sadolite

Who decides what is credible and what is true?  The internet is no reliable source as I have already stated. I am an extreme skeptic of everything and don't believe everything including this, I will need more proof "A dead body or a live one" Anything is possible in this day of mass disinformation. 

Well, I'll be watching to see if John Podesta mysteriously is found dead on or after June 1 or is ever heard from again. That will be proof, if not then fake.

I already stated "beforeitwasnews" was not my source. Never heard of it until now. I want to see if someone finds the same source/sources I did and what credibility they lend it.

No, that wasn't the source. Just looking for other people to respond to see if its credible. It been well established that people will only look at sources that affirm their confirmation biases.  I looked at the source "beforeitwasnews" and could find nothing about this. Just looking for multiple sources to confirm or disprove. The internet is the worst but the most widely used source for truth. But that's how things operate on here. Hence multiple sources are needed. Just asking for help.

Truth is a hard thing to accept when you have been lied to all your life. I speak from experience.

I don't oppose it. If you don't want to get pregnant keep you dick in your pants and/or keep your legs closed. Why should I as a tax payer pay for your irresponsible life choices.

I was surfing the interweb and saw there are supposed military tribunals taking place. Those being tried include John Podesta, Huma Aberdeen, Hillary Clinton and more. Is this true? I wont post any sources as they will immediately be rejected because I am me and everyone thinks I am crazy. Maybe some of you can do your own searches and post any sources you find.  I copied and pasted this from a source:

On Thursday, the Office of Military Commissions, Rear Adm. Crandall presiding, segued away from Podesta’s fascination with small children and focused instead on criminal actions he had taken against Donald J. Trump and his family.
Rear Adm. Crandall showed the three-officer, all-female panel statements of guilt Podesta had written and signed prior to the tribunal and before the military had rescinded a plea deal removing capital punishment from the table. One statement described how Podesta, Hillary Clinton, and then-DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile planned to extort Trump into dropping out of the 2016 presidential election. The plan, which was Podesta’s idea, involved kidnapping Trump’s youngest son, Barron, and threatening to “send him home in pieces” unless Trump followed the kidnapper’s demands.
To obfuscate their participation, Podesta suggested using a third party with no ties to the DNC to hire Chinese nationals to grab Barron Trump. At the time, Barron was 10 years old and typically in the company of his mother, Melania Trump. Tuesday and Friday afternoons were the exceptions. For 2 hours on those days, Barron left his mother’s side and travelled with a Secret Service detail to posh NYC toy stores like FAO Schwartz and Kidding Around, child-friendly places the SS had rigorously vetted.
“They learned the Trumps’ schedule. They intended to either pay off the Secret Service or create a distraction to kidnap young Barron. This ill-conceived plot was not carried out, but that’s not the point. Conspiracy to commit a crime is an actionable offense. The level of hubris is mindboggling,” Rear Adm. Crandall told the panel.
Moreover, he showed the panel an email Podesta had sent to Clinton and Brazile. “Difficult but doable. Will cost a lot, probably. But if we get ‘B’ then ‘D’ will have no choice,” the email read.
A reply from Brazile said, “Let’s do it.”
“Clinton and her minion, I mean the defendant, were publicly confident Hillary would win that election. Privately, they had an abundance of fear that Trump was going to win. So fearful they wanted to kidnap his son. A profusion of both arrogance and fear,” Rear Adm. Crandall said.
After a short recess, Rear Adm. Crandall focused on a Podesta-and-Clinton-hatched plot to assassinate President Donald J. Trump during his visit to Vatican City on May 23-24, 2017.
Podesta’s written confession told a horrific tale about hiring someone to murder Trump at the Apostolic Palace. In this case, the plan to kill Trump failed, but still a life was lost.
Rear Adm. Crandall read from Podesta’s confession: “It was both our idea to eliminate Trump because we knew Pence would be more agreeable to work with. Hillary had connections in the Vatican, and she asked me to contact a man I knew only as Vittore Mazzi. We wired him the equivalent of $2,500,000 and told him we didn’t want details, only results. He wrote back, cryptically, he would poison Trump’s dinner plate and make sure it was only Trump who got poisoned food. Since we were not expecting to hear back until the job was completed or network news announced Trump was dead, I didn’t check the email address he responded to until after the dinner was scheduled. If I’d checked earlier, I would’ve told him to find a different way to kill Trump, because we know, of course, that a food tester accompanies him on most domestic and all trips abroad. I learned shortly thereafter that someone besides Trump had eaten food from his plate and died. The administration covered it up because there isn’t supposed to be public knowledge that a president employs a food tester, and his administration was afraid public dissemination would damage public opinion of the Secret Service. That’s what I learned. And I can only assume they asked the Vatican to keep it under wraps.”
“The defendant was a pitiful schemer,” Rear Adm. Crandall said, addressing the panel. “It seems that when Clinton tasked you with planning these crimes, things always went awry. Your involvement is indisputable. Regardless the statements and emails, out of his own mouth he admitted to these crimes at Clinton’s trial. This commission could spend weeks or even months highlighting his expansive criminal career, but we have others to bring to justice.”
A tearful and sullen Podesta slouched in his chair. Beside him, his counsel, Trisha Anderson, stared at the screen of her MacBook and rapped at the keys. She slowly rose to her feet and with an acrimonious smirk on her face, asked to make a statement.
“I remind the commission that my client’s admissions of guilt were based on a good faith agreement. JAG has pulled a bait-and-switch on Mr. Podesta. Had he known he might receive capital punishment, he would not have cooperated. The U.S. military is subverting justice, and Mr. Podesta, by no means a picture-perfect man—who among us is?—is being railroaded. I ask that you ladies, you officers, consider JAG’s behavior before deciding Mr. Podesta’s outcome,” Trisha Anderson said.
Rear Adm. Crandall gave a brief review of the charges and reminded the panel that a military commission, unlike a civilian court, needed only a majority vote to convict. He also said the tribunal, again unlike a civilian trial, does not have a separate penalty phase and that judgment be rendered once a determination of guilt is reached. Without a moment’s hesitation, the panel announced it had reached a verdict, finding Podesta guilty on all charges. It recommended Podesta receive capital punishment for his grievous crimes.
“Ms. Anderson, does your client understand the verdict, and does he have a preference as to how this sentence will be carried out?” Rear Adm. Crandall asked.
Podesta broke down in tears, his shoulders heaving fitfully.
“You’re murdering him, you decide,” Trisha Anderson said.
“Very well. This commission decrees John Podesta will face capital punishment by firing squad, the act to be carried out on 1 June. This session of the military commission on tribunals is concluded,” Rear Adm. Crandall said.
As Podesta was helped to his feet and escorted from the tribunal chamber, his counsel said she would appeal the decision to anyone and everyone willing to listen.

I think you are determined to keep the status quo no matter how much human suffering occurs by keeping it. It easier for you to let people you don't know to die and suffer than taking a position that would seem non main stream status quo publicly and on record.

Is there anything that is perfect? The argument always circles back to "what if" I can make that argument endlessly about anything. Does one want results or does one want to say what if forever about everything and take no action because they don't want to ever take a position because they are to chicken shit. The what ifs of the world are the staus quos of the world and stand in the way of everything that would make things better, offer less suffering ,or more efficient. The what ifs of the world think nothing can ever be better than what they have been indoctrinated to believe. If there is no prefect alternative than nothing is better than the status quo. There is no amount of human suffering that wont be tolerated by the status quo mentality in order to not have to take a different path or try something new.

Yet you care nothing about the suffering and deaths of the victims. That's just acceptable collateral damage. 

I made no argument for or against ethics. Ethics no longer exists among society and govt. What you do  as an individual is the only concept of ethics that still exists. 

