Instigator / Pro
3
1294
rating
75
debates
18.0%
won
Topic

Socialism

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
6
Sources points
0
4
Spelling and grammar points
2
2
Conduct points
1
2

With 2 votes and 11 points ahead, the winner is ...

Trent0405
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Politics
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
100
Required rating
5
Contender / Con
14
1707
rating
32
debates
84.38%
won
Description
~ 537 / 5,000

Karl Marx was wrong about more stuff than he got right, I never liked him he looked smelly and dirty and he was a lazy malcontent.Do you know who I did like his successor Eduard Bernstein who saw a peaceful evolutionary democratic path through gradual reform . But Socialism is inevitable for reasons they ignored , we simply cant survive unless we heavily regulate our conduct, greed and inequality are killing the planet. And if we have to slow economic growth to the pace of a snail , so what? all the better, rapid growth is reckless

Added:
--> @Club

As RM said, 2/5 isn't half and thus your vote cannot stand. It is removed

Added:

Note for my RFD I said R3 meaning R4

Added:
--> @Club

2/5 isn't half.

Added:
Contender
--> @billbatard

oops missed your sources, can you clarify what you mean

Added:
Instigator

First of all that figure 100 million totally made up https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/7n6ql2/is_the_black_book_of_communism_an_accurate_source/ 

Added:
Instigator

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/multimedia-article/podcast-economic-growth-environment/  in our efforts to save the earth we must radically change our conduct and values