Total posts: 2,186
Posted in:
-->
@SkepticalOne
We take care of our own.
Oh really! Then why are there over 80M unwanted and orphaned children the world over?
Killing Roe V Wade will only add to that number.
Yeah, we take care of our own. *FP*
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
If you believe that then you don't know what evidence means.
You're right. Having worked in federal law enforcement, county Sheriff, county DA, and obtaining two degrees in the legal/CJS fields left me ignorant on knowing what evidence means. *FP*
Banning the sale of something, and (sic) going around confiscating that something from people who already have it and bought it legally are not remotely the same thing.
All of these attempts are whittling away at our 2A rights. It's the Federal Government testing how little or how far they can go without resistance which will eventually lead into full blown confiscation through fear and force of (patently unconstitutional) laws concocted to disarm the citizenry and turn America into a socialist/communist state.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Read the bills. They’re the evidence.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ponikshiy
We have not finished tempting your children to immasculate themselves yet. Patience
Never gonna be complete in my lifetime. So I can care less what happens after 2075.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ponikshiy
Bwahaahaaahaaa!!! We have the largest armed populace that far exceeds any standing military you (or any other country for that matter) have. It’s precisely why no country has invaded the US.
Created:
Exit tax?? I what a crock of 💩!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
LBJ was also a racist.
And his war on poverty is what caused the heightened increase (over time) of out of wedlock births among black girls and women. It’s what lead to fatherless black children and an increase in intraracial violence, as well as the home to prison pipeline.
Yeah, some civil rights hero LBJ turned out to be. 🙄
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ponikshiy
Replies that come out of left field and written very poorly truly “makes me sick.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Let’s assume not about me. I don’t fit the definition by any means. I’m reactionary, not anything like IWRA. Not even close.
“A troll is Internet slang for a person who intentionally tries to instigate conflict, hostility, or arguments in an online social community.”
IWRA fits that definition to the proverbial T. He is a narcissist and clearly has anger management issues. Perfect recipe for being a clear cut observable troll.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
More hands on deck the better.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
In formal debate, you argue the best you can not because you want to convince the other side that they're wrong, but to try and convince a judge that the arguments and information you presented is more convincing than your opponents.
This, so far, is the ONLY thing you and I can agree upon.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Are you actually transgender or are RM and TWS on another bender?
What part of his profile did you fail to understand???
trans lesbian.
Female
Progressivism
And he just admitted he was trans. (see response above mine)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I mean why is Roosevelt even still here?
THANK YOU!!!
If there is any CoC violated by him, it is spamming the entirety of the site of DART with his relentless sophomorically banal personal attacks that are entirely unwanted and without any measure of defensible merit. He's just a troll getting off on disrupting anyone's and everyone's attempt at engaging in an honest debate/discussion within the forum section.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
overused like racist use (sic) to be
Are you kidding????
It still IS overused, even at DART by intellectual cowards who are inept/flaccid to engage in an honest debate on sensitive subject matter.
Created:
Posted in:
Fuck, I thought this place was bad with intellectual cowards like badger, rational_madman, iwantrooseveltagain, americandebater24, orogami, whiteflame, et al was bad....shit, the moment you say one word someone doesn't like, and they report you, BOOM! Banned for 3 days.
Is there anywhere on the internet where rationally intelligent people can debate sensitive topics without getting kicked because some pussy little scorned girl got offended?
Created:
Posted in:
Nearly 9 out of 10 of your posts is trolling via ad hominem arguments. To that end, each ad hominem laced comment you make is a violation of the CoC as it is SPAMMING the entirety of DART with not only our narcissistic ways, but your anger management issues. No one can begin a new topic for discussion without you entering into it with an ad hominem, just as you did with my gun control thread with the three recent measures Biden's cronies are putting forth. You're a "special" case, and as such, should be treated accordingly according to the CoC regarding SPAMMING the threads (and sometimes the comments of debates) with your sophomoric ad hominem attacks on everyone you disagree with or just want to piss off.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
scientific consensus
Lol!! Bunch of liberals and progressive denying the very science they obtained a degree in to uphold and further research without an agenda doing exactly the opposite. So fucking delusional.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
-->@RationalMadmanman on the internet doesn't think I'm a woman :(
You're not a woman and never will be.
Neither will Mrs. Piggy, no matter what wig she wears, what plastic surgeon she uses for breast implants, or how much lipstick she puts on or what dress she wears. Mrs. Piggy will still and always be...a pig (never a female human being).
Created:
Posted in:
First is HR 698: this is Biden’s ‘assault weapons’ ban which would effectively disarm the American people by banning the sale of AR-15s and hundreds of similar rifles.
This bill already has 205 cosponsors. 218 are needed to pass the bill in the House. And we KNOW there are RINOs who will vote for this if it gets to the floor.
If this legislation passes, we’ll never get these guns back
Second is H.R. 715; this is Biden’s attempt to criminalize the private sale of firearms in America and institute a national firearms registry, so the feds know which Americans own guns.
This bill also has 205 cosponsors. But it’s extra dangerous in that the lead sponsor is a RINO traitor (Brian Fitzpatrick, R-PA) which makes it far easier to pass the GOP controlled House.
We all know the purpose of this bill: to facilitate future gun confiscation.
Third is H.R. 2392; this is Biden’s legislation to mandate significant waiting periods before the American people can buy firearms. Criminals would ignore this, of course.
Remember 2020’s ‘mostly peaceful protests’ where we saw mobs of protestors burn, shoot, and murder their way across American cities? Imagine being unable to buy a gun during that time?
Waiting periods get innocent people killed. Period.
If one of these bills passes, it would be a disaster. If all three of these bills pass, it would mean the end of America as we know it because ‘We the People’ would be disarmed!
The Left knows this, and they are going ‘all in’ on these bills.
Created:
Posted in:
Officers sure as shit have tattoos, and you’re a “dummy” to suggest none have STDs. 😂😂😂😂
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Created:
Posted in:
I was out every Saturday banging chicks in Pensacola or Orange County.
Ah, spread/sharing your STDs…how Marine of you.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
So much in this world is being taken out of context in favor of emotively driven subjective expressions of intolerance by the left AND people of color (POC)!!
Listening to a video on YouTube while doing chores in the kitchen yesterday, a story was recounted of how a guy driving a truck for a company was fired by said company because POC snapped a single photo of his hand outside the window making what they believed to be was a white power symbol. And as anyone would guess and be correct every time, the white make driver was fired for it. Come to find out, he was actually jsut cracking his knuckles one finger at a time using the adjacent finger. He wasn’t even aware of the vehicle’s passengers next to him.
The accusation was not only fallacious but clearly malicious given that it was put forth without any context (ie, the company didn’t listen to his reason let alone accept it, taking the POC word over his, and saving face to avoid any labels and being cancelled by the woke mob).
Like the Starbucks manager, this driver should sue that company for the same reasons.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Your sophomoric psychological projection knows no bounds. 👏🏻👍🏻
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
The sad reality is that the President of the United States, Joe Biden, is a pathological liar. This is not a new personality trait for our Commander-in-Chief, but a characteristic that has been apparent throughout his 52-year political career.
I can go on and on and on…
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Yeah right. He’s been collecting government docs for forty + years and they’re strewn up and down the eastern seaboard FFS!!! 90% of them in unsecured locations with no measure of guardianship.
The pathological liar Pedo wouldn’t know how to secure anything.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
What's hilarious about this latest talking point is that bathroom doors only lock from the inside, so unless the documents were protecting their own privacy the doors were not in fact locked.Garage doors meanwhile, do actually "lock
Wrong!!! Anyone with half a brain can change the door handle on any door in the house, to include the bathroom, with a lock n key handle so the bathroom door can lock from the inside OR outside.
And garage doors can be circumvented with the right tech to mask the opener signal. It’s not hard to get into a garage. It is less secure.
Created:
They just keep regurgitating the lies from FOX News and other right wing liars. Because they don’t possess critical thinking skills.
Says the twit who calls everyone a “dummy” when they don’t agree with him. 🙄🙄
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Not a troll by any measure of the term; and badger already tried and he was outnumbered by a wide margin.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Thought you left for good?
Yet here you see……Harry Potter
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You left out badger being a whiny intellectual coward trying to get you and I banned for making threads in the forum he didn't like and was inept to debate against. And since he lost is trio of threads trying to ban users like you and I, he asked for his own ban because he wouldn't just leave gracefully on his own.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
Second his position!!!
