Shila

, I just dont see how am I more evil than Hitler

Trump should donate 90% of the money he stole from George Snuffleupagus.

It's not addictive. That's a psyop

So we need to see the democrats stand up to the leftists in their own party in order to trust them with a single payer solution. We also need to be able to trust them to put people first and not be needs who try to quantify the value of a human life with their healthcare rationing proposals. 

Ideally everyone is a smoker, not some chain smoker who cant breathe, but someone who can enjoy a cigarette a day with their evening coffee and relaxation.

Think of it this way. There is no evidence for the non existence of the spirit of God. There is no known evidence for the non existence. There is none. So why believe the subject is non existent anyway?

You shouldn't when you remain neutral or agnostic.

The burden of proof’s on existence, or ‘what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all?’

Where would it end if people were justified in killing people who disagreed with them and were classified as evil.?

I think that's a relevant point. However what if we can clearly differentiate between evil and good and only allowed people who accurately determined if somebody was evil was killed?

Let me know what you think.

Ok do you believe the spirit of God as mentioned in John 4:24, exists?I’m 

Are Muslim countries more prone to violence? - SAGE Journals

place in Muslim countries, and they all involved Islamist insurgents. The same was the case in 2011. For 2014 the fraction of conflicts occurring in Muslim countries was lower (60%), but still way abo...

Wikipedia

Religious war - Wikipedia

A religious war or a war of religion, sometimes also known as a holy war (Latin: sanctum bellum), is a war

In that case, I'd hope it would expose the bad colleges while showing the merit of the good ones. With acceptance rates out the window, the burden falls on colleges themselves to generate good results.

It's because you are a performer 

Caitlyn Clark disagrees. As one of the very few good white WNBA players, it's clearly due to her skin color.

If you say so.

It appears that  in the other 3 gospels that verses 9 - 20 were much later additions.  Which , it appears, to have ignored the warning in  Revelation about adding or taking away from scripture, if my memory serves me ?

The famous sex researchers Masters and Johnson [1,2] have concluded that size of the male penis can have no true physiological effect on female sexual satisfaction. They base this conclusion on their physiological studies that show that the vagina adapts to fit the size of the penis. Because of this vaginal adaptation, they refer to the vagina as a potential space rather than an actual space. Thus, despite the worries of many males about the size of their penis, Masters and Johnson concluded that any size penis will fit and provide adequate sexual stimulation to the female.

false premise.

I think individuals and groups by nature and nurture, have more or less advantages, depending on their environments.

You are being disingenuous. The John verse mentions nothing at all concerning the Judas kiss only that Judas "stood there with them" saying nor doing anything. But it dose clearly state that Jesus identified himself twice!

John 18.

4 Jesus, knowing all that was going to happen to him, went out and asked them, “Who is it you want?”

5 “Jesus of Nazareth,” they replied.

“I am he,” Jesus said. (And Judas the traitor was standing there with them.) 6 When Jesus said, “I am he,” they drew back and fell to the ground.

7 Again he asked them, “Who is it you want?”

“Jesus of Nazareth,” they said.

8 Jesus answered, “I told you that I am he. If you are looking for me, then let these men go.”

It can hardly be the case that Jesus would have needed to identify himself twice if  Judas had already done so..... and no mention of a sword being drawn and ears being chopped off.  So Its either  that  Matthew's, Mark and  Luke.s that are correct and John is wrong or John is correct and the other three gospelers wrong.  So one is contradicting the other/s

Not sure  how I would describe myself . But I have read and studied the bible for over 40 years. ....... and I know you haven't.

That is why you cannot explain away those contradictory verses (of which there are many) . 

Would you like to explain away  these contradictory verses for us as you often claim to be able to do?

Are these biblical comments true or false?

Jesus either identified himself the night of his arrest or Judas identified Jesus with a kiss. Which is it?

The women spread the word of the empty tomb or they didn't. Which is it?

I would definitely believe in God if I saw him immediately cease the blowing of the wind, trouble is, for such a large claim as that, I feel like more than one account is needed. In many cases, however, the Bible just states crazy things that don't make any sense, and don't have historical evidence.

Was becoming a trans a way to escape being tiny?

Maybe.

Oh, I understand what you are saying now. I thought you were referring outside of the Gospel. I apologize for the misunderstanding. The term "Christian" does not appear in any of the Gospels. The Gospels primarily recount His teachings and actions, which occurred before the term "Christian" was coined. Since the term "Christian" refers to followers of Christ and emerged after His death and resurrection, it wouldn't have been relevant during His lifetime or in the narrative of the Gospels. The term "Christian" first appears in Acts 11:26 to describe Jesus' followers in Antioch. This makes sense because Acts documents the growth of the early Church after Jesus' ascension.

Future generations are indeed lucky. I wish I was born 200 years later. But then again, I might be immortal given how I am different from all other people and I seem to have not aged at all for past 10 years. So I might still get to see all the wonders future holds.

In first-world societies, the gradual decline of religion as a cultural cornerstone with objective, constant values has left a void that individuals and communities instinctively seek to fill. People seek to fill this void due to the inherited biological herd instincts. Religion provides not only a sense of meaning and purpose but also a framework for gratitude, humility, and civic moral responsibility (basic herd maintenance.) As these traditional systems of belief have all but faded, particularly in secular, affluent societies like the USA, the cheap replacement is vapid virtue signaling as a new form of "moral expression." It prioritizes external validation, with individuals projecting their alignment to manufactured social causes or ideals only to gain approval. This fundamental shift in the basis of "morality" is the reason for the weak moral fiber of society. One way this is manifested is how easily people will become both "pro war" and "Anti war" at the whim of a few memes within the same year. A person grounded in a firmer base of morality would have strong convictions that wouldn't flip flop so much.

In all these cases, most of them which actually exist, over-promising success while ignoring necessary prerequisites undermines credibility and exposes the institutions as exploitative. 

If it isn't extremely hazardous where you drop dead in 60 seconds and it makes money, there's no restriction.

Even if they kill bad people? It sounds like you like bad people and would be opposed to ending evil.

People would respond, "Then how come Trump can be a convicted felon while people get mad at Obama for wearing a tan suit?"

It's not white privilege; it's republican privilege.  Herschel Walker can be a hypocrite on multiple fronts; the American public on average will be more likely to defend it passionately than if Tim Waltz was hypocritical in the same way.

White privilege doesn't exist; republican privilege does.

I didn’t mean this to be a trick question or anything profound. It’s exactly what it sounds like: if Christianity were true, would you convert to Christianity? It’s a straightforward question. When I say “Christianity were proven true,” I’m essentially asking that if all the claims in the Bible (let’s just consider the NRSV version), regardless of their interpretation, allegory, metaphor, or historical nature, were accurate, would you accept them and embrace the faith (at which point you wouldn’t be able to call it faith anymore)?

You’d be surprised at the number of people who would still reject Christianity, often expressing sentiments like, “I wouldn’t follow a God who is so cruel to commit mass genocide.” I believe this question can gauge someone’s level of open-mindedness or willingness to explore new ideas. People generally prefer routines and are resistant to significant changes (with exceptions, of course). If they’re content with their lives, I think they’d be less likely to embrace an entirely new set of beliefs.

I don’t go to strip clubs. When you said you were tiny all interest faded.

A.I. rugburns

Trump calls for enemy drones on the east coast to be shot down. This guy has the highest level security clearance and doesn't know what the fuck is going on with the drones. It is definitely a threat. Maybe alien but probably human in origin. 

Either way let's shoot them down and if it's war with aliens or Iran I don't care. Let's gooooooo

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5039992-trump-drones-shot-down/amp/

Your parents are retarded because smoking is an outdoor activity. It forces you outside, to appreciate life, get you social, the satisfaction of lighting a lighter and getting that first hit of nicotine in. Anything else is a bad crutch.

So yeah, I turned gay and trans because, guess what, no one cares about straight people. They are boring.

So being born with a tiny, has caused you despair and misery?

I already created list of my disorders in the other topic. One disorder brings some misery. Plenty of disorders bring plenty of misery.

When Shila was at our strip club she said she would eat anything.

They can still blame you for all their problems.

In their words, they were good parents. I can only think that they are either too retarded or just too blatant liars to say something like that, but given their history of lies, its probably just that they are liars or maybe both retarded and liars.

So yours is a comedy of despair and misery.

Yes.

You wanted to be persecuted that’s what made you gay.

Society only cares about you when you turn bad.

Now you added personality disorder to your list of disorders. You did this to entertain.

The greatest comedy is usually born from misery.

Hope is born of despair

Why is North Korea a heaven in comparison? Parents don’t smoke or can’t afford to smoke?

Maybe that, but it’s also less of a disappointment. They can blame all their behavior on indoctrination. My parents, on the other hand, had all education and free flow of information, yet chose to not care at all.

Your avatar reflects your changing personality.

I have 100 personalities. It’s kinda disorder, but I think of it more like entertainment.

Jesus said he was sent to heal the sick. So you admit you are one sick trans.

I am a lot of things, but sure

So your parents follow North Korean rules

Even North Korea is a heaven in comparison, probably.

At least North Koreans have the excuse of literally being brainwashed and lacking information.

However, anyone who has information and still makes the worst actions possible is simply saying "I dont care about you. You mean nothing to me.".

Will society’s persecution of gays help change your mind?

The society which persecuted gays is the one that made me gay.

I mean a large range of sizes. The women can pick the size they like the best.

This isnt my opinion. I am just defending Jesus. Jesus helped me

I wasnt born gay. Its the society which made me 40% gay.

First they mocked me for being gay when I wasnt. Other people labeled me gay even when I was straight, but over time the label of gay slowly started turning me gay because I kept wondering if I was gay or not to the point where I imagined gay stuff and it made me partially gay.