Total posts: 4,959
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
You are a nihilist, the very idea of a claim being supported is an absurdity to you.
I have already disabused you of that falsehood but your total avoidance of truth doesn't allow you to understand.
There is nothing reasonable about what you are doing. If you ever make an appeal to reason, it is only for the sake of destruction. It is done out of convenience.
You are deathly afraid of what I say because you are deathly afraid of death.
The Ultimate Reality exists.
What you claim is an ultimate reality ie one of the Canaanite pantheon of gods most certainly doesn't exist.
Can you say there is no ultimate reality?
I can certainly say that the Canaanite god you claim is your ultimate reality doesn't exist.
Even you know how foolish it will make you look if you say this.
Foolish is the one who believes in fairy tales and Canaanite gods.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
As espoused by the westboro baptist church circa 1327ad.(i.e. genes vary among offspring; therefore producing more offspring produces more variance.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
It is written.
Godists are pathetic fools.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
That of course is just another of your unsupportable claims. Show me your Canaanite Yahweh before the Canaanites.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
When God speaks, the universe moves
But as we know from your bible your Canaanite Yahweh god has never spoken.
The Ultimate Reality is God.
The Canaanite Yahweh god didn't exist until the Canaanites invented it as a member of their pantheon of gods
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Your god by whatever other name you want to call it is the Canaanite Yahweh and didn't exist until they created it along with the rest of their pantheon.
Why did your other god the Jesus one need to save you from the Canaanite Yahweh god?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
See, the Orthodox Church understands that spiritual delusion is a thing. We call this prelest.
We call it godism and we know more than you.
As we consider the church to be a spiritual hospital, we have our method down to a science.
Just as the African witch doctors do.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Your Yahweh god is an invention of the Canaanites and your Jesus god apparently saved you from the Yahweh god. There is your belief in a nutshell.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Just imagine how hateful this world would be if much of the worlds hatred didn't fly into witchypoo's soul like dementors just so that she can spew it out on this backwater of the www
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@crossed
You don't seem to understand that Adam and your Canaanite god are both fictional characters in a book of fiction. They are as real as Harry Potter.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@crossed
Why didn't this Canaanite god not just intelligently choose to not make bad bacteria, as Stronn asked?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Fallaneze
That's defined by the word atheism, not your views.
In that case I'm not an atheist because I know gods don't exist.
Created:
Posted in:
@ET
Rubbish. Describe what your conscious soul experienced before you were born, with evidence.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@crossed
Me choosing to read any book of fiction other than the bible is most certainly an intelligent choice.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RoderickSpode
You do understand that the number of godist activists vastly outnumber the atheist activists, I don't think godists have any reason to criticise atheist activists when godist activists are so much more of a danger to humanity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
That is patently false from a factual historical view, but truth is not within your capabilities.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
This would seem to rule out Exodus.
There is an almost universal consensus among scholars that the Exodus story is best understood as myth;[36] more specifically, it is a "charter" (or foundation) myth, a story told to explain a society's origins and to provide the ideological foundation for its culture and institutions.[1] While some continue to discuss the potential historicity or plausibility of the Exodus story, the overwhelming majority have abandoned it as "a fruitless pursuit" (Dever, 2001).[37][38] There is no indication that the Israelites ever lived in Ancient Egypt, and the Sinai Peninsula shows no sign of any occupation for the entire 2nd millennium BCE (even Kadesh-Barnea, where the Israelites are said to have spent 38 years, was uninhabited prior to the establishment of the Israelite monarchy).[39] In contrast to the absence of evidence for the Egyptian captivity and wilderness wanderings, there are ample signs of Israel's evolution within Canaan from native Canaanite roots.[40][41] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Then why did you lie here?
That depends on what you- now a believer in the historic Christ
He has never claimed to believe in an historic Christ, try occasionally to approach the truth. Nobody owns a thread on a public forum, sorry to break that news to you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ronjs
It's scientifically confirmed that the Australian Aboriginal has occupied the Australian continent for 65,000yrs, you are just willfully ignorant
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
I love it because pointing out this hypocrisy has made this argument a lot less popular than it used to be. 10 years ago it seemed to be a popular argument. It is now more widely recognized as being a bad choice of argument.
And the irony of communicating that by computer over the internet is completely lost on him. lol
Created:
Posted in:
@witchypoo
trolls who insult people.
bwuahahahahaha, seriously bwuahahahahahaha, what a newt.
Created:
Posted in:
@golfer
Why was the Yahweh god so stupid as to demand an animal sacrifice every year and then change his mind and demand a human sacrifice and a divine sacrifice once in eternity?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
You keep claiming that keith accepts the historical Christ when he specifically rejects the historicity of a Christ but admits the partial historicity of a Jesus character, your insistence that keith accepts the Christ character as historical is simply dishonest.
@keith
I think he probably did say some of the things ascribed to him, but he couldn't perform miracles.I hope that clears up what I mean by 'partly historical'. Did Jesus exist? If by 'jesus' you mean a charismatic human preacher who founded a religion, then yes. If by 'Jesus' you mean the miracle working, divine virgin born son of a god then no.
Created:
Posted in:
Along with the Starship Euripides.The fossils are underground
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
You make the same claim for the bible and we know it's full of lies, your judgement of truth is completely untrustworthy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
I haven't read any of your links, I commented on someone being dumb enough to link to faux news, you haven't convinced me otherwise.
Created:
Posted in:
bahahahahahaThis is a topic for Christians to discuss.
Created:
-->
@Mopac
You just have no answers and you either don't understand that or you are a compulsive liar.
Created:
The USA lying about WMD's all over again and the gullible are falling for it again.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
Apply the same to Israel.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Someone is dumb enough to actually link to faux news? WOW only in Muuuuurika.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Define sexual immorality.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
It is the absolute truth that all gods are created by men and that most definitely includes yours.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
The Moses story is absolute fiction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
Can you describe what you consider the word "theory" means in the context of scientific language?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Athias
Let's apply a simple calculus: the first eight years of a child's life are its formative years. Let's say it's exposed to religious information once a week as is typical.
You are either ignorant or lying about exposure to religion that a child experiences in a religious household
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Why don't you go to the source, like say, a bishop and ask them?
The source would be your mythical apostles, in the fantasy world you live in they should be next door
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Yes, apostolic succession is one of the defining characteristics of the church, and there is not a single bishop who can not show you their lineage.
Except the Russian orthodox or Ethiopan or Ukrain Orthodox as you say here.
The church wasn't planted in Russia at 83 AD.
The idea that maybe a Russian bishop was ordained in Constantinople or something
Which Apostle was involved in that and when did it happened?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
You are right, you won't answer my questions because you can't, the only thing you think you know is the indoctrinated dogam you have been inculcated with and it can't answer questions, it can only pacify your fears.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
The Russian Orthodox Bishops cannot trace their ordination back to the Apostles? What about the Ukranian Orthodox Bishops or the Ethiopian Orthodox? Can you provide any evidence for them? Or is it only the Jewish Orthodox Bishops who can claim Apostolic inheritance?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Translation: you have no evidence you only have indoctrinated dogma provided by ignorant, primitive,superstitious savages.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Show me your evidence, not your unsupportable claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@GuitarSlinger
Whose definition of morality is that? lol
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
So you are lying when you claim that the Orthodox Bishops are a direct line of ordainisation from the apostles, or are the Russian Orthodox Bishops not a direct line from the apostles? Which lie are you willing to admit to?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Define sexual immorality.
Your nonsensical drivel means nothing, your god is a fantasy.
Making sex an idol before God.
What does that mean in HUMAN?
Created: