All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 2 votes and 11 points ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- One day
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
- Required rating
Karl Marx was wrong about more stuff than he got right, I never liked him he looked smelly and dirty and he was a lazy malcontent.Do you know who I did like his successor Eduard Bernstein who saw a peaceful evolutionary democratic path through gradual reform . But Socialism is inevitable for reasons they ignored , we simply cant survive unless we heavily regulate our conduct, greed and inequality are killing the planet. And if we have to slow economic growth to the pace of a snail , so what? all the better, rapid growth is reckless
As RM said, 2/5 isn't half and thus your vote cannot stand. It is removed
Note for my RFD I said R3 meaning R4
2/5 isn't half.
oops missed your sources, can you clarify what you mean
First of all that figure 100 million totally made up https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/7n6ql2/is_the_black_book_of_communism_an_accurate_source/
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/multimedia-article/podcast-economic-growth-environment/ in our efforts to save the earth we must radically change our conduct and values