Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
You are a wimp. You want a hurricane to slaughter your opposition because you are not capable or bold enough to be understanding or tolerant of them while they are alive.
You have the coward's attitude.
Created:
-->
@Danielle
Not sure this is something to LOL about...
When someone hates their body that much that they pay to remove and transform entire bodyparts (excluding severe disfigurement) we must consider what it is they're trying to escape and run from with their new identity. Do most end up happier in the fantasy that they were born as the other sex? I don't know, at most I'd say 40% do and you're correct, we'll never know ever. The inner workings of a mind are only known to the individual until they choose to reveal it to others. Imagine going through all the surgery and hormone therapy for it to hit you deep down you hate yourself, so you get that next estrogen or testosterone dosage and go yaaaay now I'm 'me' again.
We live in a world now where literally if this text gets associated with the real me, my whole life can be ruined. Idk what year cancel culture officially began but this is next level. Just bullying people to stay silent and meek (me included, I'm just gambling that this stays here) it's just bullying us into silence so imagine how cancel culture affects those that regret it.
They're scared shit of being taunted by both transphobes and pro-trans people at once if they admit how much they regret it. They convinced their family to accept they were trans and probably fought for years for that and now regret it all? That must sting so deep they keep playing out the fantasy.
Created:
-->
@Danielle
You think people who regret it let the public know or go to their official doctor about something they know can't be done?
Think psychiatrists violate confidentiality to get that data? No.
Think they take part in surveys when wanting to die? Not really, no.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Yeah, I want it to be clear this is not the normal attitude of a progressive.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Are you going to reply to the rest of what I wrote or not?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What the hell? So you literally support being a virgin to marriage? Make your stance clearer and I will trap you later with something.
For instance contraception and all things are not available to the poor with any remote ease, in America, combine that with the stigma against sex outside marriage and it gets done behind backs u protected.
So, start holding society responsible or forever have a cycle.
Out of curiosity, what is your view on abortion in those circumstances??
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable," it says on the BLM page titled "What we believe."
What are you supposed to do when so many of your men died in gang wars, ditched and were irresponsible etc?
And what of the drug-addicted mothers? I am not stereotyping here as a racist, these are real problems in all ghettos/slums/trailer-parks for all races actually in all countries.
Poor professions also involve brutal accidents, you think they get sufficiently compensated when chemicals or physical damage hurts the breadwinner's health making them depend on the others?
BLM was never just about blacks, ignore the name of it. It was about backing the underdog and unfairly treated. You can say what you want about how some use the newfound sympathy, it doesn't matter. That is like saying that because 1 person gets into something only because they are disadvantaged in X way and then use the position or privilege irresponsibly that therefore all who have their disadvantage should have the leg-up.
I am not being stupid here, I know you can say 'omg you are saying they need help, how degrading!' I already posted elsewhere that I think this new phrase "white savior complex" is only unhealthy when it leads to superficial help that barely addresses the long-term causes and roots of issues either at home or abroad. You would never hear an indian slum dweller going 'ew you upper-class Punjab saving me to feel better about yourself, pathetic savior complex' unless that person only saved them and hurt others constantly.
There is nothing wrong feeling bad for those who have it hard and that is the root of the entire left-wing philosophy, after all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
You could make an argument BLM wants to destroy the nuclear family among other cultural institutions, which is a form of cultural cleansing.
No, BLM is founded upon the principle of the black and anti-racist-non-black dads/papas etc and mum/mom/mamas etc that stuck around while the anti-BLM types went all gangster and ditched their kids. Sure some are lesbians, gays and trans without children and they were pioneers and that is not being 'anti family' it's being pro-freedom.
I say dad and mom/mum instead of just father and mother for a reason there.
It may have violent rioters saying George Floyd is why they're doing what they always did as vandals long before as antifa but the fact is BLM is about so much more and has pushed for so much since the emancipation which still left blacks severely disadvantaged in so many measurable areas of where life should be fair on us.
Created:
Posted in:
Comparing BLM to Hamas is just stupid as fuck, it's not even worth addressing but who cares I am on a forum so let's address it briefly.
The difference is primarily in the means but even the end-goal for BLM isn't annihilation of the overarching ethnicity from their vicinity whereas with Hamas it is.
This is @Coal who has blocked me, so anyone who upvoted his post is free to reply.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Funny how I see things before they come. ;)
(Inside reference)
As for this, I not only agree but told Whiteflame such a few days ago.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
You are very difficult to pinpoint.
