Total posts: 2,186
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
a high volume of hate speech targeting minorities is a drag on our site's image
Discussing fact based truths ≠ hate speech. FFS!!! You’re a bunch of easily triggered liberal snowflakes who just hate the truth of the reality of the world we live in.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
And yet the topic of this thread clearly stated Stephen Smith "explains why," and like usual, you're too lazy to watch a video in its entirety.
He is suffering from obvious mental decline, often speaks in word salad, is clearly compromised by foreign entities, and is mentally & physically unable to perform his duties. Evidence is in the fact that he cannot even go on the campaign trail, let alone debate anyone on a live stage without special cheat sheets to walk him through answers to pre-known questions (same for live press conferences). All of these factors speak to his age. He is too old to be a sitting president, and congress should have invoked the 25th amendment (forced resignation due to incapacitation as a result of mental defect) more than a year ago to oust him.
Created:
Posted in:
>@badgerYou spend all day on here making transgenderism out a mental illness and black people savages. If I tolerate that, what does it mean for those groups?You are the antagonist.To cry intolerance of intolerance is a farce.You spend all day on here making appeal to emotion, mockery, ignorance and ad hominem arguments.You are a denialist intellectual coward who hates the truth because the truth sounds like hate to you.You accuse others of intolerance while being intolerant towards them. Makes you a bloody hypocrite. Own it.
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Do shut up and fuck off the site you cretin.
Thus, proving my point/observation where you are concerned. Intellectual coward incel child throwing a temper tantrum...blocking me like a little girl.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
You spend all day on here making transgenderism out a mental illness and black people savages. If I tolerate that, what does it mean for those groups?You are the antagonist.To cry intolerance of intolerance is a farce.
You spend all day on here making appeal to emotion, mockery, ignorance and ad hominem arguments.
You are a denialist intellectual coward who hates the truth because the truth sounds like hate to you.
You accuse others of intolerance while being intolerant towards them. Makes you a bloody hypocrite. Own it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Now you're just creating a mountain out of an ant hill, reading into it with absurd fictional scenarios.
This reality of the correctional officer - inmate dynamics and interactions is beyond your comprehension. Your retorts are more emotive than rational (i.e., logical).
We're done here. Agree to disagree.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
But that does not mean they are in prison to be tortured,
Correctional personnel not respecting or demonstrating courtesy towards inmates =/= being tortured. *facepalm*
I 'agree that inmates can harm or kill guards,And that there is no reason to avoid protocol or lower one's guard.But this is not to say they cannot be treated with respect, courtesy.
They do not deserve respect, courtesy. By being there they clearly disrespected and lacked courtesy for their victims.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
All true and no one proved otherwise.
Again, you hate the truth cause the truth sounds like hate to you (and all libtard progressives)!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
-->@badgerIt's definitely me lol.You immediately resorted to trying to shame someone for being adopted and you think you're well adjusted? You sound like bad news, I wish good luck to anyone with the misfortune of having to deal with you.
And there you go...even more evidence of badger's hypocrisy: do as I say, not as I do!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
Only "hate" on DART comes from you and those like you. You hate the truth, so you accuse the truth and those posting the truth of posting hate when in fact it is to YOU whose espousing "hate" here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
He, like others here, simply hate the truth; they cannot accept the fact that there are things in the world that contradict their ignorance on certain realities in life...so while demanding tolerance from those espousing topics they hate, they are demonstrating intolerance towards them, personally, as well as the truth of the matter before them. Class hypocrisy of the double standard drama.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
-->@<<<TWS1405_2>>>Where do either of the articles, encourage 'coddling inmates?
I wasn't referring to the articles, specifically.
This is the definition of "respect" that I refer to, which is entirely incompatible with a correctional setting.
This is the definition of "courtesy" that I refer to:
- "excellence of manners or social conduct; polite behavior: Her unfailing courtesy made her easy to work with.
- a courteous, respectful, or considerate act or expression.
- indulgence, consent, or acquiescence: He is a “colonel” by courtesy rather than by right.
- favor, help, or generosity: The costumes for the play were by courtesy of the local department store."
Same for this definition, it is entirely incompatible with a correctional setting.
Correctional officers are not there to be polite, respectful, courteous, indulgent and/or generous to the inmates, they are there to display and demonstrate their position of authority. Inmates are the ones that need to show respect for that authority. The inmates are there to serve out their sentence (i.e., PUNISHMENT); it is NOT Club Med or a Spa.
Two people who have misguided judgments are mere anecdotes. They are not the rule. They are merely the exception.
Also, different correctional settings require different levels of assertiveness of one's authority. Max vs medium vs low security facilities have different social-psychological requirements. If you don't watch your six and are too gullible or affable, the inmates will harm or even kill you.
Need I go on?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Because I’ve not only studied it obtaining my criminology degree (w/prev minor in psych), but I’ve been in one, sat in the control room of one, and talked with the employees of one when I worked for a country sheriff. That’s how.
Blogs and articles chalked with anecdotes of one or two people isn’t proof/evidence of your position across the board. There will always be naive individuals working in a correctional setting thinking they vA. Make a difference if they coddled the inmates. Doesn’t work that way. In fact, it’s those naive individuals that more often than not either get themselves or others hurt/placed in dangerous situations.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
There is no such thing as respect and/or courtesy on the part of correctional staff towards inmates. 🤦♂️ But in said setting, inmates must respect the authority (not necessarily the staff) of correctional personnel. Whether or not they choose to be courteous is up to them.
Again, in a general (normal social) setting - respect is earned not given. Courtesy is a choice primarily premised on circumstances.
Created:
-->
@badger
@Sir.Lancelot
Badger is jsut too 🐓 💩 to engage any of us in a legit intelligent debate. That’s why he wants us gone.
Created:
Posted in:
BUMP
Created:
IwantRooseveltagain = libtard white guilt closet racist.
Created:
-->
@SkepticalOne
-->@IwantRooseveltagainI tend to appreciate and agree with your views, but not this one...
Well, that's just sad; but at least you can write cogent retorts/comments with your own thoughts instead of just cut-n-pasting from left wing socialist media sources with juvenile commentary.
Created:
-->
@Kaitlyn
-->@GreyparrotFanchick the laundry sniffer is basically a troll.He's quite bad at actual debate and arguments, so he links to MSNBC and other left-wing news-outlets to make his arguments for him, or he resorts to personal attacks (frequently), or he becomes a Grammar Nazi.He doesn't have substantive arguments, and when you provide serious responses, he ignores them and pivots onto something else.We see this when your posts become too much for him to handle, and that's usually when he resorts to calling you a substitute teacher etc. Very predictable and pretty worthless.
Spot on!
I noticed this about him from day one. Always snipping what he thinks is substantiative enough to begin an argument with some sophomoric title, often leaving out the source he plagiarized it from. And when he gets responses, he starts calling everyone a dummy and a trumpet MAGA loser.
If he wasn't here this place would be better without the constant trolling distraction he causes.
Created:
More objective analysis of the agenda of trans and gender ideology.
Created:
Posted in:
IwantRooseveltagain,True. It establishes you have zero legal background, either academically or professionally.You know TWS worked as a dispatcher for some county Sheriff’s office in Jerkwater, USA.So he’s practically a lawyer except he has no training or education or credentials
Never worked as a dispatcher, Mr Stolen Valor with anger management issues.
I do have the education, two degrees, and worked 3+ years for a DA's Office supporting 2 felony attorneys, 2 misdemeanor attorneys, the office manager, special projections for the DA, and the backup grand jury coordinator. I was the Jack of ALL TRADES in that office supporting many attorneys in a variety of capacities.
Created:
Posted in:
The ―originalist‖ argument is that the legislative debates and (to a lesser extent) the overall history of American citizenship and political theory show a ―clear intent‖ that birthright citizenship should extend only to children of American citizens and perhaps of lawful permanent residents, but not reach the children of foreign nationals temporarily resident in the United States, whether legally or illegally.
The historical background cited by Dean Eastman is that sketched by Professors Schuck and Smith in their work on the theory of citizenship in Anglo-American legal theory. The thesis of this work, and of subsequent work relied upon by restrictionists, is that modern, as opposed to feudal, citizenship requires consent of the citizen and a willingness to subject herself to the complete dominance of the nation. Thus, children of temporary sojourners—and, for that matter, any persons retaining citizenship in more than one country at the same time—cannot be viewed as fulfilling the conditions for citizenship under a proper modern definition.
In particular, the authors suggest that children of illegal immigrants did not at the time of Framing, do not now, and should not fall within the meaning of ―subject to the jurisdiction.‖ This is because the children carry at birth the taint of their parents‘ criminality: ―The parents of such children are, by definition, individuals whose presence within the jurisdiction of the United States is prohibited by law. They [the parents] are manifestly individuals, therefore, to whom the society has explicitly and self-consciously decided to deny membership.
Additional research papers: A Critical Guide t A Critical Guide to Using the Legislativ o Using the Legislative History Of The F y Of The Fourteenth Amendment to Determine The Amendment's Original Meaning
Created:
There will continuously be more truth disclosed as time moves on.
Again, the children are endangered by the trans agenda and gender ideology.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Can you read the topic?Show us where in the Bible does it say that sex with a child is wrong.
Yeah. I can and did. I quoted it back to you because you clearly couldn’t read it correctly and coincidentally stay on the topic. All you did was repeat what I wrote to you.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
No, it’s not. Do you not pay attention to what you wrote yourself?????
“Where in the Bible does it say that sex with a child is wrong?”
Pedo.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Please stick to the topic.
I did. I have been. You’re not.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
I thought you were leaving DART?Well, no.
You lied, then.
Plus, please stick to the topic.
I did when I said you’re back to your Pedo ways like when you first came here.
This topic is about the Bible, as already mentioned for 10 times.
No, the topic is about sex with children and you’re using the Bible to justify it, pervert.
Created:
I thought you were leaving DART?
And I see you’re back to your old Pedo ways again. 🤦♂️🙄
Created:
Posted in:
Ok, this is getting pathetic now
Yes, you are and we all know it since you prove that with each and every post.
Created:
Posted in:
Oh look. Stolen Valor is crying for more attention!!! LOL’mm
Created:
Posted in:
@IWantABrainAgain,
>@SidewalkerNever lived in a trailer park.That’s right, With his disability check he’s able to afford an apartment
Nope. 3 bedroom house on an acre of land. But I bet you enjoy your apartment in the white trailer trash ghetto.
Created:
Oh look, the anti-socially unhinged angry airline employee with Trump Derangement Syndrome is posting more lies.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Bye!
Next to go: IWantRoseveltAgain
Created:
Posted in:
"In the absence of specific criteria, assessment becomes very difficult as does comparative study of different approaches. The subtleties and necessities for diagnosis are summed up by Stoller.
- Some people requesting sex transformation are borderline or overt psychotics, and it may be hazardous to change their bodies to a radical degree.
- Some are quite depressed. Are they depressed soley because they cannot stand living the wrong sex-role or for other reasons?
- Some are primarily homosexual or fetishistic transvestites. For them, the genitals are essential to maintain this level of functioning and any surgical alteration would affect their pleasure.
- Some are homosexual and wish the operation to facilitate prostitution.
Implicit in these points is the unresolved question of the degree to which a change in bodily configuration resolves internalized psychological problems. More specifically, if a change occurs in personality functioning, is it on a conscious, preconscious, or unconscious level? To appraise this requires clinical expertise of the highest order and a good deal of time. The complexity and spectrum of human motives belies any simple answer that could be given on a few brief contacts. The predominance of males seeking this change - four or five males to one female - raises developmental questions."
Handbook of Adolesence: Psychopathology - Antisocial Development - Psychotherapy, by Carl O. Malmquist, M.D. (1985)
This is the cold hard truth that has been consistent for years, even decades up until 15 min ago. The left wants to erase these truths in favor of screwing up humanity. Complete FUBAR and SNAFU.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
@Sidewalker,
Never lived in a trailer park. Never even lived near one. Clearly you know all about it and what it is like, libtard.
Created:
You are like permanent children, barely able to take care of yourselves
Oh the irony… 😂😂😂😂😂
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@n8nrgim
this thread is comical in how stupid it is. i know that wasn't the author's intent, though.
Both Best.Korea ans IWantRosevektAgain are infamous for this.
Created:
Posted in:
IWantRodeveltAgain,
You need professional help. Please seek it before you get someone killed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Your OP/thread here clearly touched a few nerves.
Created:
Posted in:
@IWantRoseveltAgain,
You’re a fraud. You claim so much but prove absolutely nothing. You’re a troll. A clown. A mamma’s basement dwelling keyboard warrior and nothing more.
Created:
Corporations are doing what the US Government cannot do due to the 1st Amendment.
The Dems/Leftists are demanding corps push the UN's agenda to indoctrinate children into perverted sexuality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Oh look, a white supremacist calling other people stupid LOLOLOL.
Oh look, the idiot libtard just proved my point. LOL!!!
Created:
Posted in:
Respect is earned, not given.
Courtesy is just good manners. Nothing more.
Created:
NO surprise that TDS IWRA loser posts this crap.
If this clown works for American Airlines....I will never fly it. Ever. BUT...that is HIS claim with zero evidence to back it up.
Where is his employee's name, badge number, and employment history....without it, it's all fallacious claims. STOLEN VALOR, STOLEN AA EMPLOYMENT!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
I knew someone would bring up US v Womng Kim Ark. That case was decided specifically on Chinese immigration where the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 is concerned, and not immigration across the board (all nationalities).
- The fact that you don't know that Supreme Court Rulings are not applied according to nationality is all we need to establish here.
True. It establishes you have zero legal background, either academically or professionally.
Why is it when other countries have laws and regulations that are far stricter than the US no one cares, but when we want to enforce our own nation's laws and protect its sovereignty, it is always a "racist extremist" issue!?! Double standards and hypocrisy, anyone, anyone...
- Because wise men understand that such restriction undermine growth. At the heart of every empire has been massive cities that take in anybody from anywhere and use that constant stream of immigration for cheap labor and innovation- Alexandria, Rome, Constantinople, Paris, London, New York. Let other nations freak out about controlling borders- the empires that win have never given a fuck about the origins of the people feuling their success and really powerful nations are always nations that are dramtically shifting demographically. As Jefferson said, "Why would any man feel any obligation to die by disease or famine in one country, rather than go to another where he can live?” Every person has just as much “right to live on the outside of an artificial geographical line as he has to live within it.”
Where is Alexandria, Rome, Constantinople, etc. today? Gone. Why? Too much D.E.I. crap!!! When peoples from differing cultures, backgrounds, nationalities, ethnicities, and religions crowd one area without any one culture/group willing to assimilate to the dominate one...division arises just as we are witnessing present day in America. Elitists capitalize on that division and even add fuel to the flames of that division in order to stay in power with their lies, deceit and corruption.
Jefferson was wrong, because when one country has eradicated most diseases and controlled famine, inviting others in from countries that are rife with those diseases eradicated for whom would reintroduce said diseases and affect the health and safety of the nation's citizens, would be a nihilist. A beggar of their own demise.
- The hypocrisy is entirely in the Republican's court so long as they continue to resist outlawing the employment of the undocumented. Trump proudly boasts that he employs more than 300 undocumented workers which is why the workers continue to come. Criminalize the EMPLOYER of undocumented workers rather than the EMPLOYEE, slap Trump in jail for a couple of years for dodging every labor law on the books and the employment of the undocumented will stop immediately. Look at all the major job groups that employ undocumented -meat producers, farming, fishing, mining, timber they are ALL industries that are famously dominated by Republican interests. The very moment Republican voters look away from the border and realize that it is their political and industrial leaders that primarily illegally profit from undocumented workers and are desperate to maintain the status quo to pad thier pockets in spite of their constant rhetoric to the contrary, that is the moment that undocumented workers will lose any reason to come to America.
No, the hypocrisy is entirely upon the Democrats who hate American citizens wanting to work, so they make up lies like "illegals do the work American's refuse to." Total BS! Before illegals became a problem, American citizens were doing ALL the work, and when they became wealthier, they paid other Americans to do their work for them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
-->@YouFound_LxamI can't believe how creepy you are at only 16, Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't that creepy at 16.No doubt you will be on the cover of The National Enquirer some day.
Oh look, the libtard types and posts his usual immature nonsensical tripe since he is clearly not intelligent enough to engage anyone with a legit debate/discussion.
Created:
-->
@n8nrgim
As one who has studied Constitutional law, I say we stick to originalism.
The Framers were highly intelligent and used language that would stand the test of time, and easily understood in its application.
People need to realize that you simply cannot read the Constitution as if you are merely reading a book. Those men were legal scholars, linguistic scholars, and both worldly and spiritual.
The Constitution needs to be read like a legal statute, paying attention to each punctuation. A statement from the first letter to the period (.) could, and more often than not, contains multiple statements/criteria/measures within that one statement.
I have no problems reading the Constitution correctly, as do others with legal academic and/or professional experience. The layman does not and often gets it grossly wrong.
Created: