That's not what I said. I said the UN not being able to act quickly is the fault of the great powers, you said it was a "moneymaking scheme" and "pointless". It has it's hands tied due to veto power. And let's face it: if the US reeeeeally wanted to "help" Iran, they could do it through the right means by using the UN as a channel for it. Russia has it's hands tied, and I have grave doubts about China caring.
I said the US doesn't have a good track record on "liberating" countries, as most end up just hating themselves. Then, I stated that the war itself is totally different. Two diferent political situations, and drastic equipment changes have been made since Vietnam, not to mention the setting of the conflicts themselves.
Even though you misread some of the stuff I wrote (these two for example), and I did misread some of your stuff, I agree, good and fun debate, appreciate the fact it was clean and without any kind of ad hominems. Cheers.
That's not what I said. I said the UN not being able to act quickly is the fault of the great powers, you said it was a "moneymaking scheme" and "pointless". It has it's hands tied due to veto power. And let's face it: if the US reeeeeally wanted to "help" Iran, they could do it through the right means by using the UN as a channel for it. Russia has it's hands tied, and I have grave doubts about China caring.
I said the US doesn't have a good track record on "liberating" countries, as most end up just hating themselves. Then, I stated that the war itself is totally different. Two diferent political situations, and drastic equipment changes have been made since Vietnam, not to mention the setting of the conflicts themselves.
Even though you misread some of the stuff I wrote (these two for example), and I did misread some of your stuff, I agree, good and fun debate, appreciate the fact it was clean and without any kind of ad hominems. Cheers.