Life is created by God
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 9 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
To date, 35,000-70,000 plant species have been screened for their medicinal use. Plants especially those with ethnopharmacological uses have been the primary sources of medicine for early drug discovery. Fabricant and Farnsworth, (2001) reported that, 80% of 122 plant derived drugs were related to their original ethnopharmacological purposes.
the philosopher beholding now,as the prophet beheld formerly,that the almighty architect has literallyadjusted everything by weight and measured the waters meted out the heavens accurately comprehended the dust of the earth, "weighed he mountains in scales and the hills in a balance
It so happens our sun provides the perfect conditions. It’s not too small (i.e., too dim or too cool) or too big (producing unfortunate charbroiled results from simply being too hot). Compared to the intense and violent activity seen on other stars, our sun is remarkably even-tempered and well-mannered—it doesn’t flare or pulse like other stars. When solar flares do occur, they are not so violent as to vaporize our oceans…or worse
On the local level, our moon is equally amazing, leading two secular authors to ask, “Who built the Moon?” Knight and Butler state, “The Moon is 400 times smaller than the star at the center of our solar system, yet it is also just 1/400th of the distance between the Earth and the Sun.” Consequently, the moon and sun appear exactly the same size in Earth’s sky—making precise solar eclipses possible. The authors also say, “By some absolutely incomprehensible quirk of nature, the Moon also manages to precisely imitate the perceived annual movements of the Sun each month.
Consequently, the moon and sun appear exactly the same size in Earth’s sky—making precise solar eclipses possible
But even if our neighboring planets somehow formed quickly from accumulating space dust, recently discovered exoplanets (extrasolar planets) have changed secular solar system formation theory.
There are many factors that would make a star system too hostile for life to even get started, let alone survive for any period long enough to evolve. So what sort of star provides the perfect conditions for a habitable planet elsewhere in the universe?
create (simple past and past participle created)
[and]
(especially of a god) To bring into existence out of nothing, without the prior existence of the materials or elements used. [3]
P1: All plants are life
P2: Some plants are medicinal
C1: Therefore, God created life
P1: every toxic effect of any drug is the work of humans,
C1: Every drug is the work of humans
- No evidence is offered by PRO to establish medicine as of exclusively divine origin.
P1: Stellar objects are perfectly synchronized, aligned, and balanced
P2: The odds are infinitesimally small that a perfectly balanced solar system might form from nothing
C1: Therefore, God created the solar system (including, we are left to presume, life)
- Synchronized means “happening at the same time”
- Alignment has many meanings but context suggests objects forming in a line but PRO never identifies which stellar objects form in a line.
- Balance has many meanings but context suggest an equal distribution of weight on opposite sides of an axis but PRO never identifies that axis or which objects are alike in mass.
- The first is really no more than some philosophical musings by John Mason Good, a London apothecary who wrote magazine articles on medicine and religion. Good offers no particular insight regarding the solar system but expresses his amazement at the regularity of certain proportions in chemistry in poetic and theological terms. CON sets this evidence aside as irrelevant.[7]
- The second is an article entitled “The Perfect Balance of Our Solar System” which suggests in 2015 that identification of exoplanets prove that Sol’s system is uniquely well tempered for life. [8]
- The article quotes many actual scientists but none of those quotes actually connect back to Sherwin’s thesis.
- Sherwin never addresses the fairly obvious fact that astronomers are not yet able to characterize or catalog the solar systems of even nearby stars. While it was true before 2014 that many exoplanets identified were “hot Jupiters”- big gas giants rapidly orbiting their stars, that was because most exoplanet identification relied on detecting a planet’s gravitational effect on its star or by detecting changes in a star’s light as a planet transited between its star and Earth. Either way, big planets close in was what was detected because they create bigger wobbles in stars and occlude more of their stars light more often.
- Sherwin concluded he knew enough then about other star systems to discern Sol’s uniqueness but no scientist would pretend even four years later that we have yet defined or cataloged even one alien planetary system as yet much draw conclusions about “normal” systems vs ‘unique” systems.
