Total posts: 1,013
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Are you retarded? Let's say your vote on me works. You will still get lynched the next dp and I was the NK target anyway so you gain nothing moron
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@skittlez09
Why didnt you just read the dp and be an active participant? The answer to that is probably why I am an asshole
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
Then you will be playing against your win condition and can be mod killed. I prevented your lynch re re. Just stop being a brainlet and vote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@skittlez09
Read the fucking DP. He gave his opinion. Jesus christ we have some crayon eaters here
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
This is why I think you are scum. I can tell from ragnars flip and my PM that town does not have justifications and that I am no exception to that rule. I hope town lynches you for thinking town does have justification.
I merely have a description of the role. Plus if this were some scum gambit it would be a dumb one because we are not at mylo
Created:
Posted in:
Pie is the only one who breathes through his nose here
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
Everyone is over thinking but you refuse to vote in an obvious vote situation? Tard
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
It is far fet hed because nobody suspected me as cop. Look at it from their mentality. "What kind of actual cop would fake claim day cop to troll people?" Please have an IQ above 75 take some nootropics or and download luminosity it might help
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
How is it confusing? I fake claimed daycop yesterday to troll and then I gave my real claim today. You guys are retarded. Oro should have been lynched 10 minutes after I claimed but you guys are honestly a bunch of retards.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
For the third time and the 2nd time this dp my character is Owen. Hesus christ
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Nope, I created enough of a cloud of suspicion, which would ensure my safety. I reccomend others start doing that as well when they have a power role
Created:
Posted in:
Assuming g warrant is town the o ly decent NK options were him and ragnar from scum POV. Active members who co tribute without an heir of suspicion
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Believe it 10. The trolling was really a ballsie soft claim and they killed ragnar because of the bullshit I did dp1, It would be easy to secure a lynch on me, and they likely assumed no cop would actually fake claim day cop and if they did it was to draw an NK
Created:
Posted in:
Well somebody just PMed me to tell me user debates like a 14 year old because he is one. My bad. I feel kinda bad, but in my defense he has made it further in school than I did so no excuses
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
Never good to hesitate often times scum have abilities that can be activated prior to lynch and waiting g to place a vote can have them choose a target to take down with them or use an ability to end the dp. Once you have solid evidence you strike
Created:
Posted in:
When you subtract blacks and retards the average IQ is like 115 maybe and now you add that most people exaggerate by 10 to 20 points and we have evidence that user is a brainlet. If your IQ is high why do you think any of your arguments in our debates are any better than what a literal 14 year old could put together
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
What evidence are you looking for? A cop got a guilty on him. You won't get lynches with more information than that for the most part. We have to make educated guesses for the most part based on feelings.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Owen and no justification just a character description
Created:
Posted in:
Sorry but I am in multiple debates with this guy and have a very low tolerance for NPCs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
You can't be neutral until you have all the facts here. Please I know you have a 2 digit IQ, but just for once imagine what a non retard would do when a cop investigates oromagi as guilty this early in the game, and then do what that non retarded person would do.
Created:
Posted in:
They must have a tole cop or something because oromagi somehow thinks I am cop though I never stated it other than my dp cop troll dp1
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
Vote oromagi. I have investigated him guilty. You are good
Created:
Posted in:
Damn it supa. Why bot have him replace somebody else. When you knew we were 100% lynching him today
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Why would my guilty results on water have anything to do with oro
Created:
Posted in:
Here is my philosophy with how to use the cop role. I go for who town has a hard on for, because I think it is easier to clear a innocent person's name than to find a guilty person. I targeted WaterPhoenix because he was today's obvious choice. I thought we might be able to avoid a mislynch. However water Phoenix is a for sure guilty and you guys can go after that1 user tomorrow. Because I am putting myself, this is the last day my role can be co sided useful for the most part. Don't waste it. Take out water phoenix
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Let it go one more dp. I got a guilty on water phoen6
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
No, I legitimately am a cop and got a guilty on water phoenix
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nemiroff
Why would you want to limit the amount of people somebody can kill. The risk is that the government will get a monopoly on fire power like what happened in nazi germany. Sometimes a bad person gains power over a nation. It just happens and no nation is immune, so you want to have the people having some control and bot monopolize all control and power with a government
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nemiroff
Slippery slope is not always a fallacy. Sometimes we do have a slippery slope. Let's check to see if there is one here. Along with banning ARs, are you willing to also implement a law along with it to create no new gun laws?
