Great. Now you could respond to 700 arguments one by one to explain why they are retarded. After you are done, I will send you 2300 more arguments on discord so you can prove your point.
What Does “Meta” Mean in Games? Meta (or Most Effective Tactics Available) refers to the current state of the game regarding the most effective strategies, tactics, characters, or builds. These are typically determined by the community or professional players as the best way to play the game to maximize success and win rate.
So you argue to ban everyone you think is a retard? Thats the true free speech supporter. "I think this is retarded. Ban it, ban it!". The real truth is, you guys are just tired of losing all the time in the forum. Yeah, I get it. You dislike my debating style because you cant win against it and cant ignore it either for some reason. I guess I created a debating meta here.
So its just your undefined opinion about my arguments when you didnt even read most of them? Thats kinda strange. Are you going to argue to ban all users who make arguments you find stupid? Besides, mods didnt really say what you say, and this wasnt issue on other topics, so I dont really see whats your point here.
I get it. I could be driving away users from the site by debating such a sensitive topic. Its not really about the way I debate, as it is not an issue on any other topics I debate. I have many debating strategies. Copy paste is just one which is easiest while also being impossible to win against in the forum.
"My guess is that it's banned because you can't handle debating the topic correctly."
Is this circular logic? Sure, censor everything you see as incorrect. Thats how you uphold free speech. Now, do you censor it because its incorrect, or is it incorrect because you censor it?
"The only one I could see actually banning based on subject alone is oromagi and he isn't active"
No one was banned. Just the topic was said to be a no no. Thats all. So when someone tells me that I cant debate that anymore, then I guess I can agree to not debate it anymore. But people do keep bringing it up for some reason. Not sure why. Maybe they want a safe space where they can punch but not be punched. Heh
Who are you even debating against here? Some spectre who cant even respond? Well, the spectre which you are apparently debating against made 160 arguments in debate section, 500 arguments in one forum topic, and 60 arguments in another forum topic. So thats how much? About 700 arguments? You responded to... 2 arguments?
Sadly, saying that someone's argument is retarded is just your opinion and hardly a reason for censorship. But yeah, I aint debating that topic anymore, cuz mods said its a no no topic and people got upset about it. I dont really see how someone can come to a debate site while opposing a debate on some topics. Not exactly the true debating spirit. And by the way, I was banned for similar topic for 7 days way before I even started using copy paste system. So really, cant blame it on the copy paste system. Its just people hating me for things I say. And they are going to hate me anyway, because we disagree on many more topics. Sure, I could go around being a people pleaser and just say things people want to hear, but then I wouldnt really be myself. It would be kinda nasty to pretend like that.
"Why not make actual arguments instead of random bare assertions with zero support? you chose to make bad arguments instead. You need to believe in your arguments for it to work."
You guys made it clear that such topic is a no no. So since its a no no, I am not going to debate it anymore. But to pretend they were winning something there before it got closed is very funny.
"It's not hard to defeat that sort of thing especially when your previous arguments make that logic null and void when no rebuttal is offered"
Sounds like you make some strange assumption that you guys were winning there and that you could beat it easily, but lets face it, if you guys were winning anything there, you wouldnt beg mods to lock my thread. I used less than 1% of my arguments there, yet you guys couldnt handle it. What you are saying is not true. The truth is, you guys saw that there was no way for you to win anything there, so went begging for it to stop. As if someone forces you to be in my thread lol
"The problem is that he's not really defending these positions but more like trolling people by pretending he has them."
Not sure if I am pretending, but its not really my fault that people are so afraid of debate. Like, there were 10 people debating against me in the forum and they were all losing lol
"usually even in his rebuttals he's just copying and pasting like a set of arguments that he's already written down so he doesn't really respond to arguments as much as he just gish gallops them."
So you get defeated by copy paste? Sure, I have 3000 arguments and 600.000 characters written on the topic. Yeah, I am invincible, I get it. There is no way for other people to get the last word when I have so many words ☹ 🥺😭
Yes. Plus, when I want to know something, AI gives much better replies than most humans, and much faster too. Like, average human cant answer even 1% of things AI can.
It cant ever be justified, because a condition for censorship to be justified is a constant debate about topic which it wants censored, making it impossible to censor a topic as it must debate it to justify itself, thus cannot censor it and be justified in doing that, at it negates the debate, and with it, a condition it needs to justify itself.
I dont think I am going to be forcefully banned by mods. Most people on this site are fine with me. Only some are bothered by my presence.
Yeah. Well, there are some people who want to ban me completely, but its the mods who decide who gets banned.
Right now, this is the only account. I dont use multiple accounts. My first account was Best.Korea, and after I banned it, I made this one.
Yes.
"I read the entire thread"
Great. Now you could respond to 700 arguments one by one to explain why they are retarded. After you are done, I will send you 2300 more arguments on discord so you can prove your point.
What Does “Meta” Mean in Games? Meta (or Most Effective Tactics Available) refers to the current state of the game regarding the most effective strategies, tactics, characters, or builds. These are typically determined by the community or professional players as the best way to play the game to maximize success and win rate.
So you argue to ban everyone you think is a retard? Thats the true free speech supporter. "I think this is retarded. Ban it, ban it!". The real truth is, you guys are just tired of losing all the time in the forum. Yeah, I get it. You dislike my debating style because you cant win against it and cant ignore it either for some reason. I guess I created a debating meta here.
Apex predator 🐯
So its just your undefined opinion about my arguments when you didnt even read most of them? Thats kinda strange. Are you going to argue to ban all users who make arguments you find stupid? Besides, mods didnt really say what you say, and this wasnt issue on other topics, so I dont really see whats your point here.
"It is"
No.
"Strawman, there are people who actually debate that subject without being retards"
And "retards" are? Someone you dislike?
I get it. I could be driving away users from the site by debating such a sensitive topic. Its not really about the way I debate, as it is not an issue on any other topics I debate. I have many debating strategies. Copy paste is just one which is easiest while also being impossible to win against in the forum.
"My guess is that it's banned because you can't handle debating the topic correctly."
Is this circular logic? Sure, censor everything you see as incorrect. Thats how you uphold free speech. Now, do you censor it because its incorrect, or is it incorrect because you censor it?
"The only one I could see actually banning based on subject alone is oromagi and he isn't active"
No one was banned. Just the topic was said to be a no no. Thats all. So when someone tells me that I cant debate that anymore, then I guess I can agree to not debate it anymore. But people do keep bringing it up for some reason. Not sure why. Maybe they want a safe space where they can punch but not be punched. Heh
You can assume something was disproven. Was it really disproven?
"That thread you are essentially repeating the same handful of arguments"
Does this sound like another assumption?
"Why don't you pick out your best one"
I am not allowed to debate the topic, so I wont be picking anything here. You are just debating against some ghost who cant respond anymore.
"You also seem to pepper in logical fallacies nearly every argument"
Given that you only responded to 0.1% of arguments, is this one of those "I assume, therefore I am"?
"Who told you it wasn't allowed and what were their exact words?"
You can ask the mods yourself. They will probably explain it much better than I can.
"And no terrible arguments shouldn't be allowed"
Thne you guys will have to ban plenty of users here lol
Who are you even debating against here? Some spectre who cant even respond? Well, the spectre which you are apparently debating against made 160 arguments in debate section, 500 arguments in one forum topic, and 60 arguments in another forum topic. So thats how much? About 700 arguments? You responded to... 2 arguments?
Not sure why you are debating a topic which isnt even allowed to be debated here.
Sadly, saying that someone's argument is retarded is just your opinion and hardly a reason for censorship. But yeah, I aint debating that topic anymore, cuz mods said its a no no topic and people got upset about it. I dont really see how someone can come to a debate site while opposing a debate on some topics. Not exactly the true debating spirit. And by the way, I was banned for similar topic for 7 days way before I even started using copy paste system. So really, cant blame it on the copy paste system. Its just people hating me for things I say. And they are going to hate me anyway, because we disagree on many more topics. Sure, I could go around being a people pleaser and just say things people want to hear, but then I wouldnt really be myself. It would be kinda nasty to pretend like that.
I needed to change the name of my account. But yeah, there were people saying that I should get banned for things I say.
"You are welcome to reread your arguments and see for yourself"
No more arguments from you, I guess.
"Why not make actual arguments instead of random bare assertions with zero support? you chose to make bad arguments instead. You need to believe in your arguments for it to work."
More unproved opinions from you.
" You aren't debating it though which is the issue"
That is your unproved opinion, I guess.
You guys made it clear that such topic is a no no. So since its a no no, I am not going to debate it anymore. But to pretend they were winning something there before it got closed is very funny.
You object to my way of debating, no?
"It's not hard to defeat that sort of thing especially when your previous arguments make that logic null and void when no rebuttal is offered"
Sounds like you make some strange assumption that you guys were winning there and that you could beat it easily, but lets face it, if you guys were winning anything there, you wouldnt beg mods to lock my thread. I used less than 1% of my arguments there, yet you guys couldnt handle it. What you are saying is not true. The truth is, you guys saw that there was no way for you to win anything there, so went begging for it to stop. As if someone forces you to be in my thread lol
"The problem is that he's not really defending these positions but more like trolling people by pretending he has them."
Not sure if I am pretending, but its not really my fault that people are so afraid of debate. Like, there were 10 people debating against me in the forum and they were all losing lol
"usually even in his rebuttals he's just copying and pasting like a set of arguments that he's already written down so he doesn't really respond to arguments as much as he just gish gallops them."
So you get defeated by copy paste? Sure, I have 3000 arguments and 600.000 characters written on the topic. Yeah, I am invincible, I get it. There is no way for other people to get the last word when I have so many words ☹ 🥺😭
Thanks, I sometimes get these debates right.
This is an easy vote! Meow
It is better if government just prints money. Its the most simple tax there is.
Not sure why its popular to oppress trans people. They are like 0.1% of population. They arent harming you.
Yes. Plus, when I want to know something, AI gives much better replies than most humans, and much faster too. Like, average human cant answer even 1% of things AI can.
It already surpassed most humans. 😅
I dont accept rated debates, but no one really thinks that.
Well, he was banned.
Was smoking even mentioned by anyone in debate???
It cant ever be justified, because a condition for censorship to be justified is a constant debate about topic which it wants censored, making it impossible to censor a topic as it must debate it to justify itself, thus cannot censor it and be justified in doing that, at it negates the debate, and with it, a condition it needs to justify itself.
Our battle will be legendary!
No, I need him to vote on my debates.
I just want a vote so my debate has a vote. I dont care who the vote is for ^^
Vote? One little vote? >.<
Okey, pwease one vote?
Okay, fine.
meow
Also, I use AI to create infinite number of arguments which can never be all answered,
so my debating powers are literally infinite, meow
Well, I am the Great Sun Mage!
Debate needs votes! Pwease 🥺
This was a fun one.
Dont worry. The Dark Gods accept everyone. They are not as judging as Jesus is. 🤘
Yeah, I have only 2 debates now which need votes, and after that, I can start new debates.
Fuck, its going to take 3 months to finish this debate.
I dont do voting. Voting reduces number of allies.