Total posts: 27
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Observe the way you replied to castin in this thread and to me.
I don't have any tolerance for things which are obviously wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Sorry it seemed as if you were describing your transphobic, 'under the skin' intentional trolling-style self.
You only think it's trolling because you're so irrational in defending trangenderism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
You're insanely arrogant, you post stupidly aggressive things, and you've got a stained history of doing so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
It can be, yes. Indeed, racism often depends on the differences between races.
So pointing out something that is factually accurate (racial differences) is akin to being "literally Hitler".
The whole site is laughing at you.
I don't think you know what slander means.
I don't think you know much at all.
You're a racist. Deal with it.
If you bothered to read the OP properly (not a bad idea to do before commenting), then you'd know this term is meaningless.
I think you have your causal factors mixed up.
Please stop thinking. We're losing braincells reading your posts.
I'm not the one who started the thread, hon. I never said races aren't different. The categorization, as vague and as it may be, is never the less rooted in differences among people, however superficial. But I didn't think this thread was about races and was about you trying to get a free pass to spout racist nonsense without being called out as a racist.My bad.
You haven't posted a shred of evidence to support your claims (unlike me). Instead, you've just called people whom disagree with you names, as if that's going to convince anyone (hint: it's not). This is a debate site where we post evidence/studies/sources to support what we say. If you can't rebut my racial claims without calling me a meaningless term (racist), then you don't belong here.
So, shove off, zealot.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
How do you deal with anomalies to an ethnicity? Are you going to 'pigeon hole' them into what the majority of their ethnicity is?
Depends on the circumstance. Obviously, a Black man with 130 I.Q., as rare as it is, is still a very smart man.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
You're not a cut above me. You're a light-year beneath me. I don't even care if more people have respect for you than for me, I care if those who respect me (which do exist on the site) do so immensely and for the right reasons.
People respect the competent. You're just rationalising your unpopularity, rather than addressing the valid reason you're unpopular.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Many do respect me and many hate my guts. Same is true for you. We are very similar in our temperament but different in our thoughts.
Most people have respect for me.
I actually have great control over my temper, whilst you sometimes do. Face it: I'm just a cut above you :)
Your post was designed to bully the OP and your insult was so stupid I couldn't help but laugh back at your laughing. Casten is free to watch this show and also have 'a life'.
Awww wittle bullie :*(
People watch these shows to escape from the reality of their boring lives. She's free to watch it, but it's indicative of her undesirable life.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
You have literally no idea what you are talking about.
Just another instance of your arrogance -- you think you know EXACTLY what I know.
No wonder no one respects you on here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@triangle.128k
What is with your obsession over racial IQ gaps?
Not an obsession, just a very important talking point, given the implications (I.Q. is an extremely strong predictor of the ability to function in a society).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Yes. Both of those terms are racist.
Lol. Being factual about provable racial differences is "racist".
A website written by an antisemitc crank hardly constitutes "a ridiculous amount of evidence."
So you're attempting to rebut my claim that racism is purely a slanderous term to discredit, and in doing so you're using a purely slanderous term to discredit.
You are a hypocrite.
That you hold some races to be inferior or less deserving of others.
Blacks have, on average, lower I.Q. than whites. Deal with it.
References to race have little to no utility.
Wrong. They can accurately predict crime and poverty. You're just an emotional zealot triggered out of your mind by the mention of race, and are evidently unable to comprehend the fact that races are different. Just a pathetic man, honestly.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ravensjt
you say that you can hate someone for their Race, but what you omit is what happens when you apply that racial hatred into actions.... that's Racism
Wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vaarka
Is it fashionable to wear an animal tail, whether it be real or fake? If so, how would it be best worn?
The only animal things you should consider wearing are animal prints or fur.
Animal tails are for people wanting to escape reality (i.e. be a brony or whatever), and perpetual infantalism isn't healthy, let alone fashionable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Race is a meaningless term. Race based on a single phoneme (melanin) is exponentially more meaningless.
Race isn't skin deep, bird brain.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
Recap for anyone else: Me and EtrnlVw are survival TV junkies and this is apparently a show about people who have to survive in complete isolation with limited survival equipment.
So instead of engaging in life by partaking in actual survival (or even just going outside), you'd rather watch other people do it, and thus miss out on life for a vicarious, diluted version of it.
Quite sad.
Created:
Posted in:
To accuse someone of racism or being a racist, is nothing but a slanderous invocation. Today,racism is demonised to the point of self-parody, but if we take a moment to analyse its usage, we can see that it means nothing.
Let's say someone says that blacks need to be put back into slavery because they're not worthy of regular jobs. Most people are going to say that's racist.
Let's say someone says that black people have lower I.Q. than white people. Again, you'll be met with the term racist.
And here you see the issue. The first claim could be (rightly) seen as racial hatred. The second claim is factual and supported by a ridiculous amount of evidence (http://humanvarieties.org...),yet the conclusion is that they are both "racist".
In order words, it's still possible to be correct *and* "racist", however the latter label will have you pigeon-holed with real racial hatred (as we saw in the former example), as if you're wrong for pointing out facts.
That leads us to ask the question: what can we infer from the labelling of "racist?" Not a whole lot, other than the fact that both claims refer to race. So merely referring to race, as if that's as bad as being Hitler, gets you called a "racist", and we know what happens when you're confirmed as such. So, there's a gigantic disconnect between the real parameters of "racism" (that it merely refers to race), and the application of it (that you're "literally Hitler"). That's because it doesn't have a concrete definition -- it merely exist to shut down reference to race.
Rather than use the slanderous and meaningless terms of "racism" or "racist", it would be better to use the term "racial hatred". That way, we could reject genuine racial hatred, and consider empirical data relating to racial differences in humans.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Buddamoose
If you mean by way of "systemic" the reasonable case could be made that welfare systems operate as a form of systemic racism, but systemic by way of codified law? Read somewhere Asians get docked 50 points on SAT scores, that might indirectly count as that.
I'm not saying that there cannot be unjust racial discrimination. I'm saying that "racism" is a nonsense term.
Doesn't mean there isnt racism still. Even if you take into account "race" biologically not being a valid taxonomical classification, people can still be "racist" in acting upon such "symbolic" classifications, and thus there necessarily can be "racism" in turn.
Wow, dude. That's a pretty radical (and incorrect) claim. We readily class other species with sub-species, but as soon as we do the same with humans and call them races, it's no longer valid.
If this were a debate, you'd get absolutely cleaned up, if you made this ridiculously retarded claim.
I might even post a thread just to debunk you.
Or it could just be someone being obtuse. Confirmation bias much? 😰
If you call me obtuse again, I'll give you another month in solitary confinement.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ravensjt
Segregation based off of racism.....
Racism is a meaningless term. I might re-post my thread debunking racism.
Racial Hatred? But you just said there was no such thing as Racism....
Racism, in effect, isn't entirely synonymous with racial hatred, hence why I claim that racism doesn't exist/it's a meaningless term.
To be clear: you can certainly hate someone for their race.
Your Ad Homs are only showing your failure in this thread Bro..... please try harder
Yet you were unable to quote these "Ad Homs". So, I guess they're not showing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ravensjt
I have a father who wasn't allowed to drink from "White Only" water fountains and wasn't allowed to go to "White Only" schools who would disagree with you
Segregation.
I also have a great great grandfather who's best friend was lynched in South Carolina who would like to have a word with you too.
Racial hatred.
Anything else, dummy?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Most likely. It's not an absolute. I'm judging by contextual cues.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
They have displayed capability of doing so in this thread alone.
*He/she
Braindead astrologists barely have enough presence to be considered singular, let alone plural.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Wow, yes. It's almost as if you rephrased what I wrote. It's a miracle what we wrote is synonymous.By 'only' do you mean he didn't type out he's against it when others do it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nd24007
I've literally been on this site 20 minutes, and yet I'm capable of using the reply button. Why aren't you? I suppose it's not surprising, given that you're into astrology.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nd24007
How so? Can u proof it?
Yes, I can "proof it" by having a brain.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ravensjt
The problem is that you dont make a moral equivalence between a group of Demonstrators who have a large number or Racists (White Supremists or Nationalists, whatever) and those who go out preaching equality for everybody.
You're demonising racial interest, but only when white people do it.
Surprise, surprise, you're a Progressive black guy.
Created: