Having a constructive discussion about this with you would require you to possess a certain baseline level of reading comprehension ability, and it is clear that you do not.
Lmao. That's retarded. I don't need to review every single argument made in the debate. This debate hinged on a single clash (corporal punishment vs. restorative justice), and I explained why CON won that clash.
No reasonable person believes in that definition of free will. Every free will advocate I know would concede that environmental factors exert causal influence over our decision-making processes. But the presence of that influence doesn't negate the existence of free will.
Oh it certainly exists in the developing world. But I don't see any convincing evidence that it exists in developed countries such as the United States.
That was the 69th comment. Nice.
Nah.
Having a constructive discussion about this with you would require you to possess a certain baseline level of reading comprehension ability, and it is clear that you do not.
You, like most of the people on this intellectual cesspool of a site, are not worth my time. Sorry!
These really aren't the type of people you should be getting voting advice from. They're deeply unintelligent.
None of you have any clue what you're talking about.
That is objectively false. If you are incapable of basic reading comprehension, then you should not be a vote moderator.
Lmao. That's retarded. I don't need to review every single argument made in the debate. This debate hinged on a single clash (corporal punishment vs. restorative justice), and I explained why CON won that clash.
"As we shift to an increasingly post-industrial context, the need for individual submission to institutions of power will only increase."
Damn, that is bleak.
No reasonable person believes in that definition of free will. Every free will advocate I know would concede that environmental factors exert causal influence over our decision-making processes. But the presence of that influence doesn't negate the existence of free will.
Oh it certainly exists in the developing world. But I don't see any convincing evidence that it exists in developed countries such as the United States.
All those arguments seem to presume the continued existence of institutional sexism. I guess that's where the root cause of our disagreement lies.
I'm really curious as to what your arguments would have been... I don't view this as a defensible position.
I will be following this closely.
I think the colors are supposed to indicate it... would be better if it just said "PRO" and "CON"
But anyways, I'm CON, and whoever accepts the debate would be PRO.