You get another chance. I'm back on trial. What is the problem you see with me?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 5 votes and with 15 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Here you air your disputes involving the debates I been in with you or with anyone. The topics, the premises, debates that you've seen me in, let's discuss them. Hopefully everybody gets a chance, gets a turn at this as I plan to do several of these trials/confrontations.
Now this is still in the spirit of contest. As you try to prove your points valid, I will render my points to refute and or correct yours.
So in regards to the way I argue or why I made a particular point, said a particular thing, came up with a particular topic, even personal views, here's the opportunity to challenge it all in this challenge. You can question, challenge a challenge, etc.
For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.
ARGS to PRO for making an argument
CON failed to present any kind of argument
Pro humorously demonstrates why it's necessary to write a clear debate resolution. He proves that he got another chance, he proves that Con is on trial, and he states that his issue with Con is that he wants him to have an issue with him and put him on trial. Pro successfully demonstrates each part of the resolution, and Con has no answer for it.
Pro showed that he had a problem with con’s expectation that pro must have a problem with him, which con refused to challenge.
The debate really went down to: Is Mall back on trial? The answer is yes, PRO fulfills his BOP while CON does not.
there's really no actual debate here, but as the premise is near impossible to actually debate, I'll give pro the win here.
I have not. Unless you speak for everyone , I'm giving somebody a chance to make a so called case.
So when this challenge expires, case closed.
stop doing this, we haven't had enough debates since the last Trial debate, so we don't know if you changed or not.