Instigator / Con
14
1536
rating
19
debates
55.26%
won
Topic
#2015

Ethics of cloning and genetic engineering in humans

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
0
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...

nmvarco
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
8
1702
rating
77
debates
70.13%
won
Description

1st round: Con waives, Pro presents opening arguments
2nd round: Con presents opening arguments, Pro presents rebuttals and any new arguments
3rd round: Con presents rebuttals and any new arguments, Pro presents rebuttals, no new arguments
4th round: Con presents rebuttals, no new arguments, Pro waives

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Not an easy decision. Let me know if you have trouble accessing the RFD.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y0NfTGWDYrw4n2F4XHjmrpC9wCzZ4QtFhFpk4-l6cJU/edit?usp=sharing

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Close debate folks. I give the RFD here:

https://shrib.com/#nmvarco%20v.%20fauxlaw%20Genetic%20Engineering%20and%20Human%20Cloning

If it doesn't work, let me know.