It clearly states in the description that once someone violates the rule, they lose and the rules no longer apply. I made sure of that when you held the same technicality against me earlier.
I wouldn't want you to but there's no rule I can implement to prevent that, and it would at least prove you read the description. At least the character rule is something.
Word count includes block quotes:
https://studenthelp.secure.griffith.edu.au/app/answers/detail/a_id/2511/~/are-direct-quotes-counted-in-my-word-limit%3F#:~:text=The%20general%20rule%20is%20that,%2C%20quotes%2C%20lists%2C%20etc.
I really think you're looking for excuses to vote against me.
I believe you did avoid voting for me just a few days ago based on that very rule. Also, I think lazy people will avoid the debate instead of making their arguments longer.
I hardly think the rule is absurd or swindles anyone out of a productive debate. If anything, it filters out people who would only post low-effort arguments, which was a big issue on debate.org before I implemented the rule. There are similar rules against forfeiting for the same reason.
Just a moment ago you defended your position with a legal statute. So does the reply you linked to. So it appears I did tell you something you didn't know.
This debate isn't over legality, so I'm not sure why you're citing a legal statute. But I'd be happy to debate you on the same topic once this one is over.
I've seen a lot of variations proposed which is why I was very specific in the description. What you're describing is technically still capitalism. The term democratic socialism is thrown around quite a bit, but it's actually what I described.
It clearly states in the description that once someone violates the rule, they lose and the rules no longer apply. I made sure of that when you held the same technicality against me earlier.
I wouldn't want you to but there's no rule I can implement to prevent that, and it would at least prove you read the description. At least the character rule is something.
It won't lower my ELO because mine is lower than his right now.
Word count includes block quotes:
https://studenthelp.secure.griffith.edu.au/app/answers/detail/a_id/2511/~/are-direct-quotes-counted-in-my-word-limit%3F#:~:text=The%20general%20rule%20is%20that,%2C%20quotes%2C%20lists%2C%20etc.
I really think you're looking for excuses to vote against me.
Which is allowed if you cite sources. Word count includes block quotes:
https://studenthelp.secure.griffith.edu.au/app/answers/detail/a_id/2511/~/are-direct-quotes-counted-in-my-word-limit%3F#:~:text=The%20general%20rule%20is%20that,%2C%20quotes%2C%20lists%2C%20etc.
Those quotes are part of my argument. They're also pretty relevant to the debate.
Sir.Lancelot continues to berate me for not voiding the rule. Does it sound like he cares about the spirit of the debate or about winning?
I believe you did avoid voting for me just a few days ago based on that very rule. Also, I think lazy people will avoid the debate instead of making their arguments longer.
No one's stopping you from posting it. You might even win if the voters all hate the rule.
I hardly think the rule is absurd or swindles anyone out of a productive debate. If anything, it filters out people who would only post low-effort arguments, which was a big issue on debate.org before I implemented the rule. There are similar rules against forfeiting for the same reason.
I haven't read this one, but did you say you wanted to vote on this? Voting period is almost over.
I use the same opening repeatedly, so I won't be surprised if Sir.Lancelot has his written already.
Saw your vote. Will be interested to see what arguments you use.
Termination of a pregnancy via killing of the unborn embryo/zygote/fetus
Only 4 days left to vote!
Push, only 5 days left. Should be easy given concession.
Push
Push for votes
Sounds good
Voted!
Push, only 5 days left
Plz vote! Only a week.
Push, plz vote
Bump
Okay, thanks =)
Plz vote! Deadline is quick.
Vote plz!
Plz vote! Voting period is only one week.
Plz vote!
Push
You have a lot of confidence for a reply guy who can't defend his arguments.
False. I am less intelligent for having read your arguments. Perhaps you can present your opinions in a formal debate, where I can correct them.
Just a moment ago you defended your position with a legal statute. So does the reply you linked to. So it appears I did tell you something you didn't know.
Abortion was around long before the US legal system. Besides, immoral things are legal all the time.
This debate isn't over legality, so I'm not sure why you're citing a legal statute. But I'd be happy to debate you on the same topic once this one is over.
I will warn you that most of my opponents are left speechless by opening argument.
I've seen a lot of variations proposed which is why I was very specific in the description. What you're describing is technically still capitalism. The term democratic socialism is thrown around quite a bit, but it's actually what I described.
Any of you interested?
This is really just a semantic argument. A human life begins at conception, but cells can be considered alive.
Someone's out for blood
I'm fine leaving this up to whiteflame, but I'll be annoyed if my first loss is on a technicality.
Once someone loses, the debate is over. You can't lose a debate that someone else has already lost.
I can't do rated because my account is new. Once I can I'll debate you under those conditions.
Please vote!
Please vote!
It's true in binary.
I am willing to debate you next if you are interested.
I'm using wordcounter.net to count characters, totals may be a bit off if you're using a different software (spaces, enter, etc.)
Plz vote when this debate is finished!