drlebronski

From what I know the word homosexuality doesn't pop up in it once though there are many stories that were taken out or edited meaning your opponent could find some story from the original bible that mentions it but I don't know even then if it condemns homosexuality.

lol, but seriously I'm not him that would be pointless.

I gave him permission to add on to my argument

Am i a joke to you? "Doc’s a bit more of a meme."

probably could of rejected his definition but i dont care anymore

"a Pro’s definition of “deeply flawed,” implies faults so serious, they no longer function as designed,"

interested?

interested?

lol i failed miserabley

Small argument due to time restraints. may have to forfeit some rounds as I will be busy ill try to make it for every argument

oh shoot faux law accepted this is going to be a challenge

this would have been an interesting debate

this debate was intense

No, she's an author. She writes about how all white people are sensitive and don't wanna talk about race. shes the dollar tree version of a real critical race theorist

meant read. your beliefs on racism seem to match up with her.

everyone's racist.
by the way do you red robin Diangelo just interested.

U gona explain the "method of madness?

Checkers is better only cause I'm too lazy to memorize all the piece's moves.

mairj23-" Even though I have access to everyone's real name" he's 13

bro his last argument is cap

i could be using so many ad hominem attacks right now but my opponent would use that to drop my arguments

It seems everytime he does a debate but gets destroyed he will come back 1 or 2 months later thinking now he can win

If the time limit wasn't a single day i could go way more in-depth

don't like the time limit for arguments though i can deal with it

LOL just realized that

lol i think i can do it

Thanks!

nevermind i just read the description this should be easy.

Thinking about accepting but right now I'm making a pre-prepared argument as I'm pretty trash at organized debates.

a study that showed being transgender didn't give them an advantage https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5357259/

Does wylted actually think gender dysphoria isnt real?

that's true ill clarify the definition

I suppose it is contradictory ill change to just inferior

I think ill keep it as this has happened to me before where someone in the comments will say remove this section and then accept and argue with what used to be in the description not accusing you just being wary.

Indeed

dude u still mad? get it over with.

Thats a good point

thanks

can you tell me how i should change the debates format so someone else doesnt

this got heated

Clarification: rationalmadman is not advocating for racism he made comments before when the debate name was different

Im not giving them a platform i would love to destroy whoever accepts.

I just want to debate a racist?

i reworded it as it might sound that IM the one advocating for racism

indeed i did

wtf did i do?
im taking con meaning i dont agree with the statement

bones, the link u sent me was just a debate on children being inferior.

rational madman
im just starting a debate about black people being inferior to white people my position is con unless there's a rule about talking about white supremacy

why

i clearly won this debate

lol