mairj23

That's quite funny since one of the largest plantations was located in (NY), despite the fact that Wall Street (NY) was a slave auction. but I'm sure you knew that.
Wasn't the free-labor factories located in the (north)? Some of those Ivy league schools in the (north) were built by slaves.
I can go on and on.................

So, having a personality is considered a troll debate? As long as I'm bringing facts to the table, then a little humor/sarcasm isn't hurting anyone.
You guys need to lighten up and have a little fun.

You said that whites built America, explored etc., so why not prove it.

Lol...Is that a trick question?

If you feel as if you have the knowledge to debate this particular topic, then why not simply create the debate & invite me???

I promise to take it easy on you.

Hey Einstein, free labor created the wealth which built the economy which payed for everything else.

You held yourselves back because the pilgrims/colonizers were actually European criminals, fools & rejects who had no knowledge of agriculture etc.

Mic drop............

You're right, it's made from free labor. There would be no infrastructure, political system & foreign relations without a foundation.

Am I Correct?

I've never made threats against anyone & haven't broken any rules.

I only speak facts.

If Europeans built America then why did the slaves do all the work?

I'll wait........................................

Nahhh, I think that I chose a 2-day response time.

….At the end of the day, the US & other European nations still have higher death rates than China, which destroys any kind of refute.

I don't know, which is why I started this thread.

In the mean time, The US's death rate has topped 10,000, Italy has 69,140...…..and China is (below) 4,000.

I always backup my claims with receipts.

In the end, my opponent accepted...He based his entire argument on who has the highest death rate in which I proved him wrong.

If you or he can't except reality, then that's on you...Just remember, China has stabilized and the US/European countries' death rates are continuously rising & there's no (debate) about that.

So...showing current proof that Italy & other European countries have higher death rates than China....is considered wavering??

It doesn't get much Pro than that......Con destroyed his own argument by mentioning Rate Per Million. All he had to do was turn his tv on.

Yes, U are correct about Pro/Con & different sides of an argument but U r missing the point. I came here basically to get an opinion/solution. Of course, (questions) will eventually lead to a quote-on-quote debate in which each side must argue Pro vs Con.

The very first sentence says "... is it fair to say that God's judgement is coming into fruition for the white race via COVID-19 & natural disasters?"
I never said that "the white race is emphatically the reason for COVID-19, so prove me wrong."...No, that wasn't the case or the intention.

The disconnect started because U thought I was blaming one race of people via their historical track record. How can I converse with someone if I don't (instigate)...which means to start/initiate...a question or make a statement? Nothing more, nothing less

Nope, that's a misconception...Why? Some debates can be started by simply asking a question while not favoring either side of the argument. It can mean that the (Pro) side is confused of a situation & wants to find an answer.

Rate per million & average were used as an example. jeeeeeze

As the protagonist or progenitor, it means that I started, spearheaded & took the lead for this debate but it doesn't mean that I agree with the argument.

Are you even aware of the question marks that were used? What's the purpose of a question mark?

Lol. I bet whenever you watch the news, you'll say to yourself..."Da** it, mairj23 was right."...…"He's always freaking right!"

I'll ask again...where is this phantom "Yes" is located?

Guide me and others to where this phantom "Yes" is located.

I'll wait...………………………….

You can bomb the votes all you want, which means nothing to me because I've proved my point without ever breaking a sweat.

Yes, every race of people has committed atrocities but white people have a documented history of committing the most atrocities. How do you think that the smallest ethnic group of people were able to take control of the most global regions?

You said that whites have raised the standard of living. This tells me that you don't have a clue of white people's living standards throughout history. If you did know, then I can guarantee that you wouldn't have made that ridiculous statement.

Follow me for one second...The title of the debate is a question. I asked the question because I've noticed that white people are suffering with COVID-19 more so than other races of people.
I'm basically asking a question, but I'm definitely not making fun of the situation by asking the question if that makes sense.

Nope, I've never said that God was specifically punishing whites & I never said that God didn't infect non-whites.

I can't answer the questions because I never made those statements.

Your comment became instantly invalid by not separating three letter word with a hyphen. (three-letter word)

Oops

Did I ever say that non-whites weren't affected?

My comments always seem to vanish for no reason.

I proposed a debate about this topic to go in-depth but you refuse to step in the ring because you're terrified to face me 1 on 1.
Why won't u simply create the debate an invite me to it?

The ball is in your court.

Another false equivalency...Chinese people are indigenous to China...whites are indigenous to Europe.

You've already admitted that whites get the most welfare. There's nothing left to debate.

Lol...Bless his heart... He's giving it all he's got & is failing miserably.

You're doing the right thing by standing down & you've already admitted to whites getting the most welfare.

Don't step in the ring if you don't want to get knocked out...…….. Peace!

Lol. Stop Da Madness...Your very own lips just testified against you.

Whites are the biggest welfare case in history & history proves it.
If you feel so confident in who's given & taken, then why don't u simply create a debate about this topic.

Nahhhh, u don't have enough heart to step in the ring.

A few days ago U said, "I'm showing you who has a serious addiction to the public welfare system. 13.2% vs 41.6% please tell me which has the bigger issues."

Today u said, "Yes we pay more and receive more raw amounts of welfare because of a larger population."

mic drop.....

Who's trash talking. I'm simply stating facts.

Whites pay more taxes because your population is larger which is why whites receive the most welfare.

You're just digging a bigger hole for your lack of argument & lack of education.

Lol. U don't care because u can't come up with a solid argument.

Lol...Don't you have one more argument to make in our little debate? Guess you're trying to come up with a good enough response to make sense out of the nonsense that you've been speaking.

Black welfare recipients vs White welfare recipients
Black est. population 14% vs White est. population 60+%

No matter how hard you try to twist & reconfigure the numerical figures...It simply won't add up.

Class Dismissed

I simply take your trolling as a badge of honor because it lets me know that I'm definitely doing my job. lol

Try bringing some authentic statistics to the table next time...ok?

WTH are you talking about?
https://shakaama.blogspot.com/2009/12/there-are-more-white-people-on-welfare.html...In other words, being 14% of the population, there are more whites on welfare then there are black people in the US.

You're so butthurt for being a coward that you don't even realize that I was speaking about Asian & Hispanic immigrants who said that they would return back to their homeland...Get your facts straight buddie.

It's always about race because this is the system that you built and benefit from.

America is one big terrorist network. Everything from the Constitution to the Bill of Rights is bogus.

Are you even aware that you just agreed with what I've been saying?

Hispanic is an ethnic group that share Spanish/African/Indian culture. Spaniard is basically a Caucasian from Europe..
PR was colonized by Spain and the people tend to (Identify) with the colonizer's culture.

George Zimmerman is clearly Hispanic but he identifies as white.

You clearly don't understand ethnicities because a Spaniard and a Hispanic are not the same.

Most of PR's population isn't white. They have the option to self identify as white on the census.

Definition: A prepositional phrase is a group of words that (lacks either a verb or a subject), and that functions as a unified part of speech.

As I stated earlier, the word "comments" was never the subject to begin with.

Original sentence: "99.9% of these comments is pure nonsense." 2nd sentence: "99.9% of the comments is an ideal number."

The same sentence structure but If the first sentence is incorrect then how is the 2nd sentence correct if you exchange "is" for "are"?

Sir, a sentence can have 2 subjects which makes both examples correct. On the other hand, the word "are" can't be used correctly in both examples.

Sir, I'm referring to the percentage number, not the word "comments."

For example: 99.9% of the comments (is) an ideal number or 100% of the proceeds (is) the best estimation.

The word "are" wouldn't sound right.

Depends on if the 99.9% (is) referred to in a singular form vs a plural form.

Oops!

99.9% of these comments is pure nonsense.

I agree 100%...When someone can't handle the truth or gets exposed, vote bombing will take place.

I've literally embarrassed the so-called "best-of-the-best" debaters and vote bombing began as soon as the debates were over.
I take it as a badge of honor.