Instigator / Pro
3
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic

This Debate is Stupid

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Voting points
3
9

With 11 votes and 6 points ahead, the winner is ...

User_2006
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Miscellaneous
Time for argument
Two weeks
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
1,000
Contender / Con
9
1470
rating
50
debates
40.0%
won
Description
~ 148 / 5,000

stupid: duke pasur ose treguar një mungesë të madhe inteligjence ose sens të përbashkët.

rules: يجب أن تكون كل جملة حجة بلغة مختلفة غير الإنجليزية.

Round 1
Pro
hierdie debat is dom omdat dit nie 'n gesonde verstand het nie. 

asnjë nga fjalitë nuk mund të jetë në anglisht. 

በተጨማሪም ፣ ይህ ክርክር ከዚህ በፊት ተከናውኗል እናም ምንም እንዳልተማርሁ በመግለጽ ጠፍቼ ነበር ፡፡

هذا النقاش لا يزال جولة واحدة وما زلت لا أستطيع دحض حجج منافسي.

այս բանավեճը նույնպես երկու շաբաթ տևում է փաստարկների համար, ինչը թույլ է տալիս ինձ փախցնել աբսուրդ ժամանակի պահից առաջ:

68 65 72 65 2c 20 49 20 75 73 65 20 68 65 78 2c 20 77 68 69 63 68 20 69 73 20 68 6f 72 72 69 62 6c 65 20 61 6e 64 20 65 78 74 72 65 6d 65 6c 79 20 65 73 6f 74 65 72 69 63 2e 20

ausazko ikuslearentzat, spam ari naizela eta arauak urratzen ari direla ematen du.

sigurno se slažete, dobivanje zabrane bila bi najveća glupost

并且您必须检查每个句子以查看其中是否包含任何重要信息。

i když tento není o ničem. Vidste du, at Jorden er flad? Sillä ei selvästikään ole merkitystä ja tuhoa. Svo ekki sé minnst á hreina fáviti.

ahiu, poiu abnk ush oowem coun lo pooula we thiho. 

-- לאָזן מיר צעלאָזן איר, דאָס איז געווען ומזין.

私はケースを休ませる
Con
First, as per my last debate, instigating and accepting a debate demonstrate intelligence as anyone who does that have some sort of intelligence. Keep in mind that dogs are among the smartest non-human animals on earth, and dogs can't comprehend your debates, even if it is just 2-sentence paragraphs.

Conclusion: This debate, in itself, is not stupid.

Since I only have 1000 characters, I will simply state my opponent's view: This debate is stupid because no one can understand it and learn anything. The argument time is too long, nonsensical garbage, etc. However, because he used different languages that no one would want to understand, it would mean:
1. It requires intelligence to translate into languages
2. The expression with numbers means that goes through coding and it requires technological intelligence
3. My words certainly make sense, meaning that there are some levels of intelligence
4. My opponent made an argument that clearly helps him, which means he is smart in some way

I am done...