- PRO quotes Sherwin concluding that our Sun is uniquely designed for life, ignoring the preponderance of evidence that life adapts to a fairly wide range of environments and no solar maximums or minimums have yet been established that might surpass life’s adaptability.
- PRO quotes Sherwin quoting some other authors, ““The Moon is 400 times smaller than the star at the center of our solar system, yet it is also just 1/400th of the distance between the Earth and the Sun.” Consequently, the moon and sun appear exactly the same size in Earth’s sky—making precise solar eclipses possible.”
Sherwin’s article is pretty obvious baloney that offers zero scientific insight regarding the “perfection” of solar systems.
P1: Stellar objects are perfectly synchronized, aligned, and balanced
P2: The odds are infinitesimally small that a perfectly balanced solar system might form from nothing
C1: Therefore, God created the solar system (including, we are left to presume, life)
And as staggering as it may seem, the circumference of the Moon is 27.322% that of the circumference of the Earth!
It takes 27.322 days for the Moon to fully orbit the Earth. That means that 366 orbits of the Moon around the Earth take an absolutely even 10,000 days!
The number 27.322, which we have just observed is the number of days it takes the Moon to orbit the Earth is highly significant, both singly and in its multiplies in the Earth, Moon, Sun relationship. For example, the Sun is exactly 109.288 times the size of the Earth - which is 4 X 27.322.
Even modern measuring systems were taken into account because the circumference of the Moon in kilometres is 10928.8 kilometres, which is 400 X 27.322. (And there is that '400' again, which you may recall is the number of times bigger the Sun is than the Moon.)
"The moon is not a natural satellite. It's orbit is by intelligent design. The moon itself is clearly an intelligent design. There are no coincidences, just opportunities for the smart to be seperated from the stupid. It totally eclipses the sun...I mean...HELLO. The odds of that happening are flipping STUPIDLY improbable. Add to the fact the moon takes 27.3 days to orbit Earth and just so happens to be 27.3% the comparitive size of the earth!! YES, THAT'S RIGHT. READ IT AGAIN MORONS. I mean...wake up. The earth has 365/366 days to orbit the sun and yet it is 366% larger than our moon! I MEAN.....WTF"
The Sun’s diameter @ 864,340 miles divided by the Moon’s diameter @ 2159 miles equals 400.34
The Sun’s avg. distance from Earth @ 92,960,000 miles divided by the Moon’s avg distance from Earth @ 238,855 equals 389.19 which is not only not a precise match it’s still off 2.5% after rounding.
Sherwin’s article is pretty obvious baloney that offers zero scientific insight regarding the “perfection” of solar systems.
the Moon is 1/400th the size of the Sun, and at 1/400th its distance, enables educational perfect eclipses
The Whopping Physics Coincidence: NewScientist reports about gravity and acceleration that, "a large chunk of modern physics is precariously balanced on a whopping coincidence" for, regarding gravitational and inertial mass, "these two masses are always numerically exactly the same. The consequences of this coincidence are profound..."
- there is the same number of electrons as protons to a standard deviation of one in ten to the thirty-seventh power, that is, 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (37 zeros)- the 1-to-1 electron to proton ratio throughout the universe yields our electrically neutral universe
“Thus, most stars located between spiral arms do not remain there for long, but would eventually be swept inside a spiral arm. Only at a certain precise distance from the galaxy's center, the "co-rotation radius," can a star remain in its place between two spiral arms, orbiting at precisely the same rate as the galaxy arms rotate around the core ( Mishurov, Y.N. and L. A. Zenina. 1999. Yes, the Sun is Located Near the Corotation Circle. Astronomy & Astrophysics 341: 81-85.). Why is it important that we are not in one of the spiral arms? First, our location gives us a view of the universe that is unobstructed by the debris and gases found in the spiral arms. “
turmeric's antioxidants have been found to reverse the effects of damage caused by pharmaceuticals, particularly in the treatment of schizophrenia. Commonly-prescribed antipsychotics often cause involuntary muscle movements and severe behavioral changes
CON interprets this resolution to mean that PRO intends to prove that some supernatural being brought some undefined set of organism(s) into existence without prior materials. CON’s job is to interrogate and disprove PRO’s evidence.RESOLUTION: Life is created by God
talking point 1
P1: All plants are lifeP2: Some plants are medicinalC1: Therefore, God created life
P1: The development of pharmaceuticals requires intelligenceP2: Some herbs found in nature have pharmaceutical qualitiesC1: Therefore God in intelligent
- Tumeric
- Apples
- Sweet
- Appendix
Now i do not believe that the apple is an intelligent life form.
We call are retarded people vegetables for Pete sake.
But i believe are Creator is intelligentI believe god designed the apples to feed the good bacteria and not the bad, etc.
P1: Stellar objects are perfectly synchronized, aligned, and balancedP2: The odds are infinitesimally small that a perfectly balanced solar system might form from nothingC1: Therefore, God created the solar system (including, we are left to presume, life)
"and john mason did not right an article he was a phylosopher who wrote a book in the 1800s"
And as staggering as it may seem, the circumference of the Moon is 27.322% that of the circumference of the Earth!It takes 27.322 days for the Moon to fully orbit the Earth. That means that 366 orbits of the Moon around the Earth take an absolutely even 10,000 days!
The number 27.322, which we have just observed is the number of days it takes the Moon to orbit the Earth is highly significant, both singly and in its multiplies in the Earth, Moon, Sun relationship. For example, the Sun is exactly 109.288 times the size of the Earth - which is 4 X 27.322.
Even modern measuring systems were taken into account because the circumference of the Moon in kilometres is 10928.8 kilometres, which is 400 X 27.322. (And there is that '400' again, which you may recall is the number of times bigger the Sun is than the Moon.)
- We should also note that PRO's own source material refutes PRO's resolution.
"Christopher Knight is an author who has written several books dealing with theories such as 366-degree geometry and the origins of Freemasonry. Knight appears in the two-part History Channel documentary Decoding the Past – "Mysteries of the Freemasons". In an interview about the book Who Built the Moon?: 2005 Knight stated that the moon is an artificial construction probably built by humans with a message in "base ten arithmetic so it looks as though it is directed to a ten digit species that is living on Earth right now - which seems to mean humans." He believes that it was created to make life on Earth possible, including humans, and that the most likely builders were humans of the future using time travel."
- PRO's next source, earthsky.org correctly reports the sun/moon ratios are only approximate, that the Moon's orbit is elliptical and slowly escaping Earth's gravity so these ratios are never precise, and that the odds of such a configuration are unknowable because we have so little data. PRO offers this source as more reliable than Wikipedia, so let's note that PRO's second argument is soundly refuted by PRO's own source.
- Likewise, PRO's next source credits aliens, not gods. PRO's consolation is "this still proves intelligent design," but PRO's burden is to prove God created life. Even if PRO successfully proved alien origins, PRO's resolution would nevertheless fail.
"taken from here. this is a .gov site so it is very reliable"https://kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
- kgov.com is NOT a .gov site. It is the website for America's most powerful Christian radio station, KLTT broadcasting (just down the road from CON's house in Denver, CO). This site is notoriously unreliable as a source of scientific information.
Gravitational and inertial mass are numerically exactly the same.
- the 1-to-1 electron to proton ratio throughout the universe yields our electrically neutral universe
stars rotate at the exact same rate as galaxy arms
The Moon's equatorial circumference is 10,921 km
Even modern measuring systems were taken into account because the circumference of the Moon in kilometres is 10928.8 kilometres
1000 feet x 360 x 365.24 = 131486400 feet = 40,077 km109.26 = 4 x 27.321109.2 x (11/3) = 400.44x 27,321 x Earth Circumference = Circumference of the Sun401 x Circumference of the Moon = Circumference of the Sun
(11/3) x Circumference of the Moon = Circumference of the Earth109.2 x (11/3) = 400.4 x Circumference of the Moon = Circumference of the Sun
The Moon, Earth and 273
Moon radius (equatorial) 1,738.1 km = 1080.0 milesEarth radius is 6,371 km (diameter 12,742 km = 7,917.5 miles)Moon/Earth Radius Ratio: 0.273 (0.27264)Moon Revolution period (days) 27.32
Moon radius (equatorial) 1,738.1 km = 1,080.0 miles,diameter: 3,476.2 km = 2,160.0 miles,circumference: 10,920.8 km = 6786 milesEarth radius (equatorial) 6,378.1 km = 3,963.168 miles,mean radius 6,371.0 km = 3,959 miles,diameter: 12,756.2 km = 7926 miles,circumference: 40,075 km = 24,901 milesSun radius (equatorial)Metric: 695,508 km, English: 432,168.6 milesDiameter: 1,391,016 km = 863,331 miles,By Comparison: 109.2 x that of EarthSun Equatorial CircumferenceMetric: 4,370,005.6 km, English: 2,715,395.6 milesBy Comparison: 109.2 x that of Earth
1,000 x 360 x 365.24 = 131,486,400131,486,400 feet = 40,077 km
Note: 273 x 11/3 = 1001 so the equation belowcould also give close approximation of Earth’s circumference:273 x (11/3) x 360 x 365 = 131,531,380[131,531,380 feet = 40,091 km ]
(11/3) x 27.321 x 4 x 100 = 40,071 km
1000 feet x 360 x 365.24 = 131486400 feet = 40,077 km109.26 = 4 x 27.321109.2 x (11/3) = 400.44x 27,321 x Earth Circumference = Circumference of the Sun401 x Circumference of the Moon = Circumference of the Sun
(11/3) x Circumference of the Moon = Circumference of the Earth109.2 x (11/3) = 400.4 x Circumference of the Moon = Circumference of the Sun
The Moon, Earth and 273
Close approximation of 27.3 is given by 2160/7920 = 3/11 = 0.272727
The Sun’s avg. distance from Earth @ 92,960,000 miles divided by the Moon’s avg distance from Earth @ 238,855 equals 389.19 which is not only not a precise match it’s still off 2.5% after rounding.
stars rotate at the exact same rate as galaxy arms
con saidThat is false. The Sun rotates the galactic center once every 225-250 Million years. The rotatational speed of the MIlky Way's spiral arms is estimated to be anywhere from 220-360 million years.
can a star remain in its place between two spiral arms, orbiting at precisely the same rate as the galaxy arms rotate around the core ( Mishurov, Y.N. and L. A. Zenina. 1999. Yes, the Sun is Located Near the Corotation Circle. Astronomy & Astrophysics 341: 81-85.). Why is it important that we are not in one of the spiral arms? First, our location gives us a view of the universe that is unobstructed by the debris and gases found in the spiral arms
- the 1-to-1 electron to proton ratio throughout the universe yields our electrically neutral universe
An approximately electrically neutral universe does suggest rough parity..... What evidence, experiments, theories does PRO offer that prove a perfect one to one ratio?
ssentially, PRO is saying that an object that weighs 1lb on Earth also weighs 1lb on a spaceship accelerating at 1g. This is not so much a coincidence as it is a way of describing the universe. Newton's third law
Galileo and Newton grappled with it, and ended up just accepting it,
PRO dropped this specific argument
negative effects of drugs is a function of dosage
P1: The development of pharmaceuticals requires intelligenceP2: Some herbs found in nature have pharmaceutical qualitiesC1: Therefore God in intelligent
Of course, this syllogism assumes that God created the nature where herbs are found
intelligence
The ability to acquire, understand, and use knowledge.
P1: Intelligent design is proof of God
P2: The medicinal properties of some plants demonstrate intelligent design
C1: Therefore, medicinal plants prove God
P1: Intelligent design is proof of God
P2: The perfect synchronicity of stellar objects demonstrate intelligent design
C1: Therefore stellar synchronicity proves God
"Most of the time [scientists] just find a plant with amazing health properties and make a synthetic version of it. There [sic] synthetic drug has a lot of side effects like changes in behavior and thinking' thoughts off suicide' and yellow eyes and skin etc and is not revolutionary and or life saving."
- For example, PRO quotes an herbal supplement vendor's claims that curcumin [turmeric] reverses the damage caused by pharmaceuticals but this is false.
"Although curcumin has been assessed in numerous laboratory and clinical studies, it has no medical uses established by well-designed clinical research. According to a 2017 review of over 120 studies, curcumin has not been successful in any clinical trial, leading the authors to conclude that "curcumin is an unstable, reactive, non-bioavailable compound and, therefore, a highly improbable lead"."
- Pro also claims that consumption of sweet flag roots can fix stuttering but this is likewise false.
"A. calamus and products derived from A. calamus (such as its oil) were banned from use as human food or as a food additive in 1968 by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Although calamus has been used for its fragrance and ingested, it has not been studied by rigorous clinical research. Individual medical reports of toxicity mention severe nausea and prolonged vomiting over many hours following oral uses."
- Pro also mentions apples and appendices but these examples are not relevant to medicinal plants. Neither of PRO's examples of are recognized as particularly medicinal by modern science.
"This is exactly what god did with the solar system. he literally adjusted it and measured it till everything was in the perfect spot with no flaws. the sun is in the perfect spot if it was closer or farther away we would either freeze to death or burn to death. god measured it out. "
"Measuring about a millimeter long, the tardigrade is a polyextremophile, which means its capable of surviving numerous harsh conditions. Sarah Bordenstein of the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole writes that they can withstand temperatures from -328 °F (200 °C) up to 304 °F (151 °C), lack of water and oxygen, “boiling alcohol,” (who thought of that?) and a thousand times the radiation we can take."
- Earthlings have not even determined whether life has ever developed on our two nearest solar system neighbors, Mars and Venus. PRO's claim that life can only develop within Earth's orbit is shown to be unlikely but also not provable until more planets are explored. PRO insists that it must be more than mere coincidence that the most perfect solar system for humans is also the only solar system any human has ever known but what is the value of ranking a data set containing only one single piece of data? Good statistical sampling practices recommend that for a galaxy of 400 billion solar systems, a sample size of about 385 solar systems would yield some estimates with 95% accuracy, give or take 5%- the base level from which estimates could made with some statistical confidence. CON recommends that we forego any effort to generalize regarding the relative habitability of solar systems until about 400 solar systems have been biologically surveyed.
- CON sets aside John Mason Good text as no more than a restatement of thesis.
- PRO also offered an opinion piece from the Institute for Creation Research that evaluates limited exoplanet research in 2015 and concludes that our solar system is radically different from what we are seeing elsewhere. CON pointed out that exoplanet discovery favors large gas giants, orbiting rapidly and that PRO's article was already obsolete at publication.
- PRO quoted Knight (Moon was built by time travelers) asserting that the solar system is perfectly designed because the Sun is both 400 times the size of the Moon and 400 times the distance from Earth as the Moon resulting in the perfect synchronicity of eclipses. CON countered that the Sun is only 389 times more than the Moon using median distances. PRO counters that his information comes from a .org site and .org sites are more reliable than Wikipedia, ignoring the fact that Wikipedia is the most popular .org site of all. In R3, PRO argues that 389 is still a very close number and that the perfect size match can be be ascertained visually during an eclipse. Of course, only about a quarter of eclipses are total and even those vary greatly by the degree of occlusion- refuting PRO again.
- In R2, PRO offered 273 as a significant number, associating the number of days (27.3) it takes the Moon to orbit the Earth to the ratio of the Moon's "size" to the Earth's. CON showed that if we get specific about size the numbers are not a perfect match. For example, dividing the Earth's equatorial circumference by the Moon's equatorial circumference we only get 27.2. In R3, PRO calls CON's counterargument bad math and questions CON's sources (all numbers from Wikipedia), but never shows the mathematical error, remains vague about what measurement is being compared to what measurement, and insists PRO sources are more reliable while only offering one new source- world mysteries blog. PRO also mixes up the Earth with the Moon a few times and uses both feet and kilometers in the same equation without converting the measurements. Since the burden is PRO's to demonstrate "perfect synchronicity" as evidence, PRO needs to demonstrate at least a few precise measurements that might reinforce PRO's claim. Instead, we are left with a muddle of scant, cherry-picked data taken from some manifestly non-rigorous websites.
- PRO's argument that stars rotate as the same rate as spiral arms remains unclear. In R3, PRO claims that stars rotational speeds match the orbital velocity of spiral arms but this is nowhere near true. Stars have highly variable rotational speeds and our Sol's rotational speed (nearly 2km/s) is 110 times slower than galactic orbit speed (220 km/s).
- In R3, PRO continued to assert without evidence that the number of electrons and protons in the universe are exactly the same. While electrical neutrality does imply parity, such an assumption is a long distance from establishing the perfectly matching numbers PRO is incapable of demonstrating.
- In R3, PRO continues to assert that gravitational mass and inertial mass are not identical and therefore it is a huge coincidence that both appear to be identical in every measurement ever. Burden remains on PRO to disprove the Theory of Relativity.
Gist:
Massive BoP failure based around non-sequiturs.
1. Medicine
Pro builds a case around some assertions about modern medicine (which doesn't predate life, so relevance?). Con counters in a few ways, explaining why it's a non-sequitur via putting it into logical form, and outright reminding us: “No evidence is offered by PRO to establish medicine as of exclusively divine origin.” All of these are wholly dropped by pro.
2. Space
Off topic to life...
Let's see, pro tries to use the moon (which has no living organisms) as proof of God creating life, but he fails to ever connect it to life, and con proves the numbers provided are false.
Pro insists all objects in space are synced, con explains that would mean moving at the same speed which is false.
Pro offers a big Gish Gallop of random numbers, but as con reminds us "None of PRO's coincidences demand a supernatural explanation."
---
Arguments: See above. Pro never even tried to touch on the topic of where life comes from.
Sources: "This is a fact just google search it and you will get this number." Telling the audience your evidence is they can do your research for you, will always be a pretty bad hit on this... Pro denies being able to find "wear" con got his bad numbers, when the links were presented right over the numbers themselves, as con later explains (not that it was needed). Generally pro offers a bunch of off topic random sites, whereas con offers useful verifiable information... Big thing was con catching pro's own source disagreeing with pro, "...reports the sun/moon ratios are only approximate, that the Moon's orbit is elliptical and slowly escaping Earth's gravity so these ratios are never precise, and that the odds of such a configuration are unknowable because we have so little data. PRO offers this source as more reliable than Wikipedia, so let's note that PRO's second argument is soundly refuted by PRO's own source."
S&G: Pro intentionally obfuscates his points behind a wall of illegibility. Extra lines enters in the
middle of
sentences, extra spaces at random, missing punctuation, and as an example this gem: "on the site it link is from Einstein and Nutan. it is still a huge coincidence. newton discovered that god fined tuned the notion of gravity. nutan did not discover how this came to be like con seems to be saying. he discovered that this is the way it is" [sic]
Pro appears mainly to throw out an unending series of numbers and then assert that these numbers prove God exist.
Pro has to justify exactly why these numbers support the contention of God with an argument and justification as to why these numbers show God exists; if appears as if con does a far better job of crystallizing pros argument here than pro does.
Pro really covers two main points; that medicine is in food, and that numbers assoctied with celestial bodies are special.
For the first, con points out that this is a non sequitor, that plants being medicinal doesn’t automatically shown God; for the second con outlines pros failure to show the universe is actually synchronized, pointing out multiple ways in which the universe does not appear synchronized; con also points pros sources own failure to recognize the insufficient sample size of exoplanets - assuming what can be measured now is all that can be measured.
Pro continues not by actually addressing any of the points con raised, but by simply throwing out more numbers, all of which seem to suffer the same issues con pointed out in R1.
Con added some smaller points: that to be medicinal - plants must be dosed properly, which is not done by God.
Con also points out that pro is wandering off topic.
Con continues to disprove the numbers, showing the perfection of the numbers are not neatly as strong as pro claims, with human rounding; and asking why these numbers are actually divinely significant in the first place. There are many individually flawed numbers that con effectively refuted in R1, by pointing out lack of clear warrant.
The final round follows the same pattern.
