Total posts: 469
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Well there are probably more, but I overestimated, like a lot.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Me, Ragnar(sort of), press f4respect, they everywhere.
Created:
Posted in:
Look I'm Canadian and I like seeing my countrymen on the site, but what makes us want to debate so much, is it the maple syrup or something.
Created:
Posted in:
agree, fashion is far less popular than history, and history is far more sophisticated
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Risky112
The site is good but it's buggy beyond belief, I'd consider making an account their, btw in my opinion the ads are fine, their non inappropriate or too big, don't get me wrong though, this site is WAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY better.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
yeah, that makes sense, but I think people are using them worse and worse, I saw an article that said the average person died with 4,500 dollars in credit card debt
Created:
Posted in:
It has been proven that having phisical money makes you spend more frugally, credit cards offer nothing in rewards for increased use, well it does offer rewards but it's very small. if you spend 100,000 dollars you'll get 1000 back, that's so small
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Also on my debate "Excluding humans, elephants are the best animal"
Ragnar says:The obvious K comes to mind of proving that elephants are better than humans.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
1 example, on BSH1 vs Virt on does god exist,
Rashmutu says this
“Since Vert makes no arguments against the K”...
Virt, debate round 2.
“1. The K
Con brings an interesting K to the argument. I contend that both the Theistic and Atheistic viewpoints make several predictions about how the world should look like. If Atheism is true, then this is what it should look like; and if Theism is true, this is what it should look like. The Atheist view point, for example, would say that evil is incompatible with Theism and the Theist would say, for example, that objective moral facts can only exist in a Theist-centered world.
The first argument I brought up, the ontological argument, is an a priori proof of God's existence while the KCA and moral argument are an a posteriori proof of God's existence.
I propose that we can know God's existence through both pure logic and through empirical evidence. ”
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I 100% agree, your wilful submission point is very accurate. That's largely why I'm scared of China's growing influence in Europe, America isn't perfect but it doesn't execute political opponents like China and they certainly don't put the religious in internment camps. However, I'm not sure if China's economic influence in Europe will translate to moral influence.
Created:
Posted in:
Blocking seems silly unless they're slandering your name or harassing you.
Created:
I haven't met a Canadian other than my dad that likes America. Both my friends and my teachers don't seem to understand my viewpoints, what do you think.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Thanks, just checked out "google scholar" and it seemed to filter out a lot of unrelated, useless, garbage you find on Google.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
So true, a debate between any 2 of those 3 would blow my mind, I've already been on the receiving end of brutal beatdown against origami (Great Debate BTW), we need more kings of debating to be pushed to their limits.
Created:
Plz help, finding data takes up about an hour for my 2000 character Debates.
Created: