Instigator / Pro
9
1466
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic

Abiogenesis

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
12
Sources points
4
8
Spelling and grammar points
1
4
Conduct points
1
4

With 4 votes and 19 points ahead, the winner is ...

GeneralGrant
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two weeks
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
20,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
28
1395
rating
22
debates
20.45%
won
Description
~ 50 / 5,000

Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence.

Added:
--> @GeneralGrant

You need to submit at least one point to make your case, or this debate will be an FF on both sides. It really doesn't matter what argument you use. Just write something so we can give you argument points.

Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin

oh yeah, I had almost forgotten about good ol' backwardseden. I guess I just blocked out all of the times I got called a "pus filled dung bile cotton faced teeny bopper."

Added:

not by real science no no

Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet

Nah that was justbackwardseden

Added:
Instigator
--> @Dr.Franklin

Likewise...

Also the fact that you made "supposed" enemy's on debate.org probably had something to do with your clearly inappropriate and vulgar behavior/language towards others on the site.

Added:

another one from DDO

**sigh**

Added:
Instigator

--> @OoDart

Is creation from a supreme being of some sort supported by empirical evidence? No, so no it doesn't count.

--> @zedivictor4

It was more of an opening rather then an actual argument, so i wouldn't judge yet based off that alone.

Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet

Does creation from a Supreme Being of some sort count as abiogenesis?

Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet

"Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence."

Well. That's a self supporting truism in a nutshell if ever I saw one.

It's like saying, frying pans are possible and supported by evidence.

Not a great deal of science required.