Created:
Posted in:
Post 117 is just some of the reason. Deflection and the jokin . attitude
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
No,you guys don't respect me enough to nominate me, and I seen the list of names of people nominated you guys think are better than me. So I feel really insulted everytime people are chosen each time it rolls around. Luckily whoever actually gets I usually deserves it but to see the other nominations without my name hurts.
Also I can read minds. IRL people are often surprised at my level of empathy and ability to tell what is going on with them. I probably would be dead without this level of empathy to be honest
Created:
Posted in:
What are the motives behind me admitting to lying? Anyone care to ponder that? My read on warren became a bit softer so instead of putting him at 80% scum it is closer to 60%. Cause I could have just doubled down on the lie tomorrow if I was correct or more than likely scum would think I was honest and they would waste an NK on me
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Mine is not a band wagon lol. I am referring g to your internal thoughts. Your internal thoughts probably look like this.
"Wylted admitted to lying, so a band wagon will probably form. I should jump on that before the actual wagon begins so I can claim to be first and not bandwagoning"
Created:
Posted in:
Thomas Jefferson was a classic liberal. I wish racists who are pro killing 50% of blacks through abortion before they are born would stop trying to adopt the term
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nemiroff
I HAVE HEARD LINERALS SAY COUNTLESS TIMES THAT Deregulation is stupid. How is deregulation stupid if liberals agree with the fact that there are too many or wrong regulations in some areas?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
The definition of liberal has changed deal with it. Technically I would fall under the classically liberal paradigm, any definition of the word liberal that would include me is one I refuse to accept. I have been on youtube and know you liberals disagree with the above statements. I have also read michael Moore books so I have been exposed to arguments from who the left sees as an intellectual leader
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Too lazy to remove my vote and the L2 was with my vote not officially attached but committed
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I proved Jesus rose from the dead, and I also discuss why god does not need to exist for my argument to win. Trouble Pinning down a definition for a vague term that could mean almost anything plays into my advantage. I assume I lose conduct points. You got me there
Created:
Posted in:
I just started this debate, and I think I proved God hates fags. Are there any holes in my arguments? https://www.debateart.com/debates/1975/god-hates-homosexuality
Created:
Posted in:
This nigga, has openly stated he wants to depopulate the Earth and gives to numerous pro depopulation charities. It is really no surprise he is pushing a pandemic now
Created:
Posted in:
Liberals believe the opposite of the following things and I would like just one to have the courage to defend their beliefs. I have reworded all the below so I am pro on all these issues
1. Over regulating things is possible
2. We should not have completely open borders
3. late stage abortions should be illegal unless done for medical reasons
4. All guns should not be completely banned
5. People should not be able to cut there 12 year old human child's dick off and call him a girl?
6. Bruce Jenner is biologically a male
7. It should be illegal for grown men to fuck 5 year old human children and younger,
8. The United States should not completely disband the military
9. Religions should not be outlawed.
10. There should be a presumption of innocence in rape cases
Created:
-->
@Marko
That is a voting pattern not exclusive to blacks. You might agree with me that whites are as likely as blacks to vote against their self-interests.
Yes, no shit sherlock. I don't think anybody called it exclusive to blacks.
My entire point was that, voters, when they think about something as complicated and multi-factorial as abortion, are probably thinking more about things like over-population, religion and morality, climate change, the cost of a child to the parent and society, the rights of women to decide, etc.....than race.
