"pro gives empty and unreasonable claims that no matter what the president does to make him feel safe or unsafe, he will not feel impacted at all. "
My friend, you have to prove that a person makes me feel any kind of way, let alone the presidential administration.
"Are you really telling me if he declares he will begin world war 3, you will still feel as safe as you do right now?"
What does world war 3 supposed to mean to me? Is it a sequel to world war 2?
How do you know how safe I feel? Do you know where I live or what I go through?
This is my point. STOP looking at ONE AREA which is the law. Don't continue to dismiss personal situations.
" If he believes in those people who take the black lives matter movement too far, and completely defunds the police, leading to a ridiculous nation where crime is free to run rampant? "
Something is incomplete with this segment. I don't get the point but appears naive.
Crime is rampant NOW and since you've mentioned "black lives matter", they're saying in a basic sense, crime is pretty rampant with so called police committing it by killing unarmed folks over and over again. That's PRETTY SAFE , ISN'T THAT SO?
Let me ask, do you believe that you're supposed to look after yourself?
"Pro's statement is as bad as saying the US Congress doesn't matter and impeachment shouldn't even be a thing. "
I call STRAWMAN. I never made any statement to indicate that the law, government , etc. is useless. Be very careful, don't move too fast reading things into the topic statement.
So you can understand, basically the topic gets down to the bottom line, that in terms of safety overall, it's up to the individual person.
Think, think, think, in a home invasion, an attack on the street, I'm my basis for defense. That is at least until I call in for reinforcement.
"Based on pro's thoughts, it wouldn't matter if Biden personally killed people as a mass murderer and caused severe chaos in the nation; he would personally still feel safe regardless of how extreme or how benign Biden is being."
Please PROVE THESE ARE MY THOUGHTS.
THE DESCRIPTION IS INDICATIVE OF CURRENT EVENTS.
I will advise you to discontinue adding these things in. In either case , you're still responsible for your own life. I got this idea you're a big proponent of welfare. The government just has to take care of you and everything.
"He is going down a ridiculous slippery slope and devaluing human security and safety as a fundamental. Regardless of who becomes president, it is assumed that they are of sound mind and will follow the US Constitutional rights of human life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But if we allow any presidential candidate to be picked at random, it could be a severely big difference. "
This is just STRAWMAN out the backside. You're treating this as though I'm saying we ought to not have a system anymore. All I've said was vote who you will for whatever justification you see. But you and many others alike, drop this illusion that you can't defend yourself and that the oval office has to do it.
I don't know how long you've been on this planet but presidential term after presidential term, have you really been tricked into thinking your line of defense weakened or increased due to politics?
That sucks for you because mine didn't.
"Consider Andrew Yang's plan to give everyone monthly 1,000$. You would definitely be personally impacted by this and feel at least somewhat financially more stable."
What does this have to do with safety?
Keep your hands off the goalpost.
"As such, it is definitive that president election is a decisive measure of how safe you are. *
When I was able to keep a stray dog from attacking me, how am I not the measure of safety ultimately?
"Remember, it doesn't have to be physically safe either. Some people feel their jobs are being taken by immigrants outside the US. When Trump prevents these immigration quotas, do they not feel that their jobs is secure, and hence, they are safe? Now you can see, the president elect with different policies can effect how safe people actually feel."
You're going to have define what "safe" means when you use the term.
Is this point supposed to mean , unemployment is a very unsafe thing ?
I've been unemployed and felt safe as in secure financially. That's because I'M THE MEASURE for setting up a savings account. Not only that but making appropriate financial and prudent, constructive choices
See again, I'm getting from you, a mentality that has to do with depending on the government.
For the record, there has not been one rebuttal to my points. That is due to them being irrefutable.
I've told you to stop looking in one place such as the law/government. You haven't expressed any views beyond what the law can do moving towards what you can do. As a person, it appears you've given up your individual mind capable of strategizing security and protection to a socialized mind.
Being a provider for yourself, you take accountability, you protect your best interest, you get insurance, you get a 401k, you're independent. All of these avenues are means to protect yourself.
You haven't disproven anything I pointed out. What I've pointed out are innate human entitlements. A right to defend oneself.
You've proven naivety on your part within your position.