Can America's White Domestic Terrorists Ever Clear Their Violent Image?

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: oromagi // Mod action: [Not Removed]

>Points Awarded: 7 points to Pro

>Reason for Decision: "Truly contemptible conduct by CON here. PRO sets up a skeletal premise for the seeming purpose of racist invective. PRO then assumes CON is a member of the racial group based on debate acceptance and addresses CON as a target for mere hate speech. Full points to PRO for responding with love. User mairj23 should be advised that while racism is well-tolerated on this site, attacks on fellow members are not. If such conduct continues this debater would advocate a corrective boot to ass."

>Reason for Mod Action: This is a troll debate per the definition provided in the Moderation Extended Policies and Interpretations. Article 3 sub-section 3 designates three categories of troll debates. One of these categories reads:
"Debate primarily designed to be humorous or facetious or containing primarily humorous or facetious content."
While not humorous, it is axiomatically true that the debate is facetious in nature. Additionally, the topic is designed to incite and annoy. It, purely and simply, is a troll debate. Thus, it is not moderated.
************************************************************************

Honestly, I don't have a clue how you became a moderator.

I agree 100%...When someone can't handle the truth or gets exposed, vote bombing will take place.

I've literally embarrassed the so-called "best-of-the-best" debaters and vote bombing began as soon as the debates were over.
I take it as a badge of honor.

As I've stated earlier, this topic has been all over the news and I've listed numerous sources. I've noticed that it's considered a "troll debate" when a certain demographic gets exposed. Yes, fornication with goats but don't forget about the white supremacy tattoos also.

Of course, the mainstream news has stopped reporting on it because this is a white-run society that's trying to protect a white woman who just so happens to be a congresswoman.

Note that I consider this a troll debate, and still voted based on debate content. I have long disliked that comedic debates are outright non-moderated. However, that they are non-moderated is the current standard; a standard you knew both when you accepted the debate with that facetious description, and ended it with a cheeky declaration of love.

If this is a troll debate, you will be okay with everyone votebombing against me then? Just stop that bullshit.

If this was not a troll debate, please provide a link to any respectable news site verifying the "fornication with goats" mentioned in the description.

...

Admittedly, I am still new to the whole modding thing here. I meant to call this a troll debate in my vote as a matter of my opinion as a voter; not make any official proclamation.

This is not a troll debate.

If you have a problem with this label, then you'll need to speak to the Justice Department.

1350

YOU ARE NOW A WHITE DOMESTIC TERRORIST!!!
-mairj23

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: PressF4Respect // Mod action: [Not Removed]
>Points Awarded: 7 points awarded to Pro
>Reason for Decision: "If a debate is publicly designated as a troll debate, or if both sides present arguments that are done for the sake of trolling, then the debate is not moderated."
-DART COC
>Reason for Mod Action: Troll debates are not moderated per the CoC and Voting Guidelines. As this was already designated a troll debate by another moderator, and seeing no reason to counter that decision, this vote ought not be removed.
************************************************************************

You've demonized yourself by your actions.

Who isn't a terrorist? Black Americans, Asian Americans Hispanic Americans

You are not just talking about current events in usa, because you referenced historic violence going back to europe. Your topic tries to demonize white people in general.

My question remains. If a few terrorist examples can label a whole race or ethnicity as terrorists, who isnt a terrorist?

If what I'm saying is hearsay, lies or propaganda, then why are some states trying to pass legislation about this topic?

I'm just stating and debating current events. Nothing more, nothing less.

This discussion is about US terrorism, not other areas of the globe.

Are you aware of why the Justice Dept. labelled white people as domestic terrorists? If not, then wouldn't 3 consecutive mass murders within 1 month by the same ethic group be considered terrorism?

As you can see, you have no argument what-so-ever.

Let me see if i understand you.
Because a group of white people were labeled (by mostly other white people) to be one of many terrorist groups, therefore white people in general are terrorists?

But terrorist groups exist in all parts of the world, therefore arent all people terrorists?

And if your statement about white people is true for all people... what's the point?

Unfortunately your research is hearsay, and you refuse to provide evidence, as evident by your exchange with pressF4.

You are confident in your "research" about the same as your flat earther, holocaust denier, or any other conspiracy theory under the sun. Perhaps one day you will open your eyes, til then your hopeless.

Yes I'm right and I'm very confident because I've done the research long before creating this debate.

I've posted authentic links and this subject has been displayed all over the news. No matter what the scoreboard says; I'm coming out the victor either way.

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: AntonZenz123 // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: Better arguments to Pro; Better sources to Pro; Better spelling and grammar to Pro; Better conduct to Pro.
>Reason for Decision: See below
">Reason for Mod Action: The voter acted in such a way to suggest they did not give fair weighting to the debate content.
Voting from slave accounts is prohibited (be it the same user, or any other which cannot be readily told apart).
"
**************************************************

AntonZenz123
51 minutes ago
Criterion Con Tie Pro Points
Better arguments ✗ ✗ ✔ 3 points
Better sources ✗ ✗ ✔ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✗ ✗ ✔ 1 point
Better conduct ✗ ✗ ✔ 1 point
Reason:
it is the height of hypocrisy to say a whole race is racist, thats racist isnt it? so you lose

compared to what? look at the coloured monkeys they do worse and they arent even smart like whites are

Speaking of learning how to take an L, you should take your own advise. Your so convinced you are correct before the debate even starts you dont realize how you fail to support your claims.

I asked you a simple question, to which you still haven't answered. Unless and until you do so, by providing sources to your claim, my point (any claim presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence [Hitchens' Razor]) still stands.

Dude, at least have some dignity with your concession.

You're not the first person to take an "L" and you certainly won't be the last.