Reverse Rap Battle: Supadudz (represented by RM) and RM (represented by Supadudz)
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 5 votes and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
RM represents Supdudz and Supadudz represents RM.
These debates are extremely difficult to judge. I preferred pro to con’s rap. I am going to analyze the debate more in the comment section when I get a chance. Good job to both of you. It was very close.
Full disclosure; I was asked to vote on this debate, but my vote will be fair.
Rap isn't my area of expertise, so this is a tough one for me to judge. As far as I can tell both sides made excellent and well-crafted "arguments" for their respective sides.
One area where I did see a clear difference was sources. Both sides provided a source for the "beat" of their argument, however Pro went above and beyond by also inserting links to specific "topics" that were referenced in his "argument." For example, when accusing [his opponent/himself] of being a flat-earther, he provides a link to the forum topic where flat-earth theory was discussed. When using "angry-looking goose" as an insult, he links to a photo of the same. This added a lot of clarification to what these references were supposed to mean and how they applied to the subject being "debated" in this case. If I could give "style" points for this, I would, but awarding points for sources seems to be the best option within the voting system.
So freaking close. I've read it with the music open in another tab so many times, and at the end of the day, I was pretty satisfied from the efforts of both contestants. By a slim margin I will give my vote to SupaDudz.
I have to say “You think this beaks for squawking, you're the one typing here all day, like a wannabe rebirth of a debate-oriented Stephen Hawking,
You're a faulty-spermed worm whos 'snake's as dysfunctional as himself, filthy vermin,” won it for me.
RM was in my view a bit more creative, in both insults and scanning style.
You both should take a bow on this one as far as I'm concerned. That shit was awesome, boys. Lmao.
All points awarded evenly to both Pro and Con for their mad skills at turning self-insult into poetry.
not bed, bet
yes it is all ok until we lose.
Ill get this out tomorrow if that is ok, I am busy af right now
Im aware but do you spell a lot of words wrong on purpose?
convoluted=extremely complex and difficult to follow.
tired not tied*
lmao
Oh man this debate idea is genius and your R1 was genius.
too confused to say a thing*
monofucker is correct pun, not meant to be motherfucker.
but i aint one to gloat* not one gloat.
So it is basically a roast ourself challenge that I am dissing myself? I like that
We are dissing ourselves and bigging up the other by becoming the other somewhat
So I am kinda lost but ok