I am only sure that you are not a ravenclaw.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I am quite sure that you'd end up in Slytherin but as you wish.
I'd end up in Ravenclaw.
I can name you some definite members on this site's house (under my understanding of the sorting hat's prioritised traits and how the houses are actually split, not the way JK Rowling explicitly says they are split) :
Gryffindor
- Barney
- Sadolite
- Lunatic
- Mesmer/Mgtowdemon/Analgesic/zarro/anotheraltforsure
- Mall
- Coal
- Danielle
- Best.Korea
- Rayhan16
- IwantRooseveltagain
- GreyParrot
Hufflepuff
- Polytheist-Witch
- Supadudz
- Castin
- MisterChris
- Dr.Franklin
- Speedrace
- Bmdrocks21
- Lemming
- Jeff_Goldblum
Ravenclaw
- Whiteflame
- Intelligence_06
- Oromagi
- Ramshutu
- Bones
- Benjamin
- 3RU7AL
- RationalMadman
- Tejretics
- Blamonkey
Slytherin
- Wylted
- Novice_II
- Ehyeh (though he would always say he is meant to be in Ravenclaw, I am certain he'd be sorted here)
- David
- BrotherDThomas
- Stephen
- Mikal
- Airmax1227
- Imabench
- Ilikepie5
- Type1/Sparrow
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Are you agreeing?
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
I did research your debate style, yes. I actually noticed that in the debates you lost, you structured more build-based and defensive.
As I say, this is nothing to do with real-world debating where persuasion matters more than arguing, on this website the judges value raw offense and arguing far higher than defense and elaboration. I will adapt to it in due course.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Slytherin was never known for its cunning, that misconception was an idea only Gryffindors and JK Rowling herself had about them.
Slytherin was all about staying true to your clan etc but unlike Hufflepuffs, it wasn't loyalty itself they valued, it was the clan excelling and doing better than others they enjoyed. So, it was justifiable to betray in the name of ambition and pride.
If you analyse the characters, Harry Potter himself was more cunning than your average Slytherin. I mean, literally look at Crabbe and Goyle (Malfoy's 2 cronies) they don't strike me as very cunning but they were indisputably slytherin for other reasons.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
Gryffindor: Bravery, Leadership, Wrath.Hufflepuff: Honesty, Loyalty, Fear.Ravenclaw: Intellect, Resourcefulness, Stubbornness (you got this one so wrong).Slytherin: Family/Friendship, Ambition, Pride.
If they played poker:
Gryffindor: Loose-Hybrid.
Hufflepuff: Hybrid-Passive.
Ravenclaw: Tight-Hybrid.
Slytherin: Hybrid-Aggressive.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Gryffindor was consistenetly the least loyal House of them all. Gryffindor was the only House where their own head of House would consistently betray them and dock their scores out of a seeking of justice over loyalty.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@K_Michael
For those who don't know:Gryffindor = Bravery, courage, determination.Hufflepuff = Loyalty, hard work, diligence.Ravenclaw = wit (clever, not funny), learning, wisdom.Slytherin = Cunning, ambition, resourcefulness.
This is not entirely correct at all.
The correct is this:
Gryffindor: Bravery, Leadership, Wrath.
Hufflepuff: Honesty, Loyalty, Fear.
Ravenclaw: Intellect, Resourcefulness, Stubbornness (you got this one so wrong).
Slytherin: Family/Friendship, Ambition, Pride.
They all have flaws and all have strengths.
Created:
Honosexuality is a disorder, I did not realise that was the part Coal had issue with.
It is a disorder that ideally harms neither the one experiencing it nor the consenting men/women they do things with. Therefore, it demands no treatment, much like high functioning autism, ADD, milder OCD and such, it is just a disorder, not inherently demanding treatment.
Created:
Posted in:
UPDATE: FF debates count as half-votes.
Conceded or partly forfeited debates count in full.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Sure, nice analogy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You've got your hobbies, I've got mine. I am one of the only members on this website trying to stop it dying and I happen to love debating competitively which is a 'sport' that barely anyone recognises because most people like barbarically arguing and not winning over third-party judges.
I do not mind what you think this is or what meaning there is to it. I would even debate with you that I am not wasting my life here as it's almost a gym session for the brain, it combines social awareness (of voters and debaters and how the debater and voters will react to things etc) with raw intellect and handling pressure if one pushes their limits in how many debates they're in at once.
