Instigator / Pro

Ms.Amina

1487

rating

debates

0.0%

won

Topic

#2851

I should protect my mental health by all means

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 7 votes and with 22 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman

Tags

Health

Parameters

Publication date: 03.04.2021 09:16AM
Last updated date: 03.16.2021 05:53AM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 2
Time for argument: Two days
Max argument characters: 10,000
Voting period: One week
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Con

RationalMadman

1702

rating

573

debates

67.8%

won

Description

Outside influence will always create confusion and disturbance to your mental state.

Round 1

Ms.Amina

03.06.2021 09:54AM

Pro

Forfeited

RationalMadman

03.07.2021 04:20AM

Con

no need

Round 2

Ms.Amina

03.09.2021 04:20AM

Pro

Forfeited

RationalMadman

03.09.2021 05:53AM

Con

No worries

Bringerofrain

03.09.2021 01:41PM

Actually BOP was not evenly split, so I should have given arguments to RM, but I don't think it matters too much

Sum1hugme

03.06.2021 04:21PM

I hate seeing all the new people dropping out like flies.

ILikePie5

03.13.2021 09:20PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full Forfeit

Barney

03.11.2021 08:50AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

They did such a good job protecting their mental health, they abstained from the debate... If they should have done so, was not proven.

Benjamin

03.11.2021 08:48AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Arguments: "no need" is a valid argument, it simply lacked evidence. However, PRO did not refute it, so the baseless assertion counts as a fact.

Conduct: CON did not forfeit.

MisterChris

03.09.2021 01:46PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Welp....................................................................................

Bringerofrain

03.09.2021 01:40PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Arguments tied because neither side offered them. I would still like to see the side who did not forfeit make arguments in these debates, but I understand the opportunity cost of doing so.

Conduct points to RM for not forfeiting

Sum1hugme

03.09.2021 11:22AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full Forfeit

gugigor

03.09.2021 05:54AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

full forfeited