life during war time is the most hard core song ever written
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 16 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XskIem_iFCE this aint no party this aint no disco this ain't no foolin around
if you like a song its a good song there is no such thing as an obejctively good or bad sound
The song is included in The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame's 500 Songs that Shaped Rock and Roll.[3]" wikipedia
but thats just me right, there are no right and wrong answers in music
I said song, what you presented as an alternative, wasn't a song that wasn't a song it was an attack on my auditory nerves it wasn't even noise it was a toilet flushing in hell, i was talking about art something that required talent and genius to create, not a demonic bowel movment
you say tomatoes i say tomatoesi think the problem is we both agree to some degree that taste in music is subjective
Pro presented the claim that one song was the most "hardcore" out of all of them. He follows this up by saying that taste in music is subjective, which undermines the entire claim. Con notes this by presenting a counter-example which at least one person (Con) finds to be more hardcore than the one Pro presented. This is perfectly valid, since both sides agree that musical tastes are subjective.
Conduct is for Pro's forfeit in the final round.
PRO was pretty clear that his argument was entirely subjective, which makes resolution untestable, unprovable. PRO fails to define hardcore or even explain why his song met any standard by that name. CON defines and shows at least that PRO's idea of hardcore is pretty mild by many music conventions which grabs him the win. Conduct for single forfeit.
I honestly prefer pro's offering, but under the definition we have for hardcore pro basically conceded. "An attack on my auditory nerves" that somehow "wasn't even noise" sounds way more extreme (amazingly both soundless and harming the eardrums!); plus it is reviewed as being "a toilet flushing in hell ... a demonic bowel movment."
Conduct for forfeiture.
Conduct to Con-Pr Forfeited R3.
-----------------------------------------------------
Pro provides practically no evidence to support the notion that life during war time is the most hard core song ever written. The only thing he offers is the length off the name, which doesn't seem to prove it's really hardcore. Pro even concedes that there are no right or wrong answers. Con then lists a song that better fits the definition of hardcore, Pro never touches this new song.
Pro never meets his BOP, he just gives some fun facts about the song in question. Con presents a song that is more hardcore if we go by the definition of hardcore that was presented by Con and never refuted by Pro.
well this must be the place ;)
if you never saw this watch this its the best concert ever better than a stones concert even https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bjnRrvx88Y
my point jeffry is that my opinion that is is the greatest IS SUBjECTIVE ok?
Zombie by The Cranberries is more hard core, as is Sunday Blood Sunday by U2.
"With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? " -RW Emerson
Stop Making Sense was the single greatest concert of my life- third row at Red Rocks, late summer under the stars. General admission so we sat in line 3 days and 2 nights for those seats. When Jonathan Demme's film came out it played at the Esquire every Friday at midnight for years. My friends & I would shrug on our absurdly oversized sports coats and get all hopped up on black coffee and eggrolls dipped in almost murder spicy mustard at the Park Lane Cafe and go dance to that same handful of songs over and over and over again. God damn but I do love the Talking Heads.
It seems like this debate contradicts itself. How can something be the greatest while at the same time the author, in the description, admits no piece of music is objectively better than another?
YOU
Who would have thought the right deals with purity tests?
not everything needs to be a debate