Total posts: 4
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
So you're saying someone can mutilate themselves or kill themselves because it's their body, so it's their choice? The "people with cocks" can also be punished by being forced to parent the child. Also, you failed to answer my question on the cruelty of abortion. Address all my points, then we'll talk.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
My body, my choice? Baby's body, baby's choice?
Also, you're clearly ranting, because you're essentially calling me a pervert and telling me I "want to control women". When you resort to insults, it is quite obvious that you are unable to defend yourself in any other way. Your lack of factual evidence in your "arguments" amazes me.
"The unborn do not have rights, they don't have birth certificates, you can't have life insurance, they don't have social security, you can't be placed in jail for neglecting them.
To compare the born who are citizens with rights and the unborn who are a potential citizens is stupid."
I find it hilarious how you contradict yourself right here. Even you admit the unborn are potential citizens, which means that, if they were born, they would be entitled to the rights of a citizen. So, are you suggesting that it's ok to kill them because they don't have rights? In what scenarios would you justify abortion? Save another life? Recent studies suggest that you don't even need to abort a child to save a mother! Avoid a painful life for the child? Who gave you the right to take away its chance at life? Can't afford it? Give them away to be adopted! A right doesn't equal a wrong.
It's also funny that abortion activists don't care about how cruel abortion really is, all they care is that "oh, it's a fundamental human right". Ok, let's talk about "rights". So it's alright to put a needle up a girl's vagina and impale "the bunch of cells" forming inside her body? That's insanely cruel and a violation of humanitarian rights. You dehumanize a fetus which will soon become a child just to prove a point that women should have control? You're kidding, right?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
@ebuc
You disgust me. Are you saying that it's morally justified to take away the life of a child who may or may not be born? What if they were born? Who gave you the right to stop something so precious, so meaningful? Also, what does the environment have to do with anything? Humanity's end date is not determined by the amount of babies we create, but by the amount of pollution we create to destroy ourselves. Yes, the world is reaching human capacity, but that's the least of the problems right now. Right now we're facing sea ice melt and air pollution, which have the worst immediate consequences. And if I'm a virtual rapist, you're a virtual murderer. In addition, I'm confused? I'm confused? Seriously? No, I think you are. Being pro-choice does not equal being pro-abortion. You and your left-wing minions morally justify abortion, saying that you "can do it to save a life" or "if you get raped".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Pro-choice does not necessarily equate pro-abortion. I believe it is a violation of the U.S. constitution to ban the right to abortion; however, I believe the practice is unjustified, and that killing a human being, in any circumstances, is wrong. On the topic of "virtual rape", it was your choice to have sex, you created the baby, so now it is your problem; how is that virtual rape? Only 1% of abortions are actually done as a cause of rape.
Created: