That was your description in the debate you were talking about. Nowhere in there does it limit the normal amount of reasons you must give for a vote. The description of this debate does limit it.
Haha, I've never heard of Tacitus or Josephus until I came to DDO and now DebateArt. I watched The Case For Christ, which was really interesting in my opinion, but yeah, the thing about the time difference between the writings and his actual life is totally valid.
That scripture has to do specifically with Jews. This passage explains it better:
"Jesus is speaking to Jews whose hearts are not right with God. They are not faithful Jews and do not know the Father. Because they are not in right covenant relationship with the Father, they cannot recognize the perfect expression of the Father in the Son. Since they are not willing to do the Father’s will they cannot properly discern the truth of Christ’s words (John 7:17). Those who know the Father will recognize the truth of Christ’s words and be “drawn” to Him (6:44, 45, cf. John 3:21). They will be given to the Son and come to faith in Him as a result (6:37). To them alone has the Father granted access to the Son (6:65).
The passage has to do with the Father giving the faithful Jews to their long awaited Messiah. It has nothing to do with a pre-temporal unconditional election of certain sinners to come to faith in Christ. This is a conclusion that many have read into this passage according to a prior commitment to a theological system without any contextual warrant.
Jesus assures anyone who would come to Christ in faith that they will not be rejected. They will be accepted in the Beloved One of God (6:37)."
I would have voted. but then I saw that Con forfeited, so it's hard to do so unless I just give conduct to Pro. I was looking forward to the ending and I hope that you guys redo this. :/
Ok lol
"Vote on disses, flow, and rhyming"
That was your description in the debate you were talking about. Nowhere in there does it limit the normal amount of reasons you must give for a vote. The description of this debate does limit it.
In the description, it says I need no explanation for Argument or Grammar, and only need to cite one play for Sources and Conduct.
Lol I suppose, I'm horrible at coming up with ideas though :'(
I have no idea who Airbus is or what A380's are. I'm guessing they're shoes?
I'd simply outline how this is an exception because I asked the contender to come up with it. There's not much gold in that mine
I agree with that one, so it wouldn't work
Oh you meant three separate beings, yeah I don't support that either.
Really? I do support the Holy Trinity, just not predestination.
I'll challenge you
Uhhhhh, I'm not sure I'd even know what to begin arguing lol.
Huh? lol I'm confused
Thanks! Yours was pretty great too :D
I better not see anyone accept this. XD
Haha, I've never heard of Tacitus or Josephus until I came to DDO and now DebateArt. I watched The Case For Christ, which was really interesting in my opinion, but yeah, the thing about the time difference between the writings and his actual life is totally valid.
Please let me know if you aren't satisfied with my evaluation. I tried my best to be impartial, but you never know in religious debates.
To clarify, I don't mind if you cuss, I'm just saying I don't lol :D
Lol I won't, I don't cuss though, but otherwise get ready for the fire >:D
Why not lol
That scripture has to do specifically with Jews. This passage explains it better:
"Jesus is speaking to Jews whose hearts are not right with God. They are not faithful Jews and do not know the Father. Because they are not in right covenant relationship with the Father, they cannot recognize the perfect expression of the Father in the Son. Since they are not willing to do the Father’s will they cannot properly discern the truth of Christ’s words (John 7:17). Those who know the Father will recognize the truth of Christ’s words and be “drawn” to Him (6:44, 45, cf. John 3:21). They will be given to the Son and come to faith in Him as a result (6:37). To them alone has the Father granted access to the Son (6:65).
The passage has to do with the Father giving the faithful Jews to their long awaited Messiah. It has nothing to do with a pre-temporal unconditional election of certain sinners to come to faith in Christ. This is a conclusion that many have read into this passage according to a prior commitment to a theological system without any contextual warrant.
Jesus assures anyone who would come to Christ in faith that they will not be rejected. They will be accepted in the Beloved One of God (6:37)."
https://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com/category/john-665/
I would have voted. but then I saw that Con forfeited, so it's hard to do so unless I just give conduct to Pro. I was looking forward to the ending and I hope that you guys redo this. :/
No problem :)
Nice rebuttal :D
Nice job, guys.
I wish you hadn't forfeited.
Oh ok, thanks :D
I'm very surprised that Pro thought he should get the conduct point.
I suggest correcting your own grammar before you correct your opponent's.
I just joined yesterday, Hopefully we can be friends ;-;
I totally agreed with you, by the way, I love meat xD