Total posts: 123
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Nature doesn't understand imbalance. Everything in nature is perfectly balanced. Nature doesn't understand pulling. This is a human concept and has nothing to do with nature. Nature only pushes. Thus, your understanding if incorrect and influenced by centuries of previous nonsense and stupidity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Picture a potters wheel with a lump of clay in the middle. If the clay is not centred the whole table will wobble. Thus, a planet with one ocean and one continent would spin out of orbit and either go into the sun or off into space. Because you don't believe in aether flow you need to create an illogical universe. Aether flow would push down on a planet that is irregular shaped and force it to be randomly uniform and balanced on all sides. Even the smallest deviation of shape can cause cataclysmic results. Note - The earth is currently well balanced which is evidence that I am right and you are wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
You are like a little useless baby that needs to be spoon fed. All the relevant information has been supplied. Now, its up to you to respond in an appropriate and civilised manner. Stomping up and down and demanding like a little child is not appropriate.
post #16 repeated because you didn't respond.
You are so busy attacking my theory that you have done nothing to justify or prove your own theory. You can't win by just disproving my theory and not bothering to supply any justifications for the holes in your own theory. Now, The Pangaea Theory is a crazy theory because it disobeys the basic laws of physics and mathematical laws of probability. Firstly, a planet with only one ocean and one continent would be unstable and would wobble all over the place. Secondly, it would be statistically impossible for a planet to have only one continent and one ocean. This is just too convenient and too simplistic to be real. Nature; the laws of physics and mathematics just wouldn't allow such an unnatural formation. Its almost like finding a planet which has a cube shape. This would be a violation of the laws of physics and mathematics. The laws of mathematics and physics demand a randomness and not an artificial like structure. Only humans are capable of creating artificial structures. Nature can't create any artificial structures by itself. This just doesn't happen. Thus, the Pangaea continent is an artificial structure that has been created in the mind of some demented scientist who was pressured into coming up with something that would support the 'old timer's thinking' of the day.
The main reason that the establishment will never accept an expanding Earth is because it leads to the inevitable conclusion of the existence of an aether. Most scientists would rather commit suicide than agree with an aether based world because it leads to a simplification of physics and they wouldn't like that.
Answer - The ocean sea floor near the coast is only 200 million years old which ties in with a large dinosaur extinction event.(end Triassic) Most sea floor is 70 million years old which ties in with a recent dinosaur extinction event.(end Cretaceous)
Humans are only new comers to Earth and only account for 3 seconds of a 12 hour clock rotation. Gravity increases have slowly caused animals to become smaller. This is proven by the recent extinction of the large Megafauna. Elephants - Mastodon and Mamoth. Rhinoceros - Elasotherium etc
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
You don't even know what time is, so therefore, you don't qualify in stating what its parameters are or are not. Hint - Time is a concept and a measurement and doesn't MOVE. You have fallen into the same English language trap as both Einstein and Hawking did.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
It appears that you are acting like a 14 year old. You have found a little mistake and are clinging on to it because its your only life line that you have in a raging storm of incorrectness and faulty thinking.
post #16 repeated because you didn't respond.
You are so busy attacking my theory that you have done nothing to justify or prove your own theory. You can't win by just disproving my theory and not bothering to supply any justifications for the holes in your own theory. Now, The Pangaea Theory is a crazy theory because it disobeys the basic laws of physics and mathematical laws of probability. Firstly, a planet with only one ocean and one continent would be unstable and would wobble all over the place. Secondly, it would be statistically impossible for a planet to have only one continent and one ocean. This is just too convenient and too simplistic to be real. Nature; the laws of physics and mathematics just wouldn't allow such an unnatural formation. Its almost like finding a planet which has a cube shape. This would be a violation of the laws of physics and mathematics. The laws of mathematics and physics demand a randomness and not an artificial like structure. Only humans are capable of creating artificial structures. Nature can't create any artificial structures by itself. This just doesn't happen. Thus, the Pangaea continent is an artificial structure that has been created in the mind of some demented scientist who was pressured into coming up with something that would support the 'old timer's thinking' of the day.
The main reason that the establishment will never accept an expanding Earth is because it leads to the inevitable conclusion of the existence of an aether. Most scientists would rather commit suicide than agree with an aether based world because it leads to a simplification of physics and they wouldn't like that.
