you can skip my round 1 if you have the fundamental knowledge of the topic at hand. had to adjust my methodology based on Con's input or lack thereof. the logic table should be enough to show a minimum argument alongside the text of my round 4 (with the other images being supportive)
Thank you for this advice. But I won't be having any more to do with this 14yo troll. He didn't miss a round. He intentionally let it lapse. He is a troll and I advise you to stay away from him and/or block him. He will end up wasting your time and not apologising for it either
Here are some of his comment deletions:
https://i.postimg.cc/Bb034K0s/0.png
https://i.postimg.cc/02Zv1jHR/1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/wjGd3Ppw/2.png
predictable, dude, so predictable
you might as well just stay silent now
here they are again (they're the same links btw)
https://i.postimg.cc/Bb034K0s/0.png
https://i.postimg.cc/02Zv1jHR/1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/wjGd3Ppw/2.png
ok good on you.
good luck with your exams
let me know when you want to do the debate and I will recreate it
also see the screenshots for proof Lancelot was trolling the whole time
I'd not take anything he says seriously if I was you
seems like a frustrated teenager with no respect for people's time and no apologies forthcoming for those whose time he has wasted
just more jokes
he might as well go stare at a mirror
and get some inspiration
you're trolling and badly
https://i.postimg.cc/Bb034K0s/0.png
https://i.postimg.cc/02Zv1jHR/1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/wjGd3Ppw/2.png
you know, I used to have a friend just like you, when I was 15
I know all your gimmicks probably
but I'm up for surprises
such as you failing to make me yawn 10mins after I downed an espresso
weak...
^and before you try it: no, my espresso wasn't weak; you are
case in point, see lancelot's comment. not so irrational after all of me to attack a troll, p.s. all I wanted from the start was an explanation for the "boop" and he is still refusing to even comment on it i.e. he is trolling and probably giggling IRL and I won't be wasting any more time on him.
why not do the debate now? you said "your resolution is so poorly articulated it could be defeated by a few paragraphs."
wouldn't even need to do rounds 2-5...
maybe you're not so sure anymore? I get that a lot with this type of topic no matter where I go
I don't blame you really - the more you dig into this stuff the more you start doubting long-held convictions
not sure why you're defending him. he can always just jump in and say something (and not delete it immediately after so the person who gets the notification sees nothing when they go looking for it)
He just now wrote a comment reply here, which gave me a notification, then when I went to look at it there was no reply.
He didn't explain why he couldn't complete the round
He didn't apologise for not completing it
He didn't say anything but "boop" (including after I asked him what was going on)
He is playing childish games
Okay so you want to be the contender on this debate if I remake it?
Austin, could it?
Seems like it hasn't been done so far.
... are you challenging me?
Anyway, who cares about lives outside the site. I set the time limit to two weeks. Lancelot could see that before he accepted. Not my problem. You don't say yes to a job shift then call in 2 hours into it and say 'oh, sorry, I have a life going on here'
would make sense.
if he didn't wait until the last minute in the two-week argument period to write "boop"; and
if he didn't complete like five other debates in the two-week argument period; and
if he replied to me when I asked what was going on; and
if he explained what he meant by "boop" when I asked him
he's acting like a child because he disagrees with my debate premise yet can't seem to articulate that in the format of a debate.
so why would he accept the contender position?
thinks it's funny to waste people's time, or something, who knows what kids think these days
sorry Kritikal, missed one citation and reference: https://dissolve.com/video/Footage-Dachau-Nazi-Concentration-Camp-victims-gas-royalty-free-stock-video-footage/001-D378-13-973
for "This video (graphic) shows 'Footage of Dachau Nazi Concentration Camp victims ..."
Hi, sorry this is just a recreation to change the character limit, both Kritikal and I agreed to do the change and keep everything as-is, I will post my r2 within 2 days to keep with the original round time limits
Sure but a more specific debate premise and a smaller word count than what I made, please. Don't have a lot of time at the mo
thank you for the vote but BoP was shared and that is specified in the description
rematch of?
Barney,
you can skip my round 1 if you have the fundamental knowledge of the topic at hand. had to adjust my methodology based on Con's input or lack thereof. the logic table should be enough to show a minimum argument alongside the text of my round 4 (with the other images being supportive)
I split the big image into 4. let me know if you have issues with the logic table image
https://imgur.com/zo7h9cJ
https://imgur.com/9Ew8uQy
https://imgur.com/JyWyFkN
https://imgur.com/pJ5y3mx
remember BoP is shared though.
I will try uploading the pics as tiles and post the links here
can you define life
homicidal gas chambers in Third Reich camps, 21st Century terror attacks, forensic science and criminal psychology
yours?
for debates?
Thank you for this advice. But I won't be having any more to do with this 14yo troll. He didn't miss a round. He intentionally let it lapse. He is a troll and I advise you to stay away from him and/or block him. He will end up wasting your time and not apologising for it either
Here are some of his comment deletions:
https://i.postimg.cc/Bb034K0s/0.png
https://i.postimg.cc/02Zv1jHR/1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/wjGd3Ppw/2.png
you're blocked now
cos you wouldn't be silent on your own
links work fine, as you know
you're better off staying silent now
you're done
predictable, dude, so predictable
you might as well just stay silent now
here they are again (they're the same links btw)
https://i.postimg.cc/Bb034K0s/0.png
https://i.postimg.cc/02Zv1jHR/1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/wjGd3Ppw/2.png
ok good on you.
good luck with your exams
let me know when you want to do the debate and I will recreate it
also see the screenshots for proof Lancelot was trolling the whole time
I'd not take anything he says seriously if I was you
seems like a frustrated teenager with no respect for people's time and no apologies forthcoming for those whose time he has wasted
just more jokes
he might as well go stare at a mirror
and get some inspiration
you're trolling and badly
https://i.postimg.cc/Bb034K0s/0.png
https://i.postimg.cc/02Zv1jHR/1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/wjGd3Ppw/2.png
you know, I used to have a friend just like you, when I was 15
I know all your gimmicks probably
but I'm up for surprises
such as you failing to make me yawn 10mins after I downed an espresso
weak...
^and before you try it: no, my espresso wasn't weak; you are
answer my question from before: "what's going on? I said no timewasters" concerning your r1 argument
he deleted the comment btw
It read "are you trolling me?"
and I took a screen in case he tries to call me a liar
answer my question from before: "what's going on? I said no timewasters" concerning your r1 argument
answer my question from before: "what's going on? I said no timewasters" concerning your r1 argument
case in point, see lancelot's comment. not so irrational after all of me to attack a troll, p.s. all I wanted from the start was an explanation for the "boop" and he is still refusing to even comment on it i.e. he is trolling and probably giggling IRL and I won't be wasting any more time on him.
why not do the debate now? you said "your resolution is so poorly articulated it could be defeated by a few paragraphs."
wouldn't even need to do rounds 2-5...
maybe you're not so sure anymore? I get that a lot with this type of topic no matter where I go
I don't blame you really - the more you dig into this stuff the more you start doubting long-held convictions
ok we'll see what he says.
not sure why you're defending him. he can always just jump in and say something (and not delete it immediately after so the person who gets the notification sees nothing when they go looking for it)
p.s. he is trolling tho
anyway what about the debate, want to do it then?
Austin, he is trolling me.
He just now wrote a comment reply here, which gave me a notification, then when I went to look at it there was no reply.
He didn't explain why he couldn't complete the round
He didn't apologise for not completing it
He didn't say anything but "boop" (including after I asked him what was going on)
He is playing childish games
Okay so you want to be the contender on this debate if I remake it?
Austin, could it?
Seems like it hasn't been done so far.
... are you challenging me?
Anyway, who cares about lives outside the site. I set the time limit to two weeks. Lancelot could see that before he accepted. Not my problem. You don't say yes to a job shift then call in 2 hours into it and say 'oh, sorry, I have a life going on here'
Well, you do if you're a bum, I suppose
oh yes, I got pwned (while laughing as well)
would make sense.
if he didn't wait until the last minute in the two-week argument period to write "boop"; and
if he didn't complete like five other debates in the two-week argument period; and
if he replied to me when I asked what was going on; and
if he explained what he meant by "boop" when I asked him
he's acting like a child because he disagrees with my debate premise yet can't seem to articulate that in the format of a debate.
so why would he accept the contender position?
thinks it's funny to waste people's time, or something, who knows what kids think these days
wasn't a mistake, was it? so? why the "boop?" explain yourself, kid
so? no message from you; no comment. any explanation for the "boop?"
I reckon he's taking the mickey tbh
what's going on? I said no timewasters
I think it's way too big a topic for even 10 max-size debates - but I do have another idea related to this and I will post it soon. Cheers
Thanks for voting. I thought the time would lapse with no votes.
Can we agree to:
1. no sources
2. 100% theory
3. 50/50 BoP
?
to support what has been said by Intelligence_06: please define the ambiguous terms, namely:
rich;
dysfunctional;
backward;
socially backward;
progress
and give context to:
regressive;
sexist
Interesting debate topic -- are you able to clarify what is meant by 'uncodified' for the British constitution so we can be clear?
sorry Kritikal, missed one citation and reference: https://dissolve.com/video/Footage-Dachau-Nazi-Concentration-Camp-victims-gas-royalty-free-stock-video-footage/001-D378-13-973
for "This video (graphic) shows 'Footage of Dachau Nazi Concentration Camp victims ..."
interesting one - 2 rounds also, will be quick-fire
oh yes, I see what you mean now. I will keep that in mind for future titles. thank you
Hi, sorry this is just a recreation to change the character limit, both Kritikal and I agreed to do the change and keep everything as-is, I will post my r2 within 2 days to keep with the original round time limits