I see now that I have been neglecting the duties of the instigator.
Burdens: BOP is on the PRO to prove that a psychological evaluation/assessment is for the greater good of public safety, and does not violate any rights. The CON must prove that it is not beneficial or violates a right.
Definitions:
Beneficial:
Producing good results or helpful effects : conferring benefits
From Merriam-Webster
Greater good:
The benefit of the public, of more people than oneself; that which is better and more correct.
From YourDictionary.com
Safety:
The condition of being safe from undergoing or causing hurt, injury, or loss
How long have you been on this site? This is my 2nd debate, and I havent even gotten aa reply on my first, so I really dont know what to do. What settings would you reccomend?
Im sorry if you think im hateful. I am a bi christian and i dont see any problems with it. I know that all religions, including atheiesm, ave problems. We are working through them. But I still belive religion has it's place.
Bro you know I misspelled that on accident. I meant love. I guess if we ban teaching opinions, we should ban teaching children about atheism, too. And change the constitution. Also, you know that christianity is still the fastest growing religion. And there were gay people as long as people. So there were gay christians, too.
yeah i made i mistake. I meant to argue that chilkdren shoulkdnt be taught it. Thats what my first sentence says in my argument. You shoulkd read it. Have you?
Christianity also promotes lo9ve. In virginia, there was a church who had a rainbow heart on their sign and said that all were welcome. Was that sadistic? Hateful? Intolerant? And whats to stop leftist teachers from teaching hate for relegion? Can parents not have opinions now? Teachers shoulod decide what people think?
Nice job promoting hating some people (christians) but giving equality for other (LGBTQ). I do remember when people threw their sons out. Teaching about it is gonna make more gays sons to get thrown out. Teaching children isnt gonna change the parents. And you said teenage sons. I want teenagers to be taught about this stuff. Not any younger. Im im for teaching evolution, not creation. Because its science. Gender ideology isnt science.
And whos to say that completely switching your gender based off what you wear and your makeup makes you a woman, but genetics and bio do not, even as men get breast implants to say they are a woman. But yes, thats more truth than cristianity. Also, i said nothing against talking about gayness. Just teaching it. But im more against the TIA+ part.
We dont teach hell in school. Also, im arguing that we should onluy teach about this in hig school. NOt that we shouldnt teach it at all. DO we teach the "real truth" of other sexual topics with 5 year olds? I hope not.
Yeah. I think there is scientifc evidence for evolution but firstly, there are many problems with it, but second, I beleive in God and think He had to have some sort of hand in creation.
I have definitely learned to choose my words more carefully lol
I see now that I have been neglecting the duties of the instigator.
Burdens: BOP is on the PRO to prove that a psychological evaluation/assessment is for the greater good of public safety, and does not violate any rights. The CON must prove that it is not beneficial or violates a right.
Definitions:
Beneficial:
Producing good results or helpful effects : conferring benefits
From Merriam-Webster
Greater good:
The benefit of the public, of more people than oneself; that which is better and more correct.
From YourDictionary.com
Safety:
The condition of being safe from undergoing or causing hurt, injury, or loss
From Merriam-Webster
How long have you been on this site? This is my 2nd debate, and I havent even gotten aa reply on my first, so I really dont know what to do. What settings would you reccomend?
Fixed.
Are you still working on you response for the lgbt debate?
A personality test, stress response test, stability test. And iq within 1 standard deviation below the average.
NASA is so far behind. Also i'm not taht strong of a christian its just fun to debate this stuff.
bro you know india just soft-landed on the south pole of the moon?
Im sorry if you think im hateful. I am a bi christian and i dont see any problems with it. I know that all religions, including atheiesm, ave problems. We are working through them. But I still belive religion has it's place.
My bad bro im bad at typing. lol bro but let me know when you can debate.
Minor Attracted Persons. M.A.D.. I thought you would know this. why does your bio say ur Christian lol
Bro im new, i didnt know.
quit one so we can debate. also i dont know how to make it rated
I was standing up for using less hurtful language. Thats not an attack.
you have to quit one. it says you have the max active debates allowed
I guess its about banning teaching christianity, then
debate about banning teaching children christianity or teaching lgbtq ins chools?
Yeah, I've seen koreas debates. But i guess you should say pro-MAD.
Bro you know I misspelled that on accident. I meant love. I guess if we ban teaching opinions, we should ban teaching children about atheism, too. And change the constitution. Also, you know that christianity is still the fastest growing religion. And there were gay people as long as people. So there were gay christians, too.
Yeah my bad. This is my first debate.
Do you wanna have an official debate?
yeah i made i mistake. I meant to argue that chilkdren shoulkdnt be taught it. Thats what my first sentence says in my argument. You shoulkd read it. Have you?
Christianity also promotes lo9ve. In virginia, there was a church who had a rainbow heart on their sign and said that all were welcome. Was that sadistic? Hateful? Intolerant? And whats to stop leftist teachers from teaching hate for relegion? Can parents not have opinions now? Teachers shoulod decide what people think?
Nice job promoting hating some people (christians) but giving equality for other (LGBTQ). I do remember when people threw their sons out. Teaching about it is gonna make more gays sons to get thrown out. Teaching children isnt gonna change the parents. And you said teenage sons. I want teenagers to be taught about this stuff. Not any younger. Im im for teaching evolution, not creation. Because its science. Gender ideology isnt science.
And whos to say that completely switching your gender based off what you wear and your makeup makes you a woman, but genetics and bio do not, even as men get breast implants to say they are a woman. But yes, thats more truth than cristianity. Also, i said nothing against talking about gayness. Just teaching it. But im more against the TIA+ part.
We dont teach hell in school. Also, im arguing that we should onluy teach about this in hig school. NOt that we shouldnt teach it at all. DO we teach the "real truth" of other sexual topics with 5 year olds? I hope not.
Yeah. I think there is scientifc evidence for evolution but firstly, there are many problems with it, but second, I beleive in God and think He had to have some sort of hand in creation.
I think that my LGB shouldn't be grouped with the TQIA+. And that it shouldn't be taught to 5 year olds. But that's just me being hateful, right?
I hope no one is gonna call me a bigot for this lol