Removal Of Welfare Checks
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 7 votes and with 26 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
RULES OF THE ROAD
----------------------------
1. No DA, T, or Kritiks
2. Grammar should only be taken off if judge can not comprehend
3. One CP per team; non conditional
4. Round 1 is an introduction, introduce 2 advantages
5. Round 2 introduces the CP that is non conditional for the team
6. Perm doesn't exist, the plan is to remove welfare + CP.
7. Round 3 is concluding args to 2 advantages with no sources, just sum ups. Then there should be responses to the CPs
8. Failure to obey the rules wil result in a DQ and will cause all 7pts to be rewarded to the opposing team
"I often quote myself. It adds spice to my conversation."
- George Bernard Shaw
Full Forfeit
Con forfeit the whole debate.
Forfeited
Full forfeit on Con's part. Pro actually had arguments, sources and didn't forfeit a round.
FF with good sourcing by Pro and zero from Con.
Full forefeit
You voted all CON when it should be all PRO
Uhh... what?
wrong person buddy
How about you challenge Earth to a debate on this?
All benefits like SNAP and WIC? And Medicare/Socalized healthcare? Also, mind if we debate LD style? I'm game.
Welfare benefits should be remove from our governing system
I am interested. Do you want a removal of welfare benefits or what?
Supa, you would easily get an opponent here if we knew what the fuck you were trying to argue. Is this about eliminating welfare, eliminating police welfare checks, going paperless when giving people welfare checks. We honestly don't know what this debate is about or your position on whether you are pro or con on the topic
So are you pro or con on welfare going paperless?
If anyone want's to just have a normal LD type debate, feel free. No Policy terms like T, DA, K, CPs, or Theory
We can debate this in a policy manner, or we just Lincoln Douglas this bitch
Basically Lincoln Douglas is the way we would normally debate
T: Topicality, debate the plan not topical
DA: Dis Advantage to this plan
K: Kritk to the plan
Cp: Counter the plan of removing welfare checks with another plan
I don't understand your rules. Like what the fuck is a perm, DA and T?
SO go paperless?
A physical money check, not a police welfare check
https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-a-police-welfare-check-definition-laws.html
the debate is about how we should remove wealth fare checks from usa society
Checks
Is this about welfare cheques or welfare checks. In America you spell both the same so it's not clear what you're referring to.
I aggree.