyway.
If you think I am a loser irl, that is fine. If you think I am a winner irl, I'd worry for you as you couldn't possibly know enough to idolise me that way.
Even irl, even my closest people be they relatives or spouse (or best friend etc) do not matter to my ego to the extent they could break me (I ensure that with regular introspection, meditation etc). I am at total peace with people thinking ill of me, the only time it will bother me and has bothered me is when and if their thoughts can get me punished or really ruin my reputation, those are rumours and toxic thoughts to nip in the bud ASAP. Otherwise, I couldn't care less.
It is better to be thought of a loser and be a winner than the opposite, at least that's what my life taught me.
Your only focus should be on being a winner in your own eyes, period. Not just a winner but a disciplined, admirable individual that can sleep comfortably with who he/she is and wake up just as unashamed. I do not care if other left-wingers are boring and insecure nor do I care what this OP is about quite honestly.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
If I am allowed to include the old testament in my analysis of God, I will argue God is narcissistic but I want huge time leniency and us to debate it a bit later on (I am getting rather busy irl now).
I want genuinely 2 week Rounds because I will need to not only collect a lot of bible verses in my analysis but make sure I don't accidentally plagiarise things from elsewhere.
Created:
-->
@Shila
Yes Shila, that's definitely what I'm doing there.
Created:
-->
@Tejretics
Oh dear, you're breaking the hearts of minimalistic noobsnipers :(
I guess it depends how the bright flames and purple dinosaurs take it, since they determine the winners overall.
Created:
I do hope that nobody believes Coal's YT links over actions of what Trump has actually done:
Created:
Yes but she is less of an asshole than she would have been raising an unwanted child and emotionally neglecting or even abusing it.
I think her rejecting meeting the child makes sense and is actually a bold move that too few biological sperm or egg and womb donors mistake as if they are denying their biological parental duty to not do.
If she meets the daughter, it will either result in disappointment and anger or it will deeply hurt the child that she was rejected by this decent woman, either way it is bound to get toxic and problematic. By not meeting the daughter, she is able to stay an unidentified entity that the daughter can choose to hate or like but not deeply either way.
There is an argument to meet the daughter but it is only worth it if the mother is dedicated to stay part of the daughter's life, which would be at the father's mercy and maybe she has reason to doubt he would allow that long-term.
Mocking her having PTSD from the experience is the real ashsoleove and is some right wing ignorance of mental health at play (they think only war veterans are allowed to say they have PTSD)
Created:
-->
@Shila
Thank you Shila and how many personalities do you have on different accounts and forums?
Created:
RM thinks he's Superman
I am more like Arrow, if I had to pick a DC universe character who has a personality I can relate to but I preferred the Flash series or what I've seen of it that is (not really into the comics themselves).
Created:
RM thinks he's Superman, Jesus Christ.
I'd rather have been Superman than Jesus Christ but unfortunately I was born a human in touch with god so I am closer to being the latter.
Created:
Posted in:
15 of the hijackers that were involved with the attack were all from Saudi, 2 from UAE, neither nation got a drop of hostility from Bush.
Created:
Posted in:
Saudi Arabia, the nation where the 9/11 plane fliers both came from and where 0 strikes from Bush were aimed.
Fantastic ally, there is nothing suspicious. They exemplify how to treat women, LGBTQ, their fellow Islamic nation such as Yemen and most importantly, they are absolutely dedicated to a national policy of zero democracy or liberation.
Saudi, America's best friend.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405
I have an attitude that tends to bring out people's hidden selves, be they good, bad, charming or ugly alike.
I think it is to do with my raw communication style.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405
Equally on par in what sense? Since you don't interact with the 1v1 debating arena, I assume you mean the forum part of the website. There's all sorts, through from big bad Reddit itself (as well as Quora) to DebateIsland to basically any forum on any niche topic you want. What makes this website unique (now the DDO is dead) is its dedication to the wide array of debate topics and the 1v1 arena.
Honestly, if you ask me, the issue is that debating is an extremely niche passion that barely anyone in this generation is into. Most people see arguing as bad social skills and see debating as a pseudohobby that only argumentative pricks take. You prove them right on that and in some ways we all do. People generally prefer to seek out people that agree with them, those of us wired to seek out disagreement and enjoy it are often too dumb or ruthless to maintain it as a healthy hobby.
That was what made DDO unique and what makes this website unique enough, if the voting department was more active and better moderated.
If the 1v1 arena was actually popular and not a silly niche that barely anybody on the website uses and this website somewhere that barely anyone on the Internet uses, we'd see a healthier environment but outlying opinions and very harsh pushers of offensive opinion like yourself would be shunned to the outskirts.
So, the optimal population would be in the hundreds, not the thousands, in my opinion. We'd want around 250 dedicated, regular posters.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
are you joking or gaslighting rn?
Shila has voted on novice's and my debates and had her votebombs removed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Uragirimono
Actually, especially in a left wing society, that smoker has now wasted vital taxpayer-funded resources by their lifestyle decision.
So, even more so in a caring society, the chronic smoker should be shunned (not bullied but definitely made to feel regret for what they did).
More important than shaming is awareness. When it comes to safe sex, conservatives backfire their plans by making foreplay and safe sex a taboo topic. That is why conservative cultures worldwide have by far the most severe degree of unwanted pregnancies until they do some one child policy type thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Uragirimono
So your belief is the standard "consent to sex is consent to pregnancy" it seems. Consent has to be given to someone. Tell me, while I'm undressing (and giving consent to sex to the man in front of me) who am I giving the consent to pregnancy to?
You do not get to consent your way out of biology. Laws of science trump (pun unintended) social conventions. Get a contraceptive device, pill ir someyhing if you are deadset on non-condom sex.
I am not a conservative, I do not have anything against healthy indulgence in porn, masturbation and foreplay.
If you want to have penetrative sex, be fully aware of the consequences. If not, it would be eugenics for me to encourage you to remove your genepool, irresponsible or not, from our species.
I am not bere to debate as such, this thread asked for a non-religious reason to oppose abortion. I aced it from my first post.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Uragirimono
The irresponsible pregnancy would speak for itself, it is a shame the men can stay anonymous as the shame is actually a good motivator to gain self control.
The reason I matured since being some impulsive, arrogant teen is that the shame and lack of ego associated with being a purely impulsive idiot motivated me to grow into a mature adult and even then it is a constant reminder and demotivator for me to be an impulsive anarchic fool. I am sure without laws and public opinion that we would be wild primates like chimpanzees, no order or ethics beyond compulsive ocd or impulsive empathy.
We are our rawer selves as children and teens as well as very young adults. It is the urge to be proud of who we are and ashamed of the vices we give into that pushes us to slowly and gradually mature constantly until we hit that age when very elderly where we again stop giving a fuck.
Condoms only fail if ripped, logically. Which partner ripped it or was the product manufactures subpar to be sold? If it was a size thing, I maybe somewhat get it but really to kill a human solves very little of your issues as a man ir woman.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
It was never legal or moral to abort slaves. Roe V. Wade was passed way after slavery was abolished.
It was legal and condidered socially ethically acceptable in the past. Ethnosupremacist slavery is, in fact, a deeply human impulse and has been culturally around from Ancient Egypt if nit before in less recorded variants.
It is up to us to fight that impulse and be decent.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Uragirimono
It not only solves it but your nonchalant slaughter of a human inside you has left you with just as slutty a lifestyle (man or woman can both be sluts) just as little self control and the systemic issues that led you to act it out without contraception or resulting in thinking you could not reproduce and raise or give the child up for adoption are all still there.
Think twice before hitting third base with someone, the pressure to have sex disappears later in life for a reason and I do not mean menopause. When people are more mature, they start to realise that penetrative sex is fine, it is a good addition to first and second base and is a nice experience if done right. You do not need to engage in unsafe sex to enjoy life. Get out of gangbang culture and any unsafe variant if swinging culture if you can. These ways of life are ruining people emotionally.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Uragirimono
So, there is actually not only an atheistic reason why but a left-wing reason why:
The solution is never ever long-term in eliminating the fetus.
Bring up any reason for an abortion at all and you will find that the root cause is actually able to be pushed aside and fought back against less intensely if abortion is a way out of it.
That doesn't mean that it shouldn't be avaiable necessarily, what it means is there exists a logical reason why.
Created:
Weak. You did not even reply.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@CoolApe
This has barely anything at all to do with marriage but it is indeed due to shifts in culture and promiscuity.
Because of shifts in culture and social media where the women are finding it much easier to get tinder hookups from the hottest guy in town no-strings-attached and then, via social networking or even as I said tinder itself to alter their profile more serious and use photo touch-ups etc as well as popularity to win over high value males, we've ended up with a society where the standards for women are such that one really hot and well-to-do guy can get 20 chicks in 3 months, fucking some of them twice for a laugh and that's literally him playing the 'game' on easy mode.
Some will read this and call me a misogynist, I wouldn't type it with my real identity attached. I am not a misogynist to notice trends in psychology and how women work and neither are the sociologists backing my theory. I am not a black pill backer, I'm a red pill backer; I don't think an ugly man with low social skills has no hope, I think it's about strategy and working your ass off to get it.
What is 'it'?
The thing is you made this OP about incels but changed it to why men are staying single.
Single vs not laid aren't the same thing anymore.
Women are valuing males much harsher than before while men are valuing females, sexually especially, just the same as before. It is females and their reaction to the shift that has caused this shift.
As I say, nowadays, one man can sexually satisfy many women and maintain a good reputation if he plays the texting game smart and just ghosts the toxic ones rather than arm them with any ammo to 'cancel' him with.
Nothing changed on the part of men, what changed is that unlike before, women are demanding more from the men to even get a fucking seat at the table without them ignoring you to text the next guy who turns up.
If you think I'm ignorant, try the dating game. I've met women who literally admit it to me and say 'why not'. I am not a fucking misogynist, I can sexually please women very well and get along with them in daily life (though I'm rather introverted), it's not about frustration at sex, it's about observing the environment. Those that don't adapt will perish, the jungle's just more social media driven than real-life contact driven now.
Created: