Total votes: 2
2 forfeit by people, pro was ambiguous, con's message was more sensible and straight, Pro merely had some logical fallicies to argue
For Full Forfeit, I am a little biased towards pro, but it doesn't fit right to present the title as an argument from the pro, it's not different than a forfeit. In such cases, an elaborate honest opinion of the argument be asserted, only once is enough. Till the Opponent responds, only then you will be declared the winner, definitely not in the argument but against the opponent. I strongly oppose the pro's argument, if it was for an actual argument, I can only imagine con having the upper hand in almost every argument. One side presented a hollow argument or just say posted the debate title as an argument while the other one didn't even bother, clearly a tie