secularmerlin's avatar

secularmerlin

A member since

3
3
3

Total posts: 7,093

Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Appeal to authority and a bald assertion. You are on a roll buddy.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Yes if I believed you by wrote without bothering to examine your arguments critically for logical and structural flaws we would not have these issues that is true. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Like or dislike is irrelevant. My personal feelings are in no way involved when I tell youn that the tautology you have just presented does not answer the question that I asked you. I am relatively certain however (based on past experience) that "I will not answer your question" was a true statement on your part.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
That did not answer my question. Allow me to rephrase. What is the detectable difference between a truth that has not been confirmed and a falsehood tgat has not been disproved?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
What is the difference between what is comfortably true and knowledge?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
That is not what I asked. 
Let's try again. 

Yes or no, knowledge is revealed rather than discovered?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Yes or no, knowledge is revealed not discovered?


Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
You have described an unjust situation. Perhaps you explained it wrong?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
That was an observation.

If knowledge is revealed rather than discovered and god does not reveal it to me then it is his fault that I do not know. To judge someone for the actions of another is fundamentally unjust.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Then Christ runs a kangaroo court and I have no reason to accept any such ruling as fair. Indeed if such a figure exists and decides to condemn me to eternal hellfire I cannot stop him but I will take what small comfort I can in the knowledge that his ruling was immoral, unfair and that nothing I could have done would have changed it.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
If any god(s) exist and if knowledge of said god(s) must be revealed rather than discovered then it is up to said god(s) to reveal themself(ves) to me. Ergo if anyone does not believe then it is a direct result of the god(s). I suppose that makes the god(s) evil.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Neither I or any man converts another. Only when someone out of their own God given free will chooses to repent of their iniquity and accept Christ into their heart does that healing work begin.

My position on theism has nothing to do with iniquity. This is therefore irrelevant.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
You literally cannot benefit me (by which I take it you mean bring my beliefs more in line with yours though I remain unconvinced of the potential benefits of this outcome) unless you can make a rational argument in defense of your position. If your goal is really to help me (convert me) may I suggest that your method is ineffective.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
It takes the same amount of thought to dismiss something immediately as it does to believe something immediately.
Good and evil have nothing to do with my position on theism. This is mostly meaningless in the context of this discussion. Whether or not it is meaningless in another context is irrelevant.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
That seems mostly meaningless. An attempt to sound deep is no substitute for depth.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
I'm pretty sure it is shorthand for someone who agrees with Mopac on the subject of religion. If this is incorrect please provide an example of someone who disagrees with Mopac on the subject of religion and yet has this quality.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@keithprosser
Unless your on a quiz show.
Priceless

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
If you had all knowledge, you still would not know God. An undefiled intellect is more valuable than all the knowledge in the world.
What does this even mean? I would hate to think you were just spouting empty platitudes as though they constitute an actual argument.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Reason is not sufficient to enlighten a darkened mind at enmity with The Truth.
This seems mostly meaningless. Darkened mind could mean anything. Perhaps it is just a convenient way to dismiss ideas you find uncomfortable. This still fails to show you even untestand my position. If you do not understand my position you cannot hope to argue logically against it. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Truth is not revealed it is discovered. The Greeks tortured circles until they gave up the secret of pi.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@keithprosser
He's a monomaniac.
He is what he has been made by his biology and circumstances. Nothing more.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
As I said, I believe you lack discernment so that should give you an idea of how seriously I take your whining.
Ad hominem is no substitute for a well reasoned argument. You fail to understand my underlying objection to your arguments or you simply refuse to address it.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@keithprosser
I think if we're nice to him he'll go away.
I don't want him to go away I want him to join in our discourse instead of derailing and discouraging it.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
As I suspected. I really am wasting my time conversing with you. You have not tried to understand my position and have no intention of doing so and this makes it impossible for you to communicate effectively with me.

This saddens me.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Just so I know I'm not just barking at the moon can you even explain to me your understanding of my objection to your position?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
At this point you are just repeating yourself with different words. You clearly have no ears to hear me.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
I see no reason to view that story as more than a legend.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
This is a category error. Belief is not externally detectable the way that activities (such as basket ball) can be. You Mopac cannot know the beliefs of others.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Is the fallacy that I do not agree with the way you identify things? I'm not sure that disagreeing with you is a logical fallacy in and of itself.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
I am merely making an observation. You are making The no true Scotsman argument and dressing it up with a false analogy thay commits a category error between a biological distinction and a definitional distinction.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Also zombie Jesus day is over.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Happy zombie Jesus day everyone!
-->
@Mopac
Dressing up the no true Scotsman argument with a false analogy does not make it anything but the no true Scotsman argument.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Free Will & The Christian - Get Out.
-->
@ronjs
An omniscient being can give free will to who He pleases, and he would not want automatons.

