Vegasgiants

So you are proposing a revolution?

Seems a tad ambitious.   Lol

Well you get to complain.

As much good as that does.  Lol

I see.  It's a conspiracy by the elite.  The elite control the media.   

That argument works for anything. 

Like that faked moon landing.  Lol

I see.  You only support poor candidates?  Lol

If so many people think like you why don't you have more power in this democracy of ours?

I don't know who you're having sex with but that's not my life.  Lol

Slavery is freedom

Truth is fiction

You can play newspeak all day long  if you like

It must be.......a conspiracy!!!!!!!!  Lol

Why is your side so weak and powerless in the media?

That's newspeak.  1984.  War is peace.

Things don't work out.  You work them out.

Luck happens to those that put in the work 

Well you have a guess

The scientific community has a guess

I'll go with them

Yet debt is increasing and interest rates are falling and inflation is falling 

I can see no problem the debt has caused me in my lifetime 

Constitutionality is only determined by judges.  Legislatures can make any law and judges rule if it is Constitutional.   There is also the amendment process to add to the Constitution

Uh....no.  a law is presumed constitutional until it is ruled otherwise.  Before that you just have an opinion.   It's only the opinion of the judge that really matters

It's been my major point....along with the debt not being a problem for us yet

If it does bring your case before the court.

Until the law is overturned it is presumed constitutional 

And thus there is no relation between debt and inflation

That's a man baby!

So we agree inflation has been going down while debt is going up....right?

Within the framework of the constitution....and this law is unless you have a ruling against it

Cite your reference.

Inflation was at 9% last year.  It's at 3% now.

Are you kidding?

Then vote.  But if the will of the people pass laws to remove guns from dangerous people then they will remove them

Then don't quote the NIH.  

Lots of medical agencies take on official positions

ACOG has one here

Is there any agency that supports your position?

I think I will go with the preeminent agency full of 60,000 professionals on this issue

ACOG

Yes the government is allowed to take the opinion that felons, those with restrainibg orders and domestic violence cases are dangerous and can be not allowed to have weapons

Because the government is the people and we say so

There is no correlation to cpi and debt.

We have more debt than ever and inflation is receding 

OK thanks.  We're done

The debt has nothing to do with goods that are over priced

The government can take away guns from peopke deemed dangerous......and should 

In truth presidents are not all that powerful.  Congress runs the country.  You are essentially always voting for a party rather than the person

And yet....he does

Unlikely.  Some will die, generally the poorest, but the rest will live with some major problems

And we are changing it 

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more about our disclaimer.

Inclusion doesn't imply endorsement of.   The NIH does not endorse that position

Abrams was right

Dude ACOG does not review papers there.  It's not their job to ensure they are accurate

Again....the NIH did not do that study snd none of those authors work for the NIH

There is no medical agency on earth that agrees with you

ACOG can not remove it.   Please tell me you are kidding

My god this is basic stuff

And you are NOT quoting a NIH STUDY 

Just admit that

Weare not talking about cardiac activities.....the word is heartbeat and there is no heart then

Abrams was right 

If there is do much evidence why can't you find a respected medical agency that agrees with you?

ACOG does not have the authority to remove scientific studies.    Are you kidding?

The most prestigious medical organization on this subject has an official position.  60,000 members

I'll go with them

Abrams was right

I ask you

Would any medical agency establish a medical position based on a single study?

It's a simple question 

We have the most respected agency in the field against the authors of this one study

Just deny that

Abrams was right

But it's not from NIH as you said.  It's a single study representing the authors only.

ACOG is a respected medical agency that reviews all the literature.  

Never accept science based on a single source.

That's bad science

Watch out for the lizard people!!!!!!!

I see no evidence of that

Overpriced is sn opinion 

ACOG has sn official position on this.  The NIH does not

Yes.  You did not post anything done by the NIH.  They post studies in that library from people outside the NIH and they don't endorse them

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Learn more about our disclaimer.

I think I'm out.  There is no real debate happening here.  Too few and far between 

She's right....it's not a heart beat.  There is no heart then.  

Most doctors do not agree that constitutes a heart beat because no heart exists at that time

She was right

Quote them in a lie

That's an opinion blog....right?

You too buddy

But you were completely and utterly wrong

I had to educate you.  Lol