Answer - The ocean sea floor near the coast is only 200 million years old which ties in with a large dinosaur extinction event.(end Triassic) Most sea floor is 70 million years old which ties in with a recent dinosaur extinction event.(end Cretaceous)
Humans are only new comers to Earth and only account for 3 seconds of a 12 hour clock rotation. Gravity increases have slowly caused animals to become smaller. This is proven by the recent extinction of the large Megafauna. Elephants - Mastodon and Mamoth. Rhinoceros - Elasotherium etc
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
I'll just wait till you address debate post #89. It appears that you have no answer, so you are now using diversionary tactics and trying to derail the debate as a weak attempt to stave of a big defeat and total white wash of your pathetic and weak responses. Don't listen to Goldtop. This person is the biggest debate cheat and authoritarian suck up that ever lived.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Not to mention that the rock age of the central ocean ridges is much younger than the ocean floor near the continents edge.
I don’t know what you’re trying to say here, but I think you should go back and double check it.
Sorry, I'll have to contact Encyclopedia Britannica to advise them of their mistake. lol That's where I got the information from. lol
post #16 repeated because you didn't respond.
You are so busy attacking my theory that you have done nothing to justify or prove your own theory. You can't win by just disproving my theory and not bothering to supply any justifications for the holes in your own theory. Now, The Pangaea Theory is a crazy theory because it disobeys the basic laws of physics and mathematical laws of probability. Firstly, a planet with only one ocean and one continent would be unstable and would wobble all over the place. Secondly, it would be statistically impossible for a planet to have only one continent and one ocean. This is just too convenient and too simplistic to be real. Nature; the laws of physics and mathematics just wouldn't allow such an unnatural formation. Its almost like finding a planet which has a cube shape. This would be a violation of the laws of physics and mathematics. The laws of mathematics and physics demand a randomness and not an artificial like structure. Only humans are capable of creating artificial structures. Nature can't create any artificial structures by itself. This just doesn't happen. Thus, the Pangaea continent is an artificial structure that has been created in the mind of some demented scientist who was pressured into coming up with something that would support the 'old timer's thinking' of the day.
The main reason that the establishment will never accept an expanding Earth is because it leads to the inevitable conclusion of the existence of an aether. Most scientists would rather commit suicide than agree with an aether based world because it leads to a simplification of physics and they wouldn't like that.
Answer - The ocean sea floor near the coast is only 200 million years old which ties in with a large dinosaur extinction event.(end Triassic) Most sea floor is 70 million years old which ties in with a recent dinosaur extinction event.(end Cretaceous)
Humans are only new comers to Earth and only account for 3 seconds of a 12 hour clock rotation. Gravity increases have slowly caused animals to become smaller. This is proven by the recent extinction of the large Megafauna. Elephants - Mastodon and Mamoth. Rhinoceros - Elasotherium etc
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Extract from article -https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
The failure to satisfy Koch's Postulates by producing an experimental disease in animals by the inoculation of pure culture was not in itself damning. Koch, himself, had sometimes failed in this regard.
If you can't reproduce a virus from a pure culture and then create the same results means that you have no virus in other words.
Thus, because I am experienced in lab work I can recognize the incompetencies of the lab procedures whereas you don't have a clue what you are talking about.
Extract - Those who already had a vaccine in hand were quick off the mark to promote their vaccines as sure preventives or cures for influenza. Drug manufacturers aggressively promoted their stock vaccines for colds, grippe, and flu. These vaccines were of undisclosed composition. As public anxiety and demand swelled, there were complaints of price gouging and kickbacks.13 (p. 114–6) Preexisting vaccines of undisclosed composition were also endorsed by physicians such as M.J. Exner, who actively promoted in newspaper interviews and testimonials the vaccine developed some six years earlier by his colleague, Ellis Bonime.
Reply - Profiteering from untested vaccines.
Extract - In the crisis atmosphere of the pandemic, the Pittsburgh vaccine developers isolated their strains, prepared the vaccine, tested it for toxicity in some laboratory animals and in two humans, and turned it over to the Red Cross for use in humans—all in one week.
Reply - By today's standards this would be a punishable crime with a 50 year jail sentence. Totally crazy hysteria with no possibility of producing anything of usefulness to the human body.
Don't forget that germ theory and vaccination were created by 2 people who were not biologists or doctors. Just con artists or snake oil salesmen. Thus, you can't build a solid foundation of science a on bed of quicksand.
Extract from vaccination liberation-
A report from US Secretary of War Henry L Stimson not only verified these deaths but also stated that there had been 63 deaths and 28,585 cases of hepatitis as a direct result of yellow fever vaccination during only six months of the war.
That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given to recruits.
Army records also reveal that after vaccination became compulsory in the US Army in 1911, not only did typhoid increase rapidly but all other vaccinal diseases increased at an alarming rate.
After America entered the war in 1917, the death rate from typhoid vaccination rose to the highest point in the history of the US Army.
The deaths occurred after the shots were given in sanitary American hospitals and well-supervised army camps in France, where sanitation had been practised for years.
Army records also reveal that after vaccination became compulsory in the US Army in 1911, not only did typhoid increase rapidly but all other vaccinal diseases increased at an alarming rate.
After America entered the war in 1917, the death rate from typhoid vaccination rose to the highest point in the history of the US Army.
The deaths occurred after the shots were given in sanitary American hospitals and well-supervised army camps in France, where sanitation had been practised for years.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Relativity implies that travelling faster than light would create a backwards time movement. Any movement of time is impossible. I am only trying to highlight the absurdity of time changing by exaggerating Einstein's theory to the nth degree.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
The universe is a pizza, now that makes sense! lol
Hold the cheese please. I am getting off! lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Quote - "why it killed people in North America where there wasn’t a substantial food shortage, nor why it didn’t kill people in 1916, or 1917 when there was also a pretty significant food shortage"
Either your English grammar is very bad or you just contradicted yourself.
Note - "also a pretty significant food shortage" which thus, also includes North America in the food shortage. Its called a 'subconscious mistake' because you knew you were lying and your subconscious punished you without letting you know about it. lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Where have tweedle dee and tweedle dum gone too?
Are they are licking there fingers over a small mathematical error and too scared to go back into battle?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
That's it! You nailed it. You haven't viewed anything in detail so you know absolutely nothing.
Quote - "other flu pandemics"
Reply - You keep making off-hand on-the-fly statements and never supplying any detail. Thus, you are skating on thin ice and you know that you can't dwell on any particular issue for too long or the facts will eventually emerge and pull you down into the freezing cold water (facts). Thus, the devil always lies in the detail.
Studying this article on vaccination during 1918-1919 I have concluded that most of the deaths in North America can be attributed to medical system meddling and profiteering from vaccines. The article states that vaccines were "distributed without any testing". That's enough for me to see that millions of people were poisoned by these interfering medical numbskulls.
Now, if you want to make a pile of cash out of a bunch of suckers. All you need to do is to start a panic about some Spanish Flu virus and then sell untested cheap vaccines which contain poisonous chemicals as preservatives. Now, if anybody dies as a result. No worries! The vaccine was adminstered too late and the person was going to die anyway. Right! Yeah! I'am sure there's plenty of suckers who'll believe that one. lol All the way to the bank!!!! lolololololololo
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
The fact remains that the Earth has expanded as all the evidence proves it. You are just picking on a mathematical error and ignoring all the important stuff. The geological evidence is there on the ocean floor so you can't deny it. Rocks don't lie but humans can.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Have you studied the food shortages problems caused by World War I?
Why is it that pandemics always occur when food is scarce?
(a) Viruses like skinny people best
(b) Viruses wait for famines to occur (no brains to think with unfortunately)
(c) Viruses don't cause disease. Its caused by vitamin deficiency.
Now, think carefully here. Only use the answer which is logical and plausible.
Quote - "Spanish flu spread widely and fast primarily because it was a novel strain, that humanity had no in built immunity."
Reply - Really, and in 1918 which electron microscope did they use to detect this viral strain difference?
Note - The first prototype electron microscope, capable of four-hundred-power magnification, was developed in 1931 by the physicist Ernst Ruska and the electrical engineer Max Knoll. The apparatus was the first practical demonstration of the principles of electron microscopy.
Thus, the new virus claim is just unsupported nonsense.
Created:
Posted in:
A typical explanation of viral flu vector
The importance of aerosol transmission is illustrated by an outbreak of influenza aboard a commercial airplane in the late 1970s. The plane, carrying 54 persons, was delayed on the ground for three hours, during which time the ventilation system was not functional. Most of the travelers remained on board. Within 72 hours, nearly 75% of the passengers developed influenza. The source of the infection was a single person on the airplane with influenza.
Reply - Note - The air conditioning was switched off for 3 hours. The people in the plane were breathing in noxious carbon dioxide for 3 hours and they were wondering why everybody got sick? Surely not? This is medical system cover up nonsense at its best. The airline has to find an excuse for poisoning the passengers with CO2 and has come up with the good old flu virus cover story. Thank you germ theory for covering the arse of yet another negligent company. It definitely wasn't a bad batch of contaminated food was it? What? You mean nobody bothered to test the food for bacteria build up due to power failure. Surely not!!! Thanks again Luis Pasteur you saved another executive from a long jail term. Good work. The system loves you for that. lol
I guess the 25% who didn't get sick were eating sensible foods and not drinking alcohol or eating sugar, milk and grain foods.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Then, you can supply details of this 'disease vector' nonsense to justify how viruses spread in a pandemic situation like the 1918 flu epidemic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
I can't find any logical explanations so guess they don't exist and I guess I win the debate. Thanks for participating.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
You are so busy attacking my theory that you have done nothing to justify or prove your own theory. You can't win by just disproving my theory and not bothering to supply any justifications for the holes in your own theory. Now, The Pangaea Theory is a crazy theory because it disobeys the basic laws of physics and mathematical laws of probability. Firstly, a planet with only one ocean and one continent would be unstable and would wobble all over the place. Secondly, it would be statistically impossible for a planet to have only one continent and one ocean. This is just too convenient and too simplistic to be real. Nature; the laws of physics and mathematics just wouldn't allow such an unnatural formation. Its almost like finding a planet which has a cube shape. This would be a violation of the laws of physics and mathematics. The laws of mathematics and physics demand a randomness and not an artificial like structure. Only humans are capable of creating artificial structures. Nature can't create any artificial structures by itself. This just doesn't happen. Thus, the Pangaea continent is an artificial structure that has been created in the mind of some demented scientist who was pressured into coming up with something that would support the 'old timer's thinking' of the day.
The main reason that the establishment will never accept an expanding Earth is because it leads to the inevitable conclusion of the existence of an aether. Most scientists would rather commit suicide than agree with an aether based world because it leads to a simplification of physics and they wouldn't like that.
1 kilometer = 1,000,000 mm
4 billion = 4,000,000,000
Deduct 6 zeros from both = 4,000km add in some large meteor strikes which accelerated the growth and caused the main dinosaurs extinction event. Then, you end up with current planet Earth. Still a very plausible and logical explanation.Thus, we are both wrong and the answer was in the middle.
Quote - All animals?? This is completely untrue. Humans have not decreased in size. Nor have many other species, horses and giraffes, for instance.
And look at dinosaurs, the biggest creatures too ever roam the Earth..They appeared 240 million years ago. That is only 5 percent of the Earth's lifetime, which means that the Earth did most of it's expanding before dinosaurs. This completely contradicts your statement that an expanding Earth causes a decrease in animal size
Answer - The ocean sea floor near the coast is only 200 million years old which ties in with a large dinosaur extinction event.(end Triassic) Most sea floor is 70 million years old which ties in with a recent dinosaur extinction event.(end Cretaceous)
Humans are only new comers to Earth and only account for 3 seconds of a 12 hour clock rotation. Gravity increases have slowly caused animals to become smaller. This is proven by the recent extinction of the large Megafauna. Elephants - Mastodon and Mamoth. Rhinoceros - Elasotherium etc
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Your website states that the Earth is only expanding at a rate of 0.1 mm per year which is insufficient to create an expanding Earth. This is false information. If you multiply 0.1mm x 4 billion years you get an expansion of 400,000 kms which is more than enough expansion for several Earth's. Now, we must take into account that this rate of increase would be exponential and not a constant growth rate. Thus, this adjustment would create the exact Earth size that we have today which proves that the Earth has indeed expanded.
1. Not to mention the fact that most continents do not subduct and therefore, throws a spanner into the continental drift theory.
2. Not to mention that all the Earth's animals have decreased in size due to increased gravity.
3. Not to mention that India supposedly travelled from the antarctic to Eurasia which is 4 times further than any other continents travel distance.
4. Not to mention that the rock age of the central ocean ridges is much younger than the ocean floor near the continents edge.
5. Not to mention that mountains can form due to slip back of the crust trying to fit over a larger inner Earth.
6. Not to mention that the central mountain rangers of Russian Urals and the Himalayan mountains don't fit the continental drift theory so they had to come up with an illogical excuse that India travelled 12,000 kms to crash into Eurasia. lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
No. I have done the research and I definitely know that they don't exist and that any explanation that you find will be made up illogical nonsense. Thus, if you can't supply a logic of how viruses find their host then I will win the debate by default.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
I am like you in that I can only find what I agree with.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Still waiting for you to answer questions about how viruses can find humans etc. I couldn't find the establishment answer because there isn't one to my knowledge.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Thermal expansion is expansion. The interior of the Earth is growing like a sun which emanates heat and matter plus gases. That is why you get volcanoes, fissures and glacier retreat. The video explains all but I guess you didn't see it and are just shooting your mouth off without looking as usual.
Created:
Posted in:
You still can't read - .35mm increase for 20 years. Times that by 4 billion years and it will be quite substantial numbskull.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Don't stamp and stomp little boy. Just answer the questions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Quote - Firstly, the human body produces vitamin D from sunlight. That means I’m areas where there is a lot of sun, there should be less malaria. In locations where there is less sun - there should be more. The exact opposite is true - because mosquitos that carry malaria fair better in warm climates.
Extract from previous post #65 -
It is estimated that around 1 billion people in the world may be vitamin D insufficient or deficient. Lack of sunlight (especially during winter months), vegetarian diets, a dark pigmented skin (as melanin acts as a natural sunscreen), increased pollution, and wearing long‐sleeved garments or clothes completely covering the body are the major risk factors (Williams 2008). Modern recommendations to avoid the sun to prevent skin cancers may also be contributing to a deficiency in vitamin D (Misra 2008).
Over the past 20 years, much attention has been paid to recognizing vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in children worldwide. Childhood vitamin D deficiency is very prevalent in many developing countries, even those with abundant sunlight such as Turkey (Ozgur 1996), Iran (Salimpour 1975), Saudi Arabia (Elidrissy 1984), India (Ghai 1991; Wayse 2004), China (Zhao 1991; Zhao 1992; Du 2001), Algeria (Garabedian 1991), and Nigeria (Akpede 1999; Akpede 2001). A study on the health status of children in low‐ and middle‐income countries reported that 73.1% of underprivileged children were 25D deficient (< 8 ng/mL) and 23.1% were 25D insufficient (8 to 15 ng/mL) (Manaseki‐Holland 2008). A high occurrence of insufficiency or deficiency of vitamin D in infants and children has also been reported in many other countries, including industrialized ones (Prentice 2008) like the US (Mansbach 2009), the UK (Lawson 1999), Greece (Nicolaidou 2006), Finland Lehtonen‐Veromaa 1999), Canada (Ward 2007), and New Zealand (Grant 2009).You clearly didn't read my previous post reference article.
We can see that because of medical system propaganda about sunlight causing skin cancer, people now avoid the sun and are becoming increasingly vitamin D deficient. Young children are kept indoors and wear long sleeved protective clothing. This is more misguided and foolish advice from the medical authorities. Note - If a person gets skin cancer, its because they eat a bad diet and not because they got too much sun. Dairy, grain and sugar causes blockages and vitamin depletion. To find a cancer just look for a lump of calcium. (i.e. too much dairy product).
Quote - Your claims are refuted by the evidence.
Answer - What evidence? You haven't given me any??????
Quote - 2.9/100,000 children incidence rate of rickets in canada. 0 cases of malaria in Canada by people who haven’t travelled to an area where malaria is transmitted.
If they are caused by the same deficiency, why is rickets still found all around the world while malaria is not?
Answer - Rickets is a skeletal disorder that's caused by a lack of vitamin D, calcium, or phosphate. Malaria is a parasite found mostly in tropical areas.
Your research is pitiful - https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/malaria/surveillance-malaria.html
Note - 488 cases of malaria in Canada. Thus, you are a blind fool.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
a.) Viruses are not humans - they do not think, they do not asses “gain”. Viruses don’t gain anything other than republicatedncopies of themselves
Really?
So, if viruses can't think, then, maybe you can explain how viruses can organize themselves to attack humans on mass in a pandemic situation like the 1918 flu pandemic?
You need to explain how do they know where to go to find their victims if they have no senses to detect their environment. (Illogical nonsense)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Because humans are the conspiratorial animal. Humans are generally incapable of doing anything in a straight forward and honest manner. We are the psychotic monkey.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Quote - This pattern repeats: Malaria. Malaria is caused by a parasite carried by mosquitos. We know this because it is prevented by mosquito nets. You have no evidence that shows any other correlating factor. Are only people with mosquito nets sprayed? Or have good diets? No: there is no evidence to support that. So we have evidence with another disease to show you the wrong. You may try and create a different ad hoc explanation to explain why the evidence doesn’t support your position, but again: explaining away evidence with unsupported assertions for which you have no evidence is pseudoscience.
If people eat proper diets, then, the malaria parasite won't bother you. It can only attack you if you are vitamin deficient. Especially if you are vitamin D deficient. Vitamin D or iodine is important in killing any small parasite or germ that infiltrates below the skin layer. People who get sick or die from malaria parasite are deficient in vitamin D. Thus, you don't need a mosquito net to prevent malaria. All you need is vitamin D.
Extract - As well as causing rickets, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with tuberculosis (TB) and influenza. It has also been linked with various other inflammatory and long‐term diseases, including cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction), multiple sclerosis, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 and type 2 diabetes (Wagner 2008a), and cancers such as breast, ovarian, colorectal, and prostate (Cavalier 2009).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
You need to explain the logic of a germ attacking and killing a human.
(a) What does a germ gain by killing the host?
(b) How can a germ carry on its genes if it kills the host?
Note - Parasites and germs need the host as much as the host needs the germ. Its a symbiotic relationship. Gut bacteria aid digestion. You would starve to death without gut bacteria. Yet, doctors administer antibiotics which can kill all internal gut bacteria. This tells us that doctors are ignorant of the role of germs in the gut. Thus, they can't or don't want to see that germs are good if they are in the right location. Now, if somebody eats grain, then, the walls of the intestine become permeable and allow gut bacteria to enter the blood stream. Thus, the person becomes sick.
Note - The germs entering the blood stream is a SECONDARY effect of eating the grain and is not a PRIMARY cause of the disease. This is where doctors are getting confused. They see germs in the blood and assume that the germs are causing the disease. This is a false assumption.
In the medieval period of history, towns used centrally located wells to supply a town with water. Now and then, an animal would fall into the well and the water would become foul and poisonous. People who lived closest to the well would get sick and die first. Then, gradually, people who lived further away from the well would get sick and die. Thus, the sickness would appear to be spreading person to person in concentric circles from a central location. Thus, some clever people assumed that invisible germs and or rats/fleas were responsible for this pattern based disease spreading. Thus, was born the idea of the contagious disease. But, alas, this is just stupid thinking and all they needed to do was check the bottom of the well for dead animals and to clear the animal from the well.
But, alas, germ theory is very profitable to unscrupulous people who can profit from people's gullibility and they still believe this nonsense till this very day.
Can you answer the questions and respond in a appropriate manner instead of using diversionary tactics.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
The universe doesn't do pulling. Its an illusion. The universe can only push.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
I have shown you videos of children being sprayed with DDT and Africans being tricked by salesmen that you can eat DDT for breakfast. You have not responded to this information because your weaselly nature only sees establishment nonsense. You keep dodging and weaving away from things which disprove your pathetic and weak arguments. You refuse to provide any evidence that viruses are real. You know that germs are weak little microorganisms that are incapable of harming anybody if left in their proper place. (the human gut).
The concept of germs attacking humans is ridiculous illogical nonsense.
1. Germs have no incentive or nothing to gain by attacking humans for a start.
2. It would be genetic suicide for germs to kill a host.
3. Germs are incapable of organising a large assault on mankind in a pandemic situation.
4. Most pandemics follow wars and natural disasters like volcanoes and droughts etc.
5. Starvation, pesticides, toxic chemicals, and natural disasters are what causes large scale death.
6. Eating inappropriate foods such as sugar, grain, dairy and alcohol cause individual, or small scale death and illness.
Germs are the result of a disease and are not the cause - Antoine Bechamp
Extract - Furthermore, rural agricultural households with limited resources often reuse pesticide containers.Where residues are not entirely cleaned from a container’s internal surface and family members willingest the contents later put into the containers (collected water, stored grains, etc.), the potential for alsoconsuming pesticide residues is high.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Small pox
Small pox is just a vitamin deficiency problem caused by leaky gut syndrome and a predominantly grain based diet. Grain contains very little vitamins that the human body can use and causes inflammation of the gut lining resulting in leaky gut syndrome. In early times, crop failure often occurred due to volcanic activity and reduced sunlight. Thus, people relied on stored grain for survival. Thus, a diet which consists mostly of grain will soon lead to a diabetic condition and organ failure. In early days, they didn't understand vitamin deficiency or why lumps and bruise marks would appear on their skin. When you are vitamin deficient the body can't heal itself and any small bruise will remain dark until vitamin C can be obtained. Thus, ignorance of vitamins led idiots like Jenner and Pasteur to come up with all types of nonsense theories about invisible germs being responsible. This nonsense is still carried on to this very day because germ theory makes a lot of devious and evil people rich. (or more commonly known as doctors)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
I’ve provided two of the most famous experiments that prove time dilation occurs. These were predictions based on the application of a scientific theory - a theory which allows you to mathematically calculate the exact amount that time would tick slower.
You said time doesnt change: as your nonsense “aether” assertions are now claiming that time does change: you just refuted yourself, and there’s little more I have to do.
As Einstein once said " a world without an ether is unimaginable"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
If Einstein is allowed to do thought experiments then Its OK for others as well. Have you tested it? How do you know that light speed can't be increased? Is it because somebody told you so and you believed them? lol
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
This is because all celestial bodies are spherical in shape and you can't see the hidden flow lines of magnetic force or aether flow. Aether flows into all celestial bodies in a circular pathway outside of the solid body. This positive and negative bipolar action which is even on both sides and meets in the middle where matter is condensed from the aether particles. Thus, atoms, planets, solar systems and galaxies all have a flat or disc shape. You can see this more clearly in large galaxies where aether jets shoot out at right angles to the galactic rotation. The aether jets eventually come back round in a circular motion to re-condense and become matter again when they meet in the centre disc area.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Despite receiving clear evidence of children being poisoned by government pesticide trucks in 1947, you still insist that DDT is not responsible for polio, ebola and zita 'viral' diseases. Thus, you have been brainwashed by government propaganda that vaccination prevents disease.
All you need to do to test if I am right or wrong is to go on a Paleo diet for a few weeks and you will find that you feel much better and have no nasal blockages or headaches. All disease names are just made up nonsense because there is only one disease which is vitamin deficiency disease. Even pesticide poisoning results in vitamin blockages (iodine) which prevents internal nervous system messages from being sent. Iodine deficiency is the cause of the vast majority of diseases because iodine or vitamin B is the key and most important vitamin.
HIV
The above website states that -
Someone who doesn’t have HIV
You can only get HIV from someone who is already infected with HIV.
Touching someone who has HIV
HIV can’t survive outside of the body so you won’t get HIV from touching someone, hugging them or shaking their hand.
Sweat, tears, urine or faeces of someone who has HIV
There is no HIV in an infected person’s sweat, tears, urine or faeces.
So what the hell is HIV or AIDS? Its definitely not a virus because a virus is contagious according to medical theory. Yet, doctors talk about viral loading when referring to HIV or AIDS. Thus, the medical system is completely neurotic and psychotic when dealing with this disease. The information is confused and many double standards apply. Thus, they don't understand what AIDS really is. Or do they? Well, of course, they do know, but they are in the business of making money out of fools and suckers. That's why they charge outrageous fees for doing nothing. I once went to a heart specialist who charged me $700.00 for a half hour consultation. In retrospect, I concluded that I was sucker punched by the system because I definitely knew more than the doctor about how the human body functions. Lesson - Don't be a sucker to this corrupt medical system.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Quote - Clue: If you have a perfect diet, and have touched the blood of someone with Ebola, you’re probably going to be more at risk of Ebola than If you have a terrible diet and do not
Reply - Ebloa, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Zita and polio are all pesticide poisoning issues. Nervous system breakdown is a result of fluorine, lead, mercury and chlorine based chemicals which attack the nervous system. That's how they kill insects.
Most pesticides work by affecting the nervous system of the insect. The pesticide interrupts the information being sent by neurotransmitters in the synapses. The chemical produced by the body used to send information through the synapses is called acetycholine. An enzyme called cholinesterase binds with acetycholine and allows muscles to rest.
In a body that is working normally, the acetycholine sends messages to the muscles through the synapses. Cholinesterase keeps the amount of acetycholine at an acceptable level, which controls the stimulation. When a pesticide is introduced at a lethal dosage for a particular body, the cholinesterase is affected, keeping it from binding with the acetycholine. When this happens, the muscles are over-stimulated which will lead to paralysis and death.
Quote - If biologist just so happened to discover viruses doesn’t exist, and tested your theory and managed to - say - create a method to cure aids. They’d be billionaires.
No, they would get their arse kicked and spend the rest of their lives as unemployed. Pharmaceutical companies need sick people, its what makes them rich. Thus, you don't kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Thus, they will never let go of germ theory no matter how many billions of people die because of it. Disease is completely avoidable all you need to do is avoid dairy, grain, sugar and alcohol. In pristine nature, animals never get sick. Sickness is purely a result of agricultural products which disrupt the digestive system and cause leaky gut syndrome. I never get sick because I eat a paleo diet. I don't get headaches regardless of the amount of stress or reading I do. Diseases like cancer, AIDS, arthritis, flu, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease are all just blockages, leaky gut and inflammation caused by bad diet and lack of vitamins.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
The fact is that the germ theory of disease is illogical. It doesn't follow any logical pattern and disobeys many laws of common sense and nature. There is absolutely no incentive for any biologist to disprove germ theory. Disproving germ theory of disease would only result in the scientist getting a kick in the arse by the establishment because it will result in great embarrassment and loss of money, jobs and prestige of the pharmaceutical industry. Idiots like Pasteur and Jenner were glorified as heroes because it enabled pharmaceutical companies, governments and food manufactures to get away with mass murder for hundreds of years.
Note - There is only one human disease which is vitamin deficiency disease. If you have any evidence of viruses then send the evidence to me and I will show you how the information was manufactured and made up. I have worked in a science laboratory and know all the dirty tricks.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Is the peer review system trustworthy? Answer - definitely not.
Peer Review is universally used to ensure the quality of scientific research, but the process may not be as reliable as people assume. A new study in PLoS One suggests that the recommendations reviewers may not be much more reliable than a coin toss. ... Twenty-eight percent of all reviews recommended rejection.
- Deliberate errors inserted
Thus, all your huffing and puffing about "is it peer reviewed" is meaningless nonsense. Thus, logic is the only way to resolve any issue. All evidence from other parties will be biased and corrupted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@mustardness
The main problem with the pictured object is that all life forms are basically symmetrical. The object in the picture is not symmetrical therefore, the supposed life form would be incapable of replicating. Thus, logic excludes it from being real and is therefore just a manufactured image from a demented scientist who is desperate to get a research grant. Secondly, the object is too fragile. The object looks like a ball of fairy floss and wouldn't last more than 5 seconds in the real world. In nature, when an immobile life form like a plant creates a seed, the seed will be made tough and strong to withstand a hostile environment. Thus, most seeds are built like Sherman Tanks and are almost indestructible. Thirdly, electron microscopes can only see in black and white and have no colour capability. Thus, the object in question is clearly a fraud on 3 counts.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Its been estimated that more than 50 % of validated studies are all frauds. lol
Created:
-->
@Stronn
E=MC squared.The difference is that I understand what this equation really means.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
All fundamental particles spin at the speed of light.
How have you experimentally verified this? What observations have you made that indicates this is true?
Reply - The equation E=MC squared tells us that 2 fundamental particles spinning at the speed of light are mass and energy equivalents. I call it the the logic of inevitable consequences. The observation is the energy that the sun produces which has to come from some small particle source. The sun's gravity squeezes the aether particles together giving C squared energy.
The universe is like a jigsaw puzzle which has only one correct solution. If you make one small error the whole concept falls apart. The standard or accepted model is totally wrong because it can't unify matter, gravity, space, light and energy. Whereas, my theory has no missing pieces and everything is accountable. My theory is 100% logical and doesn't rely on magical fields and action at a distance nonsense. My theory is 100% mechanical with no bullshite airy fairy magic.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Hi, I just made up this fake news medical report to annoy you further. lol
In the past 3 decades, we have been living with the hypothesis that, “HIV causes AIDS.” HIV, HumanImmunodeficiency Virus is considered as the causative agent of AIDS, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome;wherein the body's immune system gets damaged opening doors for major infections. However, the 3 Noble prizewinner prestigious scientists including Luc Montagnier (discovered HIV), Kary Mullis (invented PCR test for HIVdetection), and Wangari Maathai, (renowned African environmentalist), along with thousands of other scientists andintellects worked on the other side of the coin to prove back and again that the above said theory is amisconception. Last 35 years have provided immense literature and investigation evidences to firmly conclude thatHIV is not the real cause of AIDS. On the other hand, malnutrition and metabolic syndrome due to drug abuse havebeen pointed as the real convicts. This review article revolves around the same theory for better understanding theHIV-AIDS hypothesis to be fallacious and search for valid causes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stronn
Yeah, I do. Do you want to buy some fresh poop sandwiches? There specially made for people who take antibiotics and therefore have no internal gut flora so they starve to death. But that's OK, as long as the doctor follows standard procedures they won't get into trouble and can blame it on poor genetics or something. Its not the antibiotics that killed them though, I swear as a trained medical expert.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@mustardness
Its a pretty painting of an assumed virus. I wouldn't validate this as evidence though. Can you provide something a little more substantial?
Created: