I’m not sure if you’re trolling or not, but I’ll take you at face value for now.
“Everything is spacetime geometry” is just a statement. In physics, if you mean that literally, you’d need to show how it’s actually modeled. For example, General Relativity treats gravity as geometric, but it comes with clear equations and testable predictions.
A few quick issues:
“anarchy = 0” isn’t an actual equation unless you define the variables
Saying something is observable and unfalsifiable is an oxymoron, and contradicts how science works.
If everything is geometry, you still need to show how that replaces things like fields in the Standard Model
If you’ve actually written papers on this, just link one or drop the core equation here. If it’s a real framework, it should be easy to state at least one equation and one prediction.
This debate topic seems like pro just wanted a way to express their bigotry and sloppy categorization skills with the deniability of calling it a "debate topic"...which this poorly worded and framed topic is clearly not. Is that true?
Its easy for you to move on because you seemingly aren't taking any of this seriously/honestly. At best youre a rage baiter, at worst you are actually as biased and dishonest as you seem.
I read them. Looks like something produced in an episode of dunning -krugeresque AI psychosis lol.
You can have the debate, done wasting my time on dishonest and sloppy/rude actors. Definitely a waste of my time.
Girrafficus...sorry man I dont know if this will be a super fun one. It went better in my head...but whatever lets try to have fun lol
Sorry, I forgot to read your description again. I see youre not trolling.
I’m not sure if you’re trolling or not, but I’ll take you at face value for now.
“Everything is spacetime geometry” is just a statement. In physics, if you mean that literally, you’d need to show how it’s actually modeled. For example, General Relativity treats gravity as geometric, but it comes with clear equations and testable predictions.
A few quick issues:
“anarchy = 0” isn’t an actual equation unless you define the variables
Saying something is observable and unfalsifiable is an oxymoron, and contradicts how science works.
If everything is geometry, you still need to show how that replaces things like fields in the Standard Model
If you’ve actually written papers on this, just link one or drop the core equation here. If it’s a real framework, it should be easy to state at least one equation and one prediction.
Hey brother,
I was actually looking forward to this topic, dont let it flag!
Looking forward to the debate partner!
This debate topic seems like pro just wanted a way to express their bigotry and sloppy categorization skills with the deniability of calling it a "debate topic"...which this poorly worded and framed topic is clearly not. Is that true?
You're able to move on easily because you dont take any of this seriously. At best its rage baiting, at worst its intellectual dishonesty.
Its easy for you to move on because you seemingly aren't taking any of this seriously/honestly. At best youre a rage baiter, at worst you are actually as biased and dishonest as you seem.
Sorry, missed the round. New to.the site and lost track of time. Ill get tbe next one, and answer both.