Instigator / Con
3
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#2186

God and Santa

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
0
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
1
2

After 2 votes and with 11 points ahead, the winner is...

oromagi
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
14
1922
rating
117
debates
97.44%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Please demonstrate how the two concepts are the same.
Believing in Santa Claus is likened to the belief in God.
How so?
For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.

-->
@RationalMadman

Yes, indeed I did misrepresent Pro and Con. It's just that over 90% of debates, Pro is the instigator, and I do, at times, succumb to convention. Just more games by the true Con; games that are no favors to the reversal of roles to the instigator. To oromagi, my apologies. To R-adman, my tyhanks, although thehungry dog reference is, in fact a correct analogy.

-->
@fauxlaw

When you realise which side is Pro and which side is Con, the arrogant and insulting tone you typed that with must taste bitter, 'hungry dog'.

-->
@Mall
@oromagi

An r1 total failure by Pro, a duplicate mistake of another debate vote I've just offered. Caution to Pro to cease this nonsense. It does not help your cause. And your total lack of sourcing does not help you, either. Do some research and prove your points by scholarship greater than your own. Neither does the description's first paragraph; a load of obvious drivel unnecessary to explain. By contrast, a relentless r1 success by Con. I look forward to the remaining rounds like a hungry dog in the face of a next meal.