I guess it really doesn't have to be perfectly, the computer just needs to be able to think, and see color, and feel emotions. Without getting into the debate too much, I would say there's a difference between mimicking and replicating emotions
by "perfectly" I mean in a manner that cannot be done better
by "replicate" I mean a computer can do all things a human brain can do, which is feel, think etc...
I must object to your definition of Young Earth Creationism, since one can believe that the days in genesis were literal 24-hour days, and be an Old earth Creationist. For example, Michael Jones from inspiringphilosophy believes that the days were literal, but the earth is old.
I guess it really doesn't have to be perfectly, the computer just needs to be able to think, and see color, and feel emotions. Without getting into the debate too much, I would say there's a difference between mimicking and replicating emotions
by "perfectly" I mean in a manner that cannot be done better
by "replicate" I mean a computer can do all things a human brain can do, which is feel, think etc...
I'm cool with that
So how are these arguments against religion?
What arguments do you believe are being taught?
I must object to your definition of Young Earth Creationism, since one can believe that the days in genesis were literal 24-hour days, and be an Old earth Creationist. For example, Michael Jones from inspiringphilosophy believes that the days were literal, but the earth is old.
vote bump
thank you for the sources, I'll check them out
I knew you weren't, but you never know.
So do you discribe yourself as a flat earther ?(someone who believes that the planet, Earth, is a flat disc)
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flat-earther
Thank you for accepting the debate, I will have my first round argument in by Monday
I think that's the same thing.