@Ragnar Thanks for the comment :)
@Bsh1 - This debate was really fun. It will be great if we can find another interesting topic to debate at some point.
I apologize for taking the discussion into voting, but I just had to clear this up. I was under the assumption that the kritik you accused me of in round one ( i.e, 'the only punishment of arrest is the act of arresting a person', and 'this is not a debate about the entire justice and healthcare systems') was your main area of focus, because that as what you fell back on to respond to many of my arguments. I responded to this claim in round 2 (Observation 1). I thought the kritik you accused me of in round two fell into he same category as the previous one (regarding the features of the prison system), so I didn't feel the need to respond to it individually.
Just for your information, regarding your idea that I was kritiking the resolution, I responded to this the first thing in round two (see Observation 1). I didn't have enough space to address it again in the next round (due to the character limit), but I felt like my response in round 2 was sufficient.
I'm really sorry. There seems to have been a misunderstanding about the sources in round two. I thought I had set the google doc to 'share'. Turns out I had not. In any case, the link is below. You should be able to access it now. If not, please inform me.
Thanks to @bsh1 for this debate. It was really fun, and I'm glad to have debated an accomplished and capable opponent such as yourself, who takes these debates seriously, rather than someone who doesn't put much thought and effort into what they say.
@Ragnar Thanks for the comment :)
@Bsh1 - This debate was really fun. It will be great if we can find another interesting topic to debate at some point.
I apologize for taking the discussion into voting, but I just had to clear this up. I was under the assumption that the kritik you accused me of in round one ( i.e, 'the only punishment of arrest is the act of arresting a person', and 'this is not a debate about the entire justice and healthcare systems') was your main area of focus, because that as what you fell back on to respond to many of my arguments. I responded to this claim in round 2 (Observation 1). I thought the kritik you accused me of in round two fell into he same category as the previous one (regarding the features of the prison system), so I didn't feel the need to respond to it individually.
Just for your information, regarding your idea that I was kritiking the resolution, I responded to this the first thing in round two (see Observation 1). I didn't have enough space to address it again in the next round (due to the character limit), but I felt like my response in round 2 was sufficient.
Just reminding you that you have around an hour left to post your final argument.
I'm really sorry. There seems to have been a misunderstanding about the sources in round two. I thought I had set the google doc to 'share'. Turns out I had not. In any case, the link is below. You should be able to access it now. If not, please inform me.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PdkHl-t_vdwPQGMYFsv4tkUzx2sJTppxrUj-ZFXTccI/edit?usp=sharing
I hope you're planning on posting your argument soon. You have around an hour and a half left.
Just reminding you that you have around eleven hours to post your next argument.
Just reminding you that you have about nine hours to post your argument.
Thanks. Take your time.
Thanks for this debate and the detailed feedback. I learnt a lot, and look forward to more such debates.
Thanks to @bsh1 for this debate. It was really fun, and I'm glad to have debated an accomplished and capable opponent such as yourself, who takes these debates seriously, rather than someone who doesn't put much thought and effort into what they say.
@bsh1 am I right in assuming round 2 is for rebuttal of each other's cases and round 3 is for re-building arguments?
@bsh1 my case will be up in about 6-8 hours. Sorry for the delay.
In this debate, who's pro jury nullification, and who's against it?