Created:
Posted in:
That the FBI is corrupted, along with many other aspects of the federal government.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Judge Jackson said it herself in the Clinton sock drawer case, it is the POTUS’ sole discretion what is or isn’t presidential records and/or personal records. So yeah, POTUS is the final say, UNLESS Congress changes the PSA. It’s that simple.
And this presidential candidate put CNN to the test on this fact.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
Context is always necessary, especially at a debate/discussion platform website - “it tells you, the receiver, what importance to place on something, what assumptions to draw (or not) about what is being communicated, and most importantly, it puts meaning into the message.”
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
When it’s a fallacy, it’s a fallacy.
Since you admit it was in fact an after thought, then it was NOT in direct reply to what Wylted said (that you quoted) Taking a statement out of the proper context in which it was given, stating it was in (direct) reply to another, IS quoting out of context; hence the fallacy.
The rest of your drivel is just that, not worth commenting on further.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
Wylted said:
TWS follows up with:
Quoting out of context fallacy. That is not what I followed up with. That was an afterthought, hence the “And have you seen…”
Also (another afterthought), the definition of a word CAN be debated, as it would all boil down to context. Every word has a different meaning, and any given meaning is premised upon the context in which it is give.
Woman can be precisely defined that will never ever equal or be remotely compatible with trans woman. Man can be precisely defined that will never ever equal or be remotely compatible with trans man.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
By rationalizing transgender ideology, you’re simultaneously affirming your transness. Whether you directly or indirectly intended to. It goes with your territory.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
A video ≠ a linguistical definition of a term in relationship to specific context given.
Try again.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Clearly you are not seeing the current crusade against the "uppity white man"
You need to provide some context here, define what you mean by "uppity," because as it was initially given with the two examples given...and your subsequent response here, it is very unclear.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DavidAZ
Couldn't agree more.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
There was a time when "uppity blacks" (like Emmitt Till and Nat Turner) were executed for defending themselves.
Emitt Till didn't defend himself because he was both too young to grasp what was going on (other than angry white men were after him for some ungodly reason he did not know) and did nothing to cause the action of defense in the first place. He was just murdered, plain and simple.
Nat Turner, however, reaped what he sowed.
Bad examples.
Created:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
I believe it has more to do with the civility or lack thereof in the forums. Right-wingers are sometimes unfairly attacked for holding views perceived as hateful (Even friendly people like greyparrot catch scrutiny.), but TWS's fights with everyone have probably not helped his image much. So now everyone dogpiles him because hating him became the popular thing to do.
That's the point/issue SL!!!! I came here and presented well-grounded positions on the topics I brought forth and I was immediately attacked.
You attack me, I defend myself.
When I keep proving what an ass the opposition is, as you said, they dogpile.
It's not my fault, it's theirs.
Had they been mature and courteous, I would have reciprocated.
You get what you give.
I feel like a lot of this site (me included) are too quick to make judgments about who people actually are and so it's easier to dismiss their arguments rather than take them seriously and engage in an actual debate.
And therein lies the problem/rub!!!!!
This site is about debate/forum discussion, not about the people giving them, personally.
Created:
Posted in:
This case is just another bullshit politically charged race-based witch hunt to convict yet another white man for the death of a black criminal thug that NYC failed to take care of.
Perry was assisted by another black male, and another female POC stayed until police to arrive to give her statement that Perry was a hero. He was a white guy defending black & brown people on the train.
Neely threatened to kill people and jumped to protect everyone on the train.
Neely died because of his health, his mentality and his threats.
Neely's death is a tragedy, but he reaped what he sowed.
End of story.
Created:
-->
@Nyxified
Sorry you didn't like my gender vs sex debate. Should I have added more cucumbers to keep you interested?
Never said I didn't like it, you just rationalized BS to justify your transness.
I'll be reading it soon and likely voting.
Created:
-->
@Kaitlyn
See this is the opinion that is very unpopular at the moment. More than half of people on college campuses wouldn't want you speaking at all, if this was what you spoke about and had this opinion. This is basically the least popular opinions on one of the hottest topics right now.
You're right, and many are starting to fight back with their words, to include LGB people who detest the TQ+ part of it.
Created: