Jeffrey Epstein is still alive
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Pros argument is completely unwarranted; and as explained was a non sequitor. Even if I accept as true each of the facts that pro brought - they would not mean that Epstein is Alive.
Pro needs to do far more than he did; to present even basic evidence that the suicide was indeed fake, and that the best explanation of the available evidence was that he wasn’t killed at all, and is actually alive. Pro catastrophically fails to do this.
A non-sequitur instead of a case. Pro never once offers evidence to even imply of the guy being alive, he merely points to the death being suspicious. Con points this out, thus wins.
S and G- tie
Conduct-Pro wins because his opponent forfeited round 1. 1 point Pro.
Sources-tie
Arguments- I am to believe the BOP is on Pro as Con stated. Pro gave many arguments that don't necessarily assist his point, his 24 hour surveillance point, or the staged suicide point, Pro doesn't meet the BOP, all he proves is that the cameras footage was lost and that they may have staged a suicide, Pro fails to show how these things prove Epstein is alive, as well as there being . Con convinced me entirely through his rebuttals of these points and how they don't prove pro's point at all. both of these points were won by Con
There is also the fake photos point. I, like the other two points I think Con edged this one, he proved how if they were fake, mistakes we've seen wouldn't have been there as it would be too obvious. This, with the other two points make me believe Con won, with the Bop on Pro, he would have to make solid offensive arguments, Con mitigated all of these with better defensive arguments. Con wins Arguments, 3 points to Con
Con wins 3-1.
Pro didn't do bad in this debate, he just failed to meet the BOP.
Again just conjecture no hard fact
finally a conspiracy theory worth a debate, i suspected this myself but face it there is zero evidence
A few facts.
People who associated with epstein include, clinton, trump, a british royal, many other powerful and wealthy people.
Some claim bill clinton is guilty of murder because he associated with them, wouldnt that mean all of the people who associated with him are equally guilty?
Claiming it must be the person you disagree with politically, even tho multiple suspects have the same connection is the most pathetic example of being a partisan hack.
https://youtu.be/oVnuFY20st0?t=40
Absolutely
So dam shady.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_VpaUGdy7U
I like AMTV, good source, here's one from infowars that had to move because of censorship
Yup, how conveinatn, Clinton!,admit it
They were not they say they lost the footage. How convenient
https://youtu.be/5_CJX5Wfm18
Why were the cameras malfuntioning the night of the suicide?
I know how many times did bill Clinton ride on his plane 27 times to his private island nicknamed orgy island. He was under 24 hours suicide watch. They conveniently lost the footage of him killing himself. I was bouncing between the Clinton killing him and him being on vacation on an island. i concluded that it i more likely that he is on another island given that the autopsy examiner was the same person who did president jfk martin Luther king and OJ Simpson wife death cases and like ten other of the most shady murders ever. If they faking the autopsy then he must be alive
But it is entirely possible that he committed suicide by shooting himself 15 times in the back of the head.
Clinton raped women and kills people
Clinton murdered him, get it right