What you are listing can be partially credited to the fact that a lot of racism exists at an unconscious level, like the studied I cited in my last post showed. What happens is that decisions are typically made on a subconscious level and later on rationalized on the conscious level. Several studies actually show this to be true. https://www.nature.com/news/2008/080411/full/news.2008.751.html , I think it is silly to say that black people just can't be racist against blacks. You have to understand that a lot of the hate we see towards us gets internalized and typically the hateful internalization begins at an early age. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internalized_racism
Let's imagine for a second subconscious factors and internalized hate play no factor in somebody's decision making process, though I proved they do. I don't think it matters whether the harm to the black community is intentional or not. It still does the same amount of damage. I heard Anthony Robbins talk about this concept before. Here is the quote
“Do you realize how powerful your mind is?” Rohn asked Robbins.
“I think so,” he said, hesitating.
“Well, tell me something,” Rohn said. “What if you let anybody put anything you want in your coffee? What if your worst enemy put sugar in your coffee? What’s going to happen?”
“I’ll have sweet coffee,” Robbins replied.
“What if a family member, a friend or somebody by accident dropped strychnine in your coffee?” Rohn then asked
“I’m dead,” Robbins said.
So whether the harm is intentional or not it still occurs. which is the problem
That assumption is hard to claim without understanding the sum of their interests. Other interests like, a black women’s right to decide what she does with her body might run contrary to another self-interest(or may also add up to another hypothetical self-interest).
Maybe we are using the word self interest in different ways. some people are interested in killing themselves. That is something you might call a self interest, but when I say self interest, what I mean is what is best for the individual.
Let me start with pointing out how stupid it is to claim that abortion is "doing what you want with your body". Maybe I want to rape people with my body. I am a woman, so are you going to infringe on my right to do what I want with my body? WHich is to rape?
What is okay to do with your body changes when your actions directly cause harm to another person. It is wrong to genocide black babies, even if black women want to participate in genociding their own race. Just a reminder, genocide is what Hitler was made famous for.
Seriously take a look at my points closer. When I cited sources for things in my last post you kinda ignored my premises.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@rbelivb
So are you claiming that taking precautions to avoid the spread of COVID would lead to an economic depression that would cause more than 200 thousand people to starve to death?
Yes, that is the claim I am making.
You don't have the freedom put someone else at risk, or to infect someone with a disease, just the same way you shouldn't have the freedom to pollute the air or play loud music above a certain volume.
Anyone who goes out in public knows they are assuming some risk of getting sick. I think I got sick 3 times last year because of how much I deal with the public. Is your solution to keep everyone on house arrest permanently? Because the risk is not going away. Honestly if people don't want to risk sickness in public squares than they should resist being in the public square.
I want to stay on the issue of not having the freedom to risk infecting people with your germs. Is this like an absolute belief that nobody has a right to infect others with disease by accident? Would a good solution mean putting everyone in solitary confinement to make that impossible?
Or is this like a sliding scale, Like some risk is of infecting others is okay but not above a certain level? If so how do you quantify it specifically, and what is the precise amount of risk after it is able to be quantified should be allowed? More importantly though, how do you back up what level of risk is acceptable in an intelligent way? Like how would scientists know the specific level of risk that is acceptable?
However, I agree with many of your concerns about government overreach. Times of emergency are when governments are most liable to encroach upon private liberties, so it's important for people to remain vigilant especially around the issue of surveillance.
Why is putting everyone on house arrest not a violation of private liberties? To me it makes no sense. If government over reach is a concern, why are you so willing to give up your rights based on the fact the media and government are claiming some invisible enemy is coming to get you. Isn't part of living in a free society the willingness to accept the increased risk of living as free? We take the risk of more murderers going free because we want the freedom of the police not searching our house every single day to make sure fugitives have no place to hide. We accept the risk that more 9-11s will happen because we don't want the government listening to our calls or reading our emails. Freedom directly correlates to having less security.
Like a wise man once said, those who would trade any amount of freedom for any security deserve neither.
Created: