"It seems that what you wanted to discuss and what you actually argued differ."
It could be, I'm still learning English, sites like this don't exist in Spanish.
"Just look at how many great Goku attacks are on your R1 and R2."
the only great attack is hakai, the power clash with bills used a very small fraction of power.
"I see talking about his big reality erasure attack, not his most powerful triple erase attacks or whatever."
that was literally the only "big attack", and as my opponent demonstrated, it is indeed a weak attack.
"I see the defense of a different type of attack (ki) but not the people's dust energy attack that you built your arguments on."
I never built my arguments on hakai, that was a secondary argument, and I said it several times.
"On sourcing, I really don't like that your opponent used tinyurl, but there ends up being sources like https://fictionhorizon.com/how-fast-is-superman/ vs https://ibb.co/Fz7Tdth where you don't I do. I understand what is supposed to be going on, and this one I specifically referred to https://ibb.co/d5n7kyY in which Gogeta SSB is just some random guy making a statement. The difference in quality here is overwhelming ."
There is a reason why my opponent never questioned my source, and that is, because I showed another source much better than my opponent's, the anime:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Dl1iqKUZfDsk&ved=2ahUKEwiuyufh0L34AhU1K0QIHZGEBnYQwqsBegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3kTJ8-gPeq4lqPzMwLGWKU
It's your vote, and you can vote for whoever you want, however I don't agree with you:
1: I never said that goku would launch his most powerful attack from the beginning, I said that any one of his weakest attacks would be enough to destroy superman.
2: You claim my source is a random guy, however my opponent quoted a youtuber, whose statements carry no more weight than my source, because my source (as well as my opponent's) is based on the manga.
3. The claim that goku's attacks would recharge superman like a super sun was completely refuted, my opponent didn't even respond to these arguments.
4. In the entire debate there was no evidence that superman's heat vision could hurt goku, in fact I gave a lot of evidence to the contrary.
"It seems that what you wanted to discuss and what you actually argued differ."
It could be, I'm still learning English, sites like this don't exist in Spanish.
"Just look at how many great Goku attacks are on your R1 and R2."
the only great attack is hakai, the power clash with bills used a very small fraction of power.
"I see talking about his big reality erasure attack, not his most powerful triple erase attacks or whatever."
that was literally the only "big attack", and as my opponent demonstrated, it is indeed a weak attack.
"I see the defense of a different type of attack (ki) but not the people's dust energy attack that you built your arguments on."
I never built my arguments on hakai, that was a secondary argument, and I said it several times.
"On sourcing, I really don't like that your opponent used tinyurl, but there ends up being sources like https://fictionhorizon.com/how-fast-is-superman/ vs https://ibb.co/Fz7Tdth where you don't I do. I understand what is supposed to be going on, and this one I specifically referred to https://ibb.co/d5n7kyY in which Gogeta SSB is just some random guy making a statement. The difference in quality here is overwhelming ."
There is a reason why my opponent never questioned my source, and that is, because I showed another source much better than my opponent's, the anime:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Dl1iqKUZfDsk&ved=2ahUKEwiuyufh0L34AhU1K0QIHZGEBnYQwqsBegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3kTJ8-gPeq4lqPzMwLGWKU
It's your vote, and you can vote for whoever you want, however I don't agree with you:
1: I never said that goku would launch his most powerful attack from the beginning, I said that any one of his weakest attacks would be enough to destroy superman.
2: You claim my source is a random guy, however my opponent quoted a youtuber, whose statements carry no more weight than my source, because my source (as well as my opponent's) is based on the manga.
3. The claim that goku's attacks would recharge superman like a super sun was completely refuted, my opponent didn't even respond to these arguments.
4. In the entire debate there was no evidence that superman's heat vision could hurt goku, in fact I gave a lot of evidence to the contrary.
Probabily