Instigator / Pro
49
1470
rating
50
debates
40.0%
won
Topic
#2083

Pineapple on pizza should be allowed

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
21
0
Better sources
14
6
Better legibility
7
5
Better conduct
7
0

After 7 votes and with 38 points ahead, the winner is...

User_2006
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
9,090
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
11
1440
rating
6
debates
0.0%
won
Description

Definition provided. I have learned from my loss with Pense.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pizza
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pineapple

-->
@Barney

I don't even have the power to delete comments but I just thought I'd take care of that one LOL

-->
@Barney

**************************************************
>Reported Comment: Ragnar // Mod action: Not Removed
>Reason for Mod Action:
The reported comment contained no reportable content.
**************************************************

I am finally winning something.

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: oromagi // Mod action: Not Removed (borderline)
>Points Awarded: 7:0; All points to Pro.
>Reason for Decision: See Votes Tab.
>Reason for Mod Action:
The vote was borderline. By default, borderline votes are ruled to be sufficient.
**************************************************

I am finally winning something

-->
@Trent0405

When the topic is very evident, I use your style, which is short description+Source.

cool to see I influenced someones argument style. LoL

-->
@oromagi

Damn, you just roasted a banned debater.

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Crocodile // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 7:0; All points to Pro.
>Reason for Decision: See Comments Tab.
>Reason for Mod Action:
I'm very lax on certain things just being implied (such as the non-forfeiting side not forfeiting... hence why I want to change the voting rules), but it needs to be said: Advertising your debate is fine, but it in itself cannot be the reason for your allotment, even on an FF.
**************************************************

Crocodile
13 hours ago
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:
https://www.debateart.com/debates/2093/is-erict-a-sh-tbag

*Is tHiS NoOb tRapPIng??? "??:?!??!*

-->
@User_2006
@EricT

https://images3.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED382/5c0383f5d5257.jpeg

-->
@Crocodile

fuck you you bitch

-->
@EricT

I fucking love your argument. Except the fact that you're a shitbag

EricT sure is very ambitious.

-->
@User_2006

I see no reason to disallow 🍍 on 🍕

-->
@Jeff_Goldblum

No, it is meant to be mentally and rhetorically allowed. I am trying to make people believe it is okay to put pineapple on pizza. That aside. I predict RM will accept this but I'd hate to see such a great debater to debate me 4 times in a row and winning them.

-->
@User_2006

"Allowed" as in legally permitted?