Ethics doesn't exist anymore. Any behavior or act can be justified in todays world. The govt is spending the country into oblivion ruining every man woman and childs financial future. That isn't unethical so why would murder be unethical? Ethics is a red herring argument. Ethics is up to the  individual. Ethics is meaningless to a society of people.  This is proved every single day of the year 24/7.

it doesn't matter if I accept my death now or anytime in the future. I will absolutely die anyway

You look for perfection in life, nothing is perfect. Your arguments are no different than you wanting a 100% guarantee that you will never get hurt or be the victim of anything.  Its a red herring argument. The % who would not be guilty is an acceptable loss as with anything that is permitted but still kills people. I am sure you have no problem with 50,000 people dying in car crashes every year. Have you ever advocated for banning cars,  airplanes, motorcycles the list goes on. All innocent of any crime but still dead. The number of innocent in prison right now out of tens of thousands that would be put to death wrongly could be counted on 2 fingers or even 1 most likely.  I would wager none.

Killing murders, rapists and pedophiles reduces recidivism and acts as a deterrent  for future acts by people who would do such things. It is not a deterrent if people who do  such things are allowed to continue to live outside or inside of prison.

Everyone has an opinion

Yes. Both by god and man. Mostly god.  If I was allowed to change mans law all unrepentant convicted pedophiles rapists' and murder's currently in prison would be immediately executed. 

"Human perception of time was significantly different before clocks and calendars were invented.' Makes no difference, they still lived with the assumption of time existing. Perception is meaningless without time.

If you did debate this whos sources would be acceptable? I don't believe a fucking word any govt agency says. Their position changes like I change my about whether to eat cereal for breakfast or not and their covid  policies are based on complete arbitrary BS that have no scientific standing or logic what so ever. It isn't even scientifically debatable. The only real science about the effectiveness of masks come from the mask manufacturers and none will say any masks they make not designed for filtering viruses do anything to stop a virus. Oh you can sit in a restaurant filled with people but cant sit in a church filled with people, Such complete arbitrary BS based on nothing. Covid is about believing what ever BS you want to believe.  Truth and fact are non existent. You will reject anything that doesn't fit your media/govt indoctrinated narrative about covid.

 "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." 

I asked this question when people first started losing their minds about covid. For how many years will you wear a mask before you say enough is enough. Its been established that years is a given now. Now I will ask in decades. How many decades will you wear a mask before you say enough is enough

A state with the largest energy reserves in the nation , runs out of energy.  Clearly a full on fucking retard govt ass wipe  tyrannical fuck face is responsible for this full on retardation. You cant even make stupidity like this up. Its intentional. Its completely artificial and intentional. Govt is 100% pure evil.

I don't believe there will ever be another election. I think the country will go full on retard communist. 

In all reality he is not opening schools "Only one day a week" Most businesses that were forced to close are out of business and will never return. Biden plan would only reopen half the schools ‘one day a week’ by end of April"  https://nypost.com/2021/02/09/biden-plan-would-only-reopen-half-the-schools-one-day-a-week/

"About 60% of businesses that have closed during the coronavirus pandemic will never reopen, and restaurants have suffered the most, according to new data from Yelp.

Here's the goal post. List a policy that is beneficial to America and the taxpayer. With in that goal post you can include regulations, tax reduction, and any policy that is beneficial to an American and not someone not from this country. All affect both the taxpayer and the country. 

Soo I read through all of the posts and determined two things that someone said was good. One policy benefits Muslims from other countries and one policy is supposedly good for the environment but no proof that it actually is good or harms the environment if not instituted. So nothing basically for taxpayers or America. 

My beliefs are built on what I see and happens to me directly. Many consider my beliefs to be conservative. They are very simple. Govt proves everyday just how wasteful, corrupt and useless it is so I want as little of it as possible. Basically get the fuck out of my face and let me keep what I earn.  The federal govt should provide for the defense of the nation and building roads and bridges all the rest should go to the states.

Really?  Go rob a bank get caught and  see who the "you" is.  Argument for the sake of argument. "YOU" dont break the law because "YOU" are afraid of the punishment. Now tell me some shit about how you commit felonies on a daily bases and have no fear of the law or punishment

I like all music and actually did see them in concert but not my favorite, Slayer and Stevie Ray are at the top.

Anyone attempting to define redneck is only using their own opinionated indoctrinated narrative  of what it means or stands for. I'm a redneck and proud of it and the best part is, I have money and ain't poor. I'm sure most of you have been taught and indoctrinated to think a redneck is some one toothed backwoods idiot with an IQ of 70.  Rednecks will inherit the earth. while the arrogant and repugnant starve to death and kill each other when the shit hits the fan.

There is no money to give to anyone. I hope they never give them out for my children's sake. 

Now that Trump has been  acquitted from that farcical clown show of a rogue Congress,  The same Congress will will now peruse a  vote on article 3 of the 14th amendment to try and over turn the acquittal of the clown show they just had. What say you all?

"why do conservatives care about the size of the government?" The bigger govt gets the smaller the people become and the more tyrannical govt gets.  I give you the year 2021 as an example.

That's about how much my health insurance costs per week

All I know about the Obama Presidency that I can prove is that my health insurance tripled in cost, my taxes went up, more regulations affected my business negatively and gas prices doubled or tripled depending on where you live. Nothing positive to report on my end. Just more expansion of govt with no cost benefit that I can see.

You didn't grow up in a ultra conservative home you grew up in a tyrannical prison. I am ultra conservative and don't believe in any of those things.

What the senate says or thinks is or isn't constitutional is irrelevant meaningless. The supreme court decides that. Chief Justice Roberts already weighed in on this, as he is the one to preside over the impeachment of a President. He wants nothing to do with the clown show. That pretty much says it all. Congress is acting in a rogue manner making up shit as they go. For instance: Thinking they now haver the power to vote on what is and isn't constitutional. Banana Republic.

You are assuming the rule of law still exists.

You do know it is the judicial branch of govt that determines the constitutionality of any law or act of congress. Congress can write any dumb ass law , vote to impeach the president, or declare what ever they want. But what they can not  do is say or vote that  its laws or actions are constitutional.  The constitution and the judicial branch of govt would be meaningless and serve no purpose if they could. The rule of law would be meaningless. The law would be what ever they say it is. Constitutionality is for the judicial branch of govt to determine. Also, the "LAW" says the the Chief Justice shall preside over the impeachment of any President. Not some jack ass yahoo they pull out of their ass. 

Congress voted today on the constitutionality of its own actions. Bwhahahahahahahahahaha

OK then I 'll use that as advice on how to put food on the table, and I guess giving special attention and privileges  to limited groups of people helps America and the taxpayer. Meanwhile Gas is up 50 cents a gallon, is that good?

What goal posts?  No one has even put forth one policy and explained how it is good for America and benefits the taxpayer.  Who gives a shit about some isolated group of people who don't even live in this country. Why should I care about them at all? 

So which policies are good for America and the tax payer again?

I said Muslim ban with a question mark

How do those policies make any improvements in anyone's ability to engage in the free market system and earn money?

Muslim Ban?, I got my own problems to deal with. there isn't a single Muslim on this planet that could give a shit about anybody's problems but their own Just like me.

A long list, but only 3 policies explained and of those three, worthless to me as far as putting food on the table based on my limited ability to interpret your explanations.

"How, do you think, a few more dollars on you pay check next month, will benefit your Great Grandchildren?' How will a few less dollars in my pay check  benefit them is my response? If a bigger pay check wont benefit them then by default you are saying me having less money will help them. How?

No see, you have to explain it to me.  Muslim ban is vague and lacks any context.

I would like to create this thread for people such as myself who cant see how the executive orders and policies of Joe Biden are helping the taxpayer  or are good for America. Here's how it works: Since I cant see anything that he has done  that is good for me as a taxpayer or good for America, I am obviously to stupid or indoctrinated  and don't posses the necessary critical thinking skills to see how his policies and executive orders are actually helping me and are beneficial to the country.  So if anyone could list any and all policies that are helping me or the country could you please explain in detail what those policies are and how those policies are in fact helping?   As a new policies are instituted you can update me on these new policies and how they are helping me or the country for the duration of Joe Biden's Presidency.