You have to handle a lot of things here that translate well into the real world; such as handling unfair losses and no-vote ties. It's a great thing, it's like mental Karate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You cannot and that is hardly demeaning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Nope. You can vote regardless.
Created:
-->
@Shila
You are correct. I have a lot to still prove.
It is time to stop goofing off. I have had years to research voters that I wasted goofing off.
Created:
Posted in:
Blocked users, by me, are not exempted from the credit system.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
@Intelligence_06
@Bones
@Ehyeh
@Lair77
All are welcome. All 4 votes can be against me. You lose more and win less rating against me if I am rated low, making a selfish reason to not abuse that element.
Created:
Posted in:
I get to negotiate description and settings.
No shit like making me support pedophilia or racism.
I have no-gos and will not take a suicide topic.
You are free to make it unrated, I have no say in that.
The deal is your 4 votes are there at the end. If you do not have a valid vote on one of the 4 by the end, your count is deducted.
I will be debating often enough that 4 is attainable again and again.
The number can be docked to 3 or even 2 during myself and the site's less busy periods.
There are no strings attached, you pick the side and the topic.
The credit is permanent or until I truly quit (or am incapacitated, extremely stressed irl etc). 4 votes, from 3 days before this on my debates and I debate you on almost anything, rated or unrated.
4 equals 1, rap battles and such are not guaranteed for me to accept, I am refining and climbing debating now.
Created:
I understand the following:
- This site is on life support. The dead userbase do not enjoy voting.
- Voters tend to prefer you attacking opponents' ideas so much so that offense is defense because if the opponent stays defensive, voters either do not vote or vote against the defender.
- To launch successful attacks, stick to semantics, get the opponent furious as you gaslight them about what they are really trying to say and tell voters that the opponent has dropped points, constantly, even if the point is shit.
- Learn and practise this method so much so that one can do it across 18 debates at once pote tially. Just read what the opponent says, link it wrongly to definitions, write antithetical contentions and syllogisms even if rebuttals are ruled out. As in make your constructive inherently attack theirs 'accidentally, and never waste effort preemptively defending.
- Over time, you will find that the impulsive members who have the passion to vote, vote for you because they fall in love with your way of attacking.
- Avoid accepting challenges from tough opponents, let them come to you, learn to debate ordinary topics ridicupously aggressive and well. Nearly plagiarise ideas from the cookie cutter round 1s and then just stick to pure offense.
I predict this approach is actually the best.
If you notice, all bad debaters have different things making them bad but all good-rated debaters here are either accidentally or intentionally adhering to this ethos, just focusing less on quantity (except Novice).
I will be surprised if my analysis is proven wrong. Do expect some losses incoming, after that, watch me annihilate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Are you saying it is not just Republicans who see blacks are biologically inferior to whites?Anyone who believes this today is a Republican. Not all Republicans are racists, but all racists are Republicans.
Out of curiosity what do you see blacks that only or are least severely/primarily want their family to marry, hire, work with and socialise with blacks ideally and only tolerate whites because they have to in the western societies?
What do you call the Asians that are like that?
What if they vote left-wing?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Shila, you have an interesting profile pic. Do you agree?
Created:
I have researched and this is still the case. Almost exactly the same. In fact Nord has a speed edge it didn't before, now, thanks to the Nordlynx encryption method.
Nord also allows split-tunneling now but I do believe that it's better to 'totally encrypt' your raw connection, exceptions lead to issues potentially.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
by the book gaslighting, except it's so see-through it backfires.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
I don't lack fear because I'm good, I am a madman. I lack fear out of a pricipled resistance to letting my fears enslave me.
I am ready to be one of the lowest ranked debaters on the website and endure that shame and work my way up again.
This is not my living/career, this is a hobby and done for the sheer journey. So, I truly will face anybody but I don't want a topic that I know I'll lose on the side I'm on out of sheer unfairness or voter bias, that just isn't fun.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
I don't do that to any members out of fear Shila. Do you want to debate me on the Mike Tyson thing?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
@Intelligence_06
@Undefeatable
@ComputerNerd
@Ehyeh
In all honesty though,this thread is a pitiful example of the shit tier morale and attitude.
You say let us get someone to defeat Barney and everyone jeers, then when someone says fuck yeah let us do it, you all gang on the one issuing the challenge to pussy out of it.
