Instigator / Con
6
1377
rating
62
debates
25.81%
won
Topic
#1472

Antarctica aliens

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
9
Better sources
2
6
Better legibility
1
3
Better conduct
3
3

After 3 votes and with 15 points ahead, the winner is...

oromagi
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
21
1922
rating
117
debates
97.44%
won
Description

Your profile says you live in Antarctica and you have an alien profile pic. With the alien in Antarctica being pushed by mainstream media this is very weird .

The new York post wrote this.
https://nypost.com/2017/12/11/discovery-in-antarctica-changes-everything-we-know-about-aliens/

similar Antarctica aliens article
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/618769/Antarctic-UFO-mystery-deepens-after-researchers-find-tanks-guarding-alien-crash-site

Why are so any mainstream outlets saying there could be aliens in Antarctica. What is going on.

In ancient books like the book of Enoch that are not cannon.
It says god chained a bunch of demons in a frozen desert. and they would be released in the last day.
https://youtu.be/Bez4DKZI7yU

Right. Don't you know that the U.S. government discovered an Ancient chair that fires space torpedoes out of Antarctica?

shout out to anyone who gets the reference.

I tried to nail it down a couple of times but never really did. I started out working against CON's claim: ""Many conspiracy theorist believe that our politicians are lizard People. The real answer is not aliens but demons." It is not until R3 that CON makes it clear that he claims that Kerry consorts with demons, but is not himself a demon. The title is about aliens but CON had no actual claims regarding aliens. Mostly it just feels like PRO wanted to keep tossing out new outrageous and unsupportable claims and only lightly engaged or countered any rebuttal.

-->
@oromagi
@crossed

Before I try to read this, would one (or both) of you clarify the resolution? Like is pro arguing they exist and con that they don't, or is pro arguing morally in favor of said demons and con arguing morally against them...

this debate!

You both keep referring to con as pro and vice versa...