Nope. Only the Bible claims mass-witnesses. No other religion can be proven except for Judaism. Listen, if you want to debate this let me know and we can make a new debate.
You err in negating mass-witness testimony. All other religions rely on a single witness, but Judaism relies on millions of Jews witnessing an event in the desert.
If having a few disputing sources to Caesar's existence is satisfactory enough for you, then how much more so is having millions of witnesses? We know Moses authored the Bible, too, among others. Two major world religions, both Christianity and Islam accept the Torah's account.
How do you know the sources that you accept at face value are true? You accept that Caesar existed, yet shouldn't you be questioning the source of that, too? Again, if Moses lied, the Jews would simply have rejected him. But he didn't and as a result, we have millions of witnesses. You cannot discount millions of witnesses. Is it reasonable to say every single one of them was also lying? That makes no sense to me.
No one saw G-d. “You cannot see my face, for man shall not see me and live.” Exodus 33:20. Again, millions of Jews witnessed the Sinai revelation. You would admit that George Washington, Caesar, Alexander the Great, and Columbus existed, even though you cannot ask anybody about them and even though you rely only on what the sources say about them. Yet you are convinced that Caesar existed, but be consistent, and assume Caesar never existed, too. Yet you will never make this claim because it is foolish. It is so with the Bible.
There is proof that Judaism is the correct religion. G-d revealed His Bible in front of mass-witnesses— to millions of Jews. The Sinai revelation occurred because millions of people saw it. If Moses came to the Israelites and lied that they experienced the revelation they would never accept him. The testimony of millions of Jews in the Bible proves the Exodus happened as described. What masses today claim the purported events as their history other than the Jews?
Since The Bible is a guaranteed source, what it says, whatever it says, must be true. Yes, many hands helped write/edit the Bible, but the vast majority of it was written by Moses. The irrefutable evidence of Genesis proves my point.
I think there were Jews in Egypt. The irrefutable evidence of Genesis proves this. But I don't think the Jews built the pyramids. Heck, I don't think the Egyptians built the pyramids for that matter.
To Con's point, yes, Egyptians did not have slaves, save the Jews. The Bible is clear.
I left the debate because there weren't enough characters. Therefore, I made a new debate about the same topic. You can view the new, current debate about the pyramids here: https://www.debateart.com/debates/2807-the-egyptians-did-not-build-the-pyramids-final
You know I would like to respond but there are not enough characters. I will make a new debate better suited for this site. I'll let you know when it's ready. I did view the link, though. Thanks.
Although a magician never reveals his tricks, you might be on to something!
Thank you for your comments and suggestions.
Start a debate and I will prove it there.
Spiderman is a movie. Torah is reality. Millions of Jews heard the Ten commandments in real life.
Nope. Only the Bible claims mass-witnesses. No other religion can be proven except for Judaism. Listen, if you want to debate this let me know and we can make a new debate.
You err in negating mass-witness testimony. All other religions rely on a single witness, but Judaism relies on millions of Jews witnessing an event in the desert.
Both the New Testament and Qur'an attest that what the Bible says is true, is true.
If having a few disputing sources to Caesar's existence is satisfactory enough for you, then how much more so is having millions of witnesses? We know Moses authored the Bible, too, among others. Two major world religions, both Christianity and Islam accept the Torah's account.
How do you know the sources that you accept at face value are true? You accept that Caesar existed, yet shouldn't you be questioning the source of that, too? Again, if Moses lied, the Jews would simply have rejected him. But he didn't and as a result, we have millions of witnesses. You cannot discount millions of witnesses. Is it reasonable to say every single one of them was also lying? That makes no sense to me.
No one saw G-d. “You cannot see my face, for man shall not see me and live.” Exodus 33:20. Again, millions of Jews witnessed the Sinai revelation. You would admit that George Washington, Caesar, Alexander the Great, and Columbus existed, even though you cannot ask anybody about them and even though you rely only on what the sources say about them. Yet you are convinced that Caesar existed, but be consistent, and assume Caesar never existed, too. Yet you will never make this claim because it is foolish. It is so with the Bible.
There is proof that Judaism is the correct religion. G-d revealed His Bible in front of mass-witnesses— to millions of Jews. The Sinai revelation occurred because millions of people saw it. If Moses came to the Israelites and lied that they experienced the revelation they would never accept him. The testimony of millions of Jews in the Bible proves the Exodus happened as described. What masses today claim the purported events as their history other than the Jews?
Since The Bible is a guaranteed source, what it says, whatever it says, must be true. Yes, many hands helped write/edit the Bible, but the vast majority of it was written by Moses. The irrefutable evidence of Genesis proves my point.
I think there were Jews in Egypt. The irrefutable evidence of Genesis proves this. But I don't think the Jews built the pyramids. Heck, I don't think the Egyptians built the pyramids for that matter.
To Con's point, yes, Egyptians did not have slaves, save the Jews. The Bible is clear.
I could argue that the Jews built the pyramids, but the Bible doesn't mention it. If they did, it would have said so.
That is very interesting and might prove my case. If they did it then, they could do it again.
Thanks for sharing the link.
I left the debate because there weren't enough characters. Therefore, I made a new debate about the same topic. You can view the new, current debate about the pyramids here: https://www.debateart.com/debates/2807-the-egyptians-did-not-build-the-pyramids-final
I'm glad you enjoy the debates.
Maybe. That's for you to figure out.
I created a new debate here: https://www.debateart.com/debates/2807-the-egyptians-did-not-build-the-pyramids-final
This time I added a thousand characters.
If you want to accept then I look forward to your rebuttal.
Take care.
You know I would like to respond but there are not enough characters. I will make a new debate better suited for this site. I'll let you know when it's ready. I did view the link, though. Thanks.
Ho, believe me. This is going to be a very interesting debate....
Looking forward to your rebuttal(s).