I am not cowering oytt though, this is all pathetic to watch. Either encourage the showdowns or shut the absolute fuck up about Barney being better. You want battles? Make them happen and let the results over many battles do the talking. That will incite me to try my apex best.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
There were only 5 or so posts linked to in the mideration log, all of which were backing bs fabrications in terms of what you said they did.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
So let him issue the challenge.
Hell, why don't you issue it.
At worst, I improve after the loss. At best, hahaha, I will let you have a small nightmare about it... Delicate oromagi and his slanted resolutions...
I will defeat you on this though, since it is basially completely factually in my favour.
Every single person they say I harassed opposed my ban, even long after it they were confused. That tells you enough.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Thank you Shila, that is definitely good advice.
Please enlighten me how to do that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Made me laugh irl, thanks genuinely.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Cool, make as many excuses as you want. You asked me to issue the challenge and then pussied out.
You are welcome to issue me one. I am deleting the challenge now as we have all seen who the one that is afraid is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Terran_01
How am I lying or gaslighting?
Some men look very different without facial hair, the nose appears to be his nose in that blurry ID pic but it could be another man, yes.
I do not know the full story. What I do know is you followed him aggressively, even threatened him. That is on your own video recording.
I also wish to note that you have not made a patreon or gofundme page it would seem, for the lifesaving cause on your behalf.
Created:
-->
@Shila
Are you avery?
Created:
I have no objection to any adult's conscious choice to harm their body in any way they desire to do so, whether voluntary consumption of dangerous substances of any kind, voluntary bodily modification of any kind and the like. For example, I have no objection to adult's voluntary consumption of any substance whatsoever, whether it's pot, heroin, meth or depo provera. Likewise, I have no objection to any adult's voluntary choice to undergo any bodily modification, whether it's plastic surgery, piercings, gauges, obnoxious tattoos or sex change operations.
How the fuck is heroin and meth being compared to weed and tattoos?
Get some perspective, heroin and meth are fucking life-destroying. Anyone who doesn't hate them is scum to me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Shila
Can't beat a guy who runs away, it's against my code of ethics.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Terran_01
What Shila just did is actual gaslighting.
What you are saying I am doing is not.
I watched some more of the video now, out of respect for you. I do find it very peculiar that only the police vids on your facebook showed that 'community guidelines' thing and I would believe there is an agenda behind that.
I am not certain, though, that the guy who claims he was there to inspect your smoke alarm detector was lying. He knew you would never let him in and you live on public property under a special arrangement, so he picked a time when you were out to be let in by other residents there.
Your 'baseball bat' comment was more banter (not sensitive banter to you but he didn't know you were recording him) that if you'd start some shit, he'd use it in defense. If you follow the conversation they thought and maybe still think that you weren't just involved with Anonymous but were some further terrorist (this is not me accusing you, that was the banter or semi-genuine theory that he and the woman had, idk if the other man bought into it or not).
It was obviously deceptive, he came when you were out on purpose, no doubt. The problem is that you never let the smoke alarm inspector do his job and that was public property, so he didn't know what to do.
Then, when he came the next year for the annual inspection, you chased him, trying to find his registration plates and wanting his full name and everything. He is scared of you, he believes you are a dangerous man that hates him, he obviously was fronting saying he'd hurt you but he may have indeed acted in self defense. You were the one who said you'd grab a weapon (which was your way of referencing to him mentionig a baseball bat etc).
His job is to inspect that property, he seems to have a job beyond just smoke alarms there. He took pictures of the outside of your property. I don't see how it could be used or what you believe he did wrong.
The fact is that I am not here doubitng you underwent the torture, I truly can never know. That is your story and your account of events. I will never dare tell you that you are wrong as I don't know you, Jeremy Martin or what you truly went through in that asylum.
I am just saying that you have assumed the whole system is against you, it may not be the case. I don't know enough to know if surgery and diagnosis were needed. That's between you and the specific people involved.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Terran_01
so, to understand you correctly, I am the evil one here out of everybody here?
I actually listened to some amount of your video and tried to explain what I understood of it to others. I actually voted on the debate as I saw was the way to vote on it.
Others ignored you all along and I am the evil one? I am the asshole? I am the corrupt one? Every breath I take, your soul dies a little more? Is that a death threat or what?
What is it you even want exactly?
Created: