dustryder

"The Senate will vote to protect Roe V Wade." Sooo the Supreme Court serves no purpose as the Senate can just vote to override any ruling the Supreme Court makes based not on the law but feelings. I see no point in the taxpayer funding the judicial branch of govt any longer. The Senate is both the legislative and Judicial branch of govt. The Supreme court no longer has any legal standing it is just the opinions of 9 people that can be overridden at anytime by the Senate.  The legal opinion of any judge sitting on the supreme court carries no more weight than my legal opinion. The Supreme Court no longer  decides what laws are Constitutional, the Senate does. Again what purpose does the Supreme court serve if their rulings can be overridden by the Senate? I'll wait for your legal opinion,  it carries the same weight as a Supreme Court justice.

 No different than saying gay means homosexual. It doesn't, never has never will. The fact that you accept it as meaning homosexual is  meaningless. Gay does not mean homosexual. Gay means to be joyful or happy.  

Believing you are not the GENDER you were born as is a mental disorder. Its call gender dysphoria. That is the SCIENTIFIC term for it. Your attempt to try and interchange gender and psychological disorders is scientifically laughable. 

There are two genders male and female.

LOL That's a two way street buddy.

There are two genders. Science says so. 

Science saying there are multiple genders is willful scientific malpractice.

As to this faux; sorry, don't know who that is.

Clueless? I'm clueless for asking valid questions that absolutely no one has answered ever since Hilarious Balloon Girl said Trump was a threat.

So why do so many people interpret the things Biden says as mentally sharp, or is this a matter of faith?

I don't remember any Trump supporter saying he was particularly sharp or witty with his speech as most of the Trump supporters I knew personally couldn't stand the man and questioned his abilities, but absolutely supported the things he did.

Not a single one of them would say with a straight face that Trump was "mentally sharp"

You aren't. But boy do you think you are! You will presume to decide for others what's relevant, you will

describe the argument of others and pretend your description is reality, you totally act as if your perception is actual reality.

This is why Liberals want all details and context removed. Because reality shames them. So in our discussion you've regressed to no position at all except, "The crowd chanted."

You run from your hypocrasy of calling an actually violent crowd, "mostly peaceful" while calling the peaceful crowd, violent. So when I mention your hypocrasy, you squeal that I'm "veering".

You cant even say what the crowd was, only what it was "not". You can't address the lack of any arrests for attempted murder, rebellion, insurrection, or treason. You can't mention Pelosi or her role as capitol police boss, you can't mention the FBI report on the events on the date we are discussing. All of those things to you are, me "wandering off screeching."

Of course. You always think evidence showing your bias and hypocrasy is "irrelevant" to your position. I happen to disagree. It is relevant.

Spin. That is your biased interpretation. I have evidence that the crowd WAS friendly and festive, you want to focus on one tiny thing and interpret the entire crowd by it, ignoring all the other evidence.

So, if, according to you the crowd was neither rebellious or festive, what were they?

I denied that the chant made the crowd rebellious.

I did this by showing you video of the crowd being friendly and festive.

 I had supporting facts that the crowd was not an insurrection, and that no one was arrested for rebellion or insurrection.

I gave you examples of crowds (Antifa/BLM) that were actually rebellious and actually violent with their chants. 

 Your position is that the "Hang Mike Pence" means the crowd was rebellious.

That's the point. You haven't denied the chant and yet your position is that the crowd was friendly and festive. 

There is a sliding scale between "Friendly and festive" and "Violent and rebellious" which the chant demonstrates. But your description paints a pretty and utterly fake narrative which does allow for anything other than friendly and festive.

To be quite clear,  the description of "I see people solemly singing the national anthem, taking selfies with capitol officers, and having doors held open for elderly ladies." does not match up with "protesters were chanting “let’s hang with Mike Pence”. You can dismiss anything you like, but until you actually address this discrepancy instead of conjuring up an excuse, you are a dishonest partisan hack.

I don't need to address anything. I haven't made any claims, you have. And when confronted with a contradiction to that claim, you deflect. When you get called out for deflecting, you deflect again. 

To be clear, there is no implication from my end that the crowd was violent and rebellious and that is not a claim I have made. The only claim here is that people were chanting "hang mike pence". Now obviously, this is just an expression of free speech and an element of a protest. However, one is hardly "friendly and festive" if one is chanting for the lynching of someone, which is a contradiction.

Stop being a douche. I never denied the chant. What I denied was that Jan 6th was some sort of insurrection against America instigated by Trump.

Do you know why we dismiss this liberal charge? Because BLM/Antifa have been chanting, "Death to America/Kill the pigs" and burning flags for years. Yet for you, "Hang Mike Pence" is an "insurrection against America. We dismiss blatant hypocrisy.

Sure. Trump initiated the production of vaccines, and cleared away FDA red tape that would take years to approve a vaccine.

Idiot Democrats insisted that a vaccine could never be brought in time. They were wrong. Operation warp speed was all Trump.

Trump announced that we would be leaving Afghanistan. He even set the leave date. In fact, Trump vowed as a candidate to end silly wars.

The idiot move of asking the military leave before civilians and not securing military equipment was all Biden.

The vaccines was Trump. Leaving Afghanistan was Trump.

Barbed wire around the Capitol months after the inaugaration. Press conferences with no questions. A president suffering from dementia. High food and fuel prices. Dumb foreign policies. An out of control southern border. Collusion with big tech against the American people. Spending America's money on foreigners first. Political prisoners. A blindingly stupid 3 trillion dollar spending package.

No new wars started. First president to meet NK's leader and get him to stop long range missile launches. Highest employment rates for women and minorities. A secure southern border. Brokering a peace deal with Israel and 5 Arab countries. Enforcing the country's laws on immigration and religious rights. Making European nation's pay their fair share for their defense. Renegotiating better trade deals with Mexico and Canada. A sound and growing economy.

Being called a Russian Agent is astronomically worse, especially if it’s literally proven false.

And previous Presidents haven’t gotten as many votes either. You and I both know that without mail in voting, Trump would’ve easily won. 

Don’t worry tho, states are making sure this shit doesn’t happen again. It’s why Dems are panicking. Just look at Texas for example.

That doesn’t mean anything lol. Trump could say nothing and they’d still run a hit piece on him 24/7 based on so many fake news stories

You’ll note that previous Presidents all had a career in politics. There’s a reason why there are so many fake news stories. Just like bounties hoax and Russia Russia Russia

College degrees are either required or irrelevant for a job.  The jobs I'm talking about have a college degree as irrelevant.  With a mechanic for instance, a college degree is irrelevant.

There is a difference between skills and experience.  Skills can be obtained through courses the applicant would have to do that are relatively cheap to do.  Experience for a job isn't necessary, but only useful for higher salaries.  Every single mechanic was at one point, not experienced.  Yet their company accepted that and gave them the experience to do well because they knew that they could hire an inexperience mechanic for less and when that mechanic gets more experienced, he gets raises.  People with no experience are cheaper to hire.

The work they do is more productive than working at McDonalds.

How?  You just find a new place to rent.

Jobs might prefer to hire someone with a higher level degree, but given that they pay very high salaries and no college degree is required, such companies don't really care because college education isn't required.

If your referring to on the job training, you obtain that while working at the job.

In my personal experience, the majority of minimum wage workers have at least a highschool diploma. If they are perminately out of school, they can find better work. They just need to look up the jobs they can get.

I imagine the vast majority of them if not, all of them. If they have families, they just bring their families to a new place to work. They are probably renting, so they just need to find a new spot to rent (possibly).

You sure about this?  The university of Georgetown found 13 million jobs in the US that only require a HS degree to do that pay $55K/year or more.  This is roughly $27/hour.  There are only 1.6 million minimum wage workers, the majority of whom are in highschool or college.  There are enough jobs for everyone.  People in these positions just need to search for them.