Instigator / Pro
19
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic
#2233

Pro is able to have his arguments describe his own arguments

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
9
0
Better sources
6
6
Better legibility
3
3
Better conduct
1
3

After 3 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

seldiora
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
12
1731
rating
167
debates
73.05%
won
Description

just for fun.

In order for pro to win, he must sufficiently describe his arguments (including the idea of describing the description)

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession.

There's actually some fairly cool stuff you can do with this type of programming.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession. I applaud both Pro and Con for being able to create, think through, and analyze such mind-numbing madness. Once I was able to unravel the logic in my head, it was quite entertaining to read. It was really easy to see how Pro's experience in programming helped him in this debate.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

降伏
降伏
降伏
降伏