Omniscience is logically incoherent. Perhaps you mean maximally powerful.
Created:
0
Posted in:
supernatural things are likely to occur
-->
@ronjs
If there is a being who has an all encompassing and irrefutable plan which applies to each of us personally and guides us through our everyday lives or there may be freewill. The two ideas are incompatible however so niether you nor any god(s) can have it both ways.

Created:
0
Posted in:
If X, then Y?
-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph
If pigs could fly then having high quality windshield wiper fluid would take on a new importance.
Created:
0
Posted in:
If X, then Y?
-->
@keithprosser
Wasteful is not the same as logically incoherent. Good point.
Created:
0
Posted in:
If X, then Y?
-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph
So what your saying is that it would be possible for some god(s) to attribute us with freewill but then to disallow the use of said freewill? I suppose that is technically possibke but I'm not sure what distinguishes that from simply having no freewill, especially in practice terms.
Created:
0
Posted in:
If X, then Y?
-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph
If a being exists which has an all encompassing and irrefutable plan which applies to each of us personally and guides us through our everyday lives then freewill is logically incoherent.

It would depend.  You say "guides" as if we have a free will, but he simply imposes on it when it goes against his plan.  Small difference.

If you're saying that he determines all of our actions in advanced, then I agree. 
I believe the underline and emboldened section is enough to clear up which of the two positions I am referring to.

I do understand that it is not a position universally held by all theists but I have certainly heard theists claim both the all encompassing plan and freewill.
Created:
0
Posted in:
If X, then Y?
-->
@Wrick-It-Ralph
If a being exists which has an all encompassing and irrefutable plan which applies to each of us personally and guides us through our everyday lives then freewill is logically incoherent.

If the two ideas are logically contradictory then can a belief in both positions be rationally justified?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Free Will & The Christian - Get Out.
-->
@keithprosser
Many Christians claim that the Yahweh has an all encompassing and irrefutable plan. Whether the Yahweh is truly omniscient or merely maximally knowledgable this is inconsistent with the idea of freewill.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Free Will & The Christian - Get Out.
-->
@Stephen
I am not even called  christianophobic
This is likely because you did not strongly imply that anyone who follows the bible must be either a dangerous criminal or doing it wrong in this post.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
-->
@EtrnlVw
Secular, you wouldn't be harassing people would you? usually you're the mature one...
Maybe a little. Hopefully everyone will forgive me this small (and hopefully out of character) transgression. I just couldn't resist. ROTFL

Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
-->
@keithprosser
A pre-existing consciousness is all very well, but it has to be a consciousness with the power to create a material universe, estmated to be 1.5 × 10^53 kg.
My consciousness can't produce a microgram!   So we aren't really talking about a consciousness - we're talking about God, aren't we?
Indeed the argument that all things that began to exist must have a cause might be reworked to all things that began to exist are a rearrangement of things that already existed. Certainly no corporeal beings (the only sort we have observed "creating") are not on closer examination creating anything but instead reorganizing the constituent parts of things that already exist.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
Eternal didn't include additional commentary with his response for me to respond.

A pre-existing consciousness is all very well, but it has to be a consciousness with the power to create a material universe, estmated to be 1.5 × 10^53 kg.
That's because you never paid attention (or didn't care to) when I've said many times that energy is present with awareness, conscious activity. This is why energy even exists, both energy and consciousness are not created or destroyed they are eternal.  Now follow.. this is real simple, the Creator uses this energy to manifest creation on all conscious levels. Do you study quantum physics? and how energy is isolated to create forms? this is why I always ask people to look at how energy operates in our own universe, why is it even there and why does it produce intelligence? why do intelligent processes even occur? it's because it's first conscious intelligence that uses energy through the processes we observe through science and spirituality to create things, stars, planets, galaxies ect ect.
So yes, the Creator absolutely has the ability to create a material universe, you're living in it.
My consciousness can't produce a microgram!   So we aren't really talking about a consciousness - we're talking about God, aren't we?
Actually whatever you put your energy and attention on you can produce. It's only because of the physical body that it takes so long to do it, when you're hungry and you've already thought about where you want to go to eat your consciousness is already there, you're physical body just has to catch up and eventually it gets there. If you want to build a house you first desire it, then se it, then plan it then execute it and this all happened because you first thought  it. With the Creator, the nature of consciousness (without form) and energy that limitation of a physical body is no longer an obstacle. Consciousness is instantaneous and God does things on grand atomic scales but it's a process to get from awareness to energy to material structure. The fun part is that the worlds beyond this one are so dynamic because they have less limitations, the less physical mass consciousness is restricted by the more freedom and creative power/ability.
Here is additional commentary. This is your chance.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Free Will & The Christian - Get Out.
Still no luck getting a christian perspective?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
-->
@Fallaneze
Still waiting for you to argue with eternal the way you argued with kieth and myself, you know since taking a poll doesn't preclude further discussion and it's always best to explore both sides of an issue.
Created:
0
Posted in:
If X, then Y?
-->
@mustardness
You insult yourself every time you claim I'm not using plain English.  You have no desire to understand anything Ive ever stated. 
This is an ego problem on you end, not mine.


2} Spiriti-2,  physical reality ergo an occupied space aka Observed Time { /\/\/ } is composed of fermionic matter and bosonic forces,

3} Spirit-3, metaphysical-3, occupied space gravity (  ) aka positive shaped geodesic shape of Space

4} Spirit-4, metaphysical-3, occupied space dark energy )( aka negative shaped geodesic shape ofSpace.

.........(  )(  )...........side-view perspective of great { equlatorial } circle{s} bisection of negatvie and postive shaped geodesic of Space

.......( ( ) ) ).....birds-eye view perspective great equatorial circle bisection of negative and positive shaped geodesic of Space

OO or (OO) or O--O as simple consciousness{ twoness-othernerss }

{ \*/ } aA more complex biological/soul consciousness

{ * * } as more complex bilateral animal consciousness

{* i *} as most complex human consciousness

* i * } as woman being the most complex individual conciousness entity of Universe

...(/\/\)............................................................................................................
(\/\/\/\/\).... as the finiteoccupied spaceUniverse being the most complex set.
...(/\/\).............................................................................................................

If X dimension exists then Y and Z are inherently included ergo Space = XYZ

If Space exists then Observed Time { /\/\/ | is inherently included ergo the term Space-Timecame to exist.

...S( * t * )S...

Pi^3{ XYZ-3D} = 31.00 62 7 66 80

Spinal cord segments in different species (for reference purposes):
     Dog: 8 cervical; 13 thoracic; 7 lumbar; 3 sacral; & 5 caudal = 36 total

     Cat: 8 cervical; 13 thoracic; 7 lumbar; 3 sacral; & 5 caudal = 36 total

     Bovine: 8 cervical; 13 thoracic; 6 lumbar; 5 sacral; & 5 caudal = 37 total

     Horse: 8 cervical; 18 thoracic; 6 lumbar; 5 sacral; & 5 caudal = 42 total

     Swine: 8 cervical; 15/14 thoracic; 6/7 lumbar; 4 sacral; & 5 caudal = 38 total

     Human: 8 cervical; 12 thoracic; 5 lumbar; 5 sacral; & 1 coccygeal = 31 total

The 5-fold{ phi-fold } icosa{20}hedron has 31 axi ergo 31 great circle/polygonal planes LINK
Ah insults followed by exactly the same post that I already told you once I don't understand copy paste identical. Bold choice.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
-->
@keithprosser
There is currently no way to know what was going on at 'time zero' or any earlier time.  It is hoped by many that a theory that reconciles QM and GR will reveal what is currently hidden.

No philosopher predicted the strangeness of QM or of relativity.   The secrets of nature are hard won.   I expect that when a new Einstein works it out, the solution will be an affront to common sense - for one generation.   These days we take the oddness of QM and GR in our stride and no one today thinks it odd that cats can be alive and dead at the same time.   Perhaps the generation after us will laugh that we were convinced 'nothing comes of nothing' or 'actual infinities are impossible'.  How could they think that!

There is no way we will solve such deep problems using Aristotelian syllogisms and word-play.  I believe that the solution will seem bizarre and impossible - the limitation is in our heads.   To quote JBS Haldane,

"I have no doubt that in reality the future will be vastly more surprising than anything I can imagine. Now my own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose."

Well stated 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
-->
@Fallaneze
There is nothing to suggest anything.

There is literally no evidence of any event before the big bang or indeed even at the first moment of the big bang.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Do you believe that the universe originated from consciousness?
-->
@Fallaneze
It sounds to me like the Big Bang represents the beginning of the universe. I don't see how you arrived at the conclusion that logic is insufficient to make a determination about the universe's origin. 
Only the begining of the universe in its current form. Other than that we do not know. There is no way to test any hypothesis and therefore all hypotheses are poor hypotheses. 

Created:
0