Arguments: quite frankly, pro doesn’t warrant any of his arguments and fails to meet his burden by failing to show exactly why parameters of Stellar objects, or plants having positive effects are primarily indicative only of an omnipotent super being.
Con does well to go throw each and every point, but fundamentally did his job in R1; my RfD could have been 10 times as long had I detailed each one of pros individual claism here. Arguments to con.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ragnar // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to con for arguments
>Reason for Decision: See below
>Reason for Mod Action:To award argument points, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision. There simply isn't enough discussion of the arguments to allow this vote to stand.
************************************************************************
Gist:
Massive BoP failure.
Plus I could have sworn I already voted on this... Pro,y ou need new debates or at least new points, if something wasn't convincing anyone the last dozen times, maybe try something else.
1. Medicine
In short: “No evidence is offered by PRO to establish medicine as of exclusively divine origin.”
2. Space
Off topic to life... Plus they are indeed moving at different speeds rather than being all perfectly synced.
alright cool
Hi crossed.
remind me to never borrow a toothbrush from you.
oral means "by mouth, related to the mouth" An oral hygienist cleans your teeth. An oral exam in school should always be a verbal exam. Oral sex is a blow job.etc.
Yes, the US Food & Drug Administration lists sweet flag as unpalatable by humans, a poison and carcinogenic. Ingestion pretty consistently causes humans to vomit. It is not used as a cure for stuttering and should not be used as a cure for stuttering unless death is viewed as an acceptable alternative.
"A. calamus and products derived from A. calamus (such as its oil) were banned from use as human food or as a food additive in 1968 by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Although calamus has been used for its fragrance and ingested, it has not been studied by rigorous clinical research. Individual medical reports of toxicity mention severe nausea and prolonged vomiting over many hours following oral uses.
Oral uses???
why were they putting it in people butts. it says that people have used if for eating purposes but nothing happened
"though calamus has been used for its fragrance and ingested, it has not been studied by rigorous clinical research"
but then they decided to banned it because they shoved it up people butts
"individual medical reports of toxicity mention severe nausea and prolonged vomiting over many hours following oral uses."
So they got a perfectly normal plant banned because some scientist found it dangerous to put sweet flag in people butts. Butt they did not test it if ingested And it even says that how people use it medicaly. Who was the Einstein who decided to test a plant effects when
shoved up your butt. but not when consumed like how everyone eats it.
Thats like how big pharma patents kratom for its medical use and then banned the plant so people can not get the real stuff.
so the word 400 is now connected to God, well think about it, Moses was in the desert for how long!, 40 years, from the beginning of Adam and eve to Jesus was 4000 years, imagine God's greater glory!
i think Pokemon sun and moon references how the sun and moon are 400 away from each other and 400 times bigger
because they added 400 Pokemon
Well, The Pokémon Company has announced that more than 400 Pokémon can be discovered across the Alola region in Pokémon Ultra Sun and Pokémon Ultra Moon
https://www.nintendo-insider.com/how-many-pokemon-are-there-in-pokemon-ultra-sun-and-ultra-moon/
where did you get your sun and moon sizes.
because i can not find it.
i tried finding the info on my own but everything i found repeats what i have said.
https://earthsky.org/space/coincidence-that-sun-and-moon-seem-same-size
this is a .org site and it is not christian
it is saying a bunch of astronomers hold this as fact to
At this particular moment in Earth’s history – although the sun’s diameter is about 400 times larger than that of the moon – the sun is also about 400 times farther away. So the sun and moon appear nearly the same size as seen from Earth. And that’s why we on Earth can sometimes witness that most amazing of spectacles, a total eclipse of the sun.
EarthSky asked Myles Standish about the similarity in the size of Earth’s moon and sun, as seen from Earth. He is a mathematical astronomer and a former professor at Yale University. He worked for CalTech’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. He has published over 300 articles, mostly in the field of solar system dynamics and celestial mechanics. He said this similarity is unique among the planets and moons that make up our local family in space, our solar system. In other words, it doesn’t occur with any other planets and moons in our